Perspective: Protectionism never works

perspective The story of American trade in the Digital Age is one of stunning success.

Our national commitment to the principles of openness and competitiveness has generated tens of thousands of high-paying jobs in a technology sector that is the envy of the free world. At the 2008 International CES (Consumer Electronics Show) in Las Vegas, we're witnessing first hand the amazing fruits of that commitment.

How then, in the face of this well-documented and ongoing success, are protectionists gaining so much traction by criticizing trade and calling for a return to a utopian, isolationist past that never was?

As it turns out, they're part of a long, if not proud, tradition.

Protectionists throughout history have had great success exciting passions by appealing to fear: fear of lost jobs, fear of cultural dilution, and fear of the other. Protectionist rhetoric is a proven vote getter, so it's no surprise to see it dusted off and trotted out like clockwork every election cycle.

What protectionists don't have is a track record of being right.

In all of the passionate antitrade polemic spewed forth in the coming months, you won't hear about the many instances of great historical successes in protectionism. Why?

Because managing trade and picking winners and losers is rarely the path to prosperity. One need look no further than the atrophied economy of North Korea for an extreme modern example of this failed economic ideology. Closer to home, our own forays into protectionist policies--most famously the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930--have exacerbated some of our most crushing economic downturns. That dynamic remains very much in place today, and is supported by the most up-to-date economic evidence.

In its World Development Indicators 2007 report, the World Bank found countries that did the "worst" job of opening their borders to international trade witnessed substantial drops in gross domestic product, while countries that performed the "best" experienced sizable economic growth.

Special coverage
CES 2008 is here
Check out the latest reports, photos, and videos from the massive Las Vegas electronics showcase.

In real terms, what that means to Americans is that a free trade environment provides American innovators with a global market for their ideas and products. It also ensures that American companies can continue creating the high-paying, highly skilled jobs that are most desirable to American workers. In 2005, the consumer electronics industry alone helped add 30,000 American jobs.

Free trade means that working Americans have access to life-changing technologies at affordable prices. In 1975, the average American household had one consumer electronics device. Today, that number has grown to 25. These are our computers, our mobile phones, our music players, DVD players, and televisions. Three-quarters of all American households with Internet access at home now subscribe to broadband Internet service--bringing the world into their homes at lightning speed. Imagine the impact on our quality of life and productivity if we were denied access to these devices or limited to only one.

From a global standpoint, trade--particularly in the high-tech sector--means development, access to information, spreading democratic ideals, and forging ties of friendship and commerce with developing nations. In a networked world, cell phones and Internet devices have become a prerequisite for informed global citizenship. Trade helps people in developing countries get the tools they need to participate and thrive and these tools are coming to life in Las Vegas.

Appearing this week at the International CES is a new approach to wireless networking--making it both affordable and simple to deploy wireless broadband access across neighborhoods and villages and an SMS-based information system that allows farmers to check the price of their goods--enabling millions of producers to know the true market value of their crops.

In the coming months and years, Congress and the American people will have a choice to make. Either we build on the progress we have made in the global marketplace by ratifying new bilateral trade agreements with Colombia, Panama, the Republic of Korea, and others, and seeking to reauthorize Trade Promotion Authority; or we turn back the clock, walling off America from the rest of the world and from the global markets that have fueled our success.

Some 140,000 people, including over 25,000 from 140 countries, will pass through the halls of the International CES this week, marveling at the latest technological advances, meeting colleagues, sharing ideas and striking deals. In many ways, it is a tiny microcosm of the global trading environment it represents. Just as Las Vegas benefits from being at the nexus of that environment, so too has the United States benefited from its leadership role in international trade.

The competitive global marketplace is not always pretty, or easy to navigate, but it is our best and only hope for retaining the global innovation leadership that has been such a boon for our country and its citizens. America is a great nation, and a great nation should not shy away from the necessary challenge of adapting and excelling in an increasingly interconnected world.

We should consider very carefully what abandoning that role would mean, before our hard-won gains are swept away by the rhetoric of protectionism and fear.

Biography
Gary Sharpiro is the chief executive of the Consumer Electronics Association.

More Perspectives

More from News.com on this story's topics

International governments

Create an email alert | RSS feed

CES

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Politics

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Consumer hardware

RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
free trade, Consumer Electronics Show, trade, Las Vegas, success

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 47 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Shapiro full o' Bunk.
by rob.rallapalli January 8, 2008 6:10 AM PST
My grandfather, a WWII vet, lived through the great depression as a young man, 25% or more unemployment, no jobs, soup lines, all of it. He said, without the war, it never would have gotten better, and from 1929 to 1939, it did not get better. Then came the war, government took the reigns of failing industry, set policy in trade and production, putting American ingenuity, hard work, and the application of science to industry first. That commitment to creating and producing products in the United States is what saved our nation and vaulted the US to the top. Today, the U.S. no longer has that commitment and is losing badly; however, our competitors in China, Europe, and India are doing what the US had done, and what the US should be doing. Using government policy, managing trade so that it is fair and beneficial to us (what Shapiro terms protectionism - our competitors term smart trade policy), investing not just in research (which is also sliding badly in the U.S.), but also investing in production of goods. Using low cost loans to industry, smart trade policy that benefits America as a whole, and creating a level playing field by recognizing cost imbalances in labor and environmental standards that must be balanced with tariffs to create a level playing field between trading partners. Shapiro is the classic example of failing US managerial talent. As far as one can see, the leaders of real industry are foreign peoples and companies producing the best consumer electronics on earth; then you look at the US that is producing nothing of note, has lost most of it's consumer product manufacturing base, and is now losing it's auto and air transport production, leaving nothing but a service economy with a shrinking base of people to serve, and a mass of poor to serve them - much like India and China have been until recently. People like Shapiro who are speaking for foreign producers who produce nothing in the United States, is lobbying to continue abusive and unfettered access to U.S. markets for foreign companies, leaving nothing to question that he and his ilk are un-american. Caring not for the U.S., but only his constituency. In an early day, he would have been labeled a traitor. The label surely fits.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Protectionism does work
by pugster January 8, 2008 6:52 AM PST
All the other countries use some form of protectionism to protect their jobs from some key industries. You don't see European countries buying Boeing airplanes. You don't see Japan buying American electronics. I'm not saying that we should do it for all the industries, but we should do it for the industries that can keep the high paying jobs here.

