September 30, 2007 9:00 PM PDT
Microsoft Office heads to the Web
Last modified: December 10, 2007 8:50 AM PST
- Related Stories
-
Rivals make run at Microsoft Office
September 18, 2007 -
Microsoft eyes new ways to sell Office
July 11, 2007 -
Ballmer hints at Microsoft's future in the 'cloud'
July 10, 2007 -
Online Works might be in the works
September 14, 2006 -
Microsoft eyes making desktop apps free
November 14, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
Microsoft preps for business services push
September 7, 2007 -
Microsoft Office Live
June 18, 2007
The software maker is announcing Office Live Workspace, a free online tool for viewing, sharing and storing--but not editing--Office documents online. (Its existing Office Live efforts will be rebranded as Office Live Small Business.) It's not quite ready--starting Monday customers will be able to put in their name to be part of a beta testing program expected to begin later this year.
Still, the effort is a recognition that competition is heating up in the productivity arena, an area that large rivals had basically ceded to Microsoft a few years ago. In addition to Google's effort, which as of earlier this month also includes presentation software, IBM announced its free Lotus Symphony productivity software, which prompted 100,000 downloads in its first week of availability.
Video: Office Live Workspace looks to narrow Google Apps gap
Free service is positioned as "extension" to Microsoft Office.
Adobe, meanwhile, on Monday is expected to announce it has acquired Virtual Ubiquity, a start-up that has built a Web-based word processor, called Buzzword, using Adobe's Flash and AIR technologies. Adobe is also introducing a service, code-named Share, that allows people to share and store documents via the Web.
A blend of online services and traditional software
For Microsoft, Office Live Workspace is also the next step in what the company touts as its "software plus services" strategy, essentially the notion that online services can serve as a complement to locally run software, but not necessarily fully replace software running on a consumer's own desktop machine or on a businesses server.
In some cases, though, Microsoft is also offering its traditional server software entirely as a hosted service. To start with, Microsoft is launching hosted versions of its Exchange e-mail and calendar program, its SharePoint portal software and Office Communications Server, its product for handling corporate instant messaging and telephony. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and other executives had previously said that such a service was coming.
Initially, the offer is aimed at large businesses that plan to use the software for more than 5,000 people. Microsoft Online Services, as that project is known, is born of a two-year-old effort in which companies such as Energizer Holdings and XL Capital essentially outsourced their desktop computing efforts to Microsoft.
Microsoft is moving cautiously with both efforts. By limiting the software hosting to the largest customers, it hopes to give partners that already offer hosted services some time to find a new niche and allow Microsoft to test itself with a smaller number of customers, before broadly offering the service directly. Partners will still be able to offer their own hosted service if they choose, or resell Microsoft's hosted service.
On the Office Live Workspace front, Microsoft will initially offer the product with no advertising, though Microsoft executives said that it has been designed so that ads can be shown in the future.
The company is also not allowing people to edit