The concept of "collective knowledge" is often lauded as the next step toward truth in online media. But recent scuffles over inaccuracies in Wikipedia entries call into question the reliability of the medium. Some scathing press and ongoing abuses of the site's open format caused Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales to limit the article submission process. But doubts about whether these changes will mean more accurate entries are still circulating. Do you consider Wikipedia a trusted source of factual information? Share your thoughts in our TalkBack section.
Cracks show in community-driven encyclopedia
Growing pains for Wikipedia
CNET News.com
A false Wikipedia 'biography'
USA Today
Who owns your Wikipedia bio?
The Register
Adam Curry gets podbusted
CNET News.com
Is Wikipedia safe from libel liability?
CNET News.com
Perspective: Wikipedia and the nature of truth
CNET News.com
Transcript of Jimmy Wales and John Seigenthaler on CNN
Wikipedia
Wikipedia is the next Google
WebProNews
Why Wikipedia isn't like Linux
The Register
Wikipedia: the dawn of democratic media?
eGov Monitor
Can you trust Wikipedia?
Mail & Guardian Online
Wikibooks takes on textbook industry
CNET News.com
How wikis are changing our view of the world
CNET News.com
Esquire wikis article on Wikipedia
CNET News.com
Boy brings encyclopaedia to book
BBC News
Newsmaker: Open-sourcing the news
CNET News.com