Take an example of the Steel Industry. Japan, Russian and Brazil has been dumping steel to us for less than the cost to manufacture at around late 1990's. Thanks to the Bush administration, they let it happen, thus US has to be forced to shut down and the US steel industry went down the tubes.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Free trade created the West is common myth
by galacticcruiser January 8, 2008 6:57 AM PST
It is a common myth that free trade is what helped the west and in particular Britain and America rise. What they did, cleverly, was manage trade to their advantage.

When in a position of dominance, they them promoted free trade (with pressure from domestic industries too). (China and India are doing that now.)

Free trade has no doubt been extremely beneficial for these and other nations (not discounting these countries' ability to influence international trade in their favor, mind you!), but to take these successes and transport them back into time is stupid, but many historians do that.

The author of the article would do good to read history that debunk the self-praise of what is referred to as "eurocentricism".

Of course, the author's position also biases his own view as free trade is good for his business.
Reply to this comment
Agreed! Shapiro is Bunk!
by inachu January 8, 2008 7:01 AM PST
These people are the ones Dobbs call corporate eliteists who care nothing of their fellow man and do everything for the mighty buck. even if it means tanking of the dollar.
Reply to this comment
Another neocon in action
by RobertinOhio January 8, 2008 7:43 AM PST
Sorry there Gary...protectionism has a pretty good track record in fact. If it was not for protectionism and exporting minerals and steel in the 1930s and 1940s, we would not have a automotive industry that ruled the world for almost 50 years.

Now thanks to NAFTA, CAFTA, and other free trade agreements, innovation and invention is taking place in other countries with scaling down of wages here in the US and all of those advances are being sold back to us as cheap products. Take a look at manufacturing and the current state of the auto industry here in the US if you think free trade is a good idea. I doubt an auto worker in Michigan would agree.

Other poor legislation like the Patriot act labels all non-US persons and now those people are being educated in schools outside the US and starting their careers there instead of here.

It seems you have a lot to learn about the economy actually works and how it affects other people on the wrong side of the free trade.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Counterexamples
by psulonen January 8, 2008 7:50 AM PST
China. Russia (post-Yeltsin). Argentina (post-default).

Read some Stiglitz, folks.

Oh, and... protectionism would probably not be a great idea for the USA at this time... but saying that "it never works" is demonstrably untrue.
Reply to this comment View reply
Incredibly Poor Student of History
by CompEng January 8, 2008 8:13 AM PST
I don't have time at work to debunk this properly, but let's just say one has to have an appallingly poor grasp of history, especially in the 19th and early 20th centuries, to make such a claim.
The global winners have occasionally been those who shouted for free trade, but generally not those that actually applied it (so-called free trade as recently applied seems for most counties to be an excuse to con other nations into giving away their golden geese, except for the U.S. which is actually conning its own people). So-called free trade has provided the veneer of prosperity that we enjoy today, but there is no depth to that prosperity, since we have merely been consuming our past and future.
This does not mean we should not trade or interact globally. We should! Trade has many benefits. But trade must be regulated very carefully to make sure that the benefits of trade are shared well, and that the economy does not become so mobile and "efficient" that speculation and manipulation pay more than production. And organizations like the WTO are so corrupt and misused that they are little better than a joke in this regard.
Reply to this comment View reply
Check the trade deficit
by retire57 January 8, 2008 9:45 AM PST
Just look at the trade defict to answer the guestion of protectionism. Years ago we used to buy boatloads of junk and sell boatloads of bulldozers. They have taken our inventions and technolgy and produced a better product at a lower cost simply due to way lower wages and lack of enviormential protection standards. These are products that used to be made by american workers built in american factorys paying american taxes. We live in america and must protect our way of life as strongly as we protect our constition. With no factories there is no work, no work no wages, no wages no taxes, no taxes no america. How can we continue to take care of the rest of the world if we can't even take care of ourselves?
Reply to this comment
Get rid of protections
by lyntone January 8, 2008 9:48 AM PST
Lets get rid of our millitary.
Protections don't work, see how silly that is?
Reply to this comment
RECESSIONS
by lyntone January 8, 2008 10:01 AM PST
With recessions the government has in the past, reduced taxes and interest rates to get people to buy, causing the factories to re-hire and to end the recession. now take the factoris out of the equation, if the people start buying, who benifits,... the Chinese factories.
NOT AMERICANS!
VOTE FOR EDWARDS!
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Latest tech news headlines

Most Popular Stories
Google's search secret: It gets rid of you
Developer creates copy-paste tech for iPhone
Will Wright on the origins of 'Spore'
Palm Treo Pro: Not digging it
American Airlines launches in-flight Wi-Fi
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.11%) 12.78 11,430.21
S&P 500 (0.25%) 3.18 1,277.72
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 1,816.15
CNET TECH (-0.11%) -1.71 1,629.09
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement
On CBS.com: A bride is murdered at her wedding
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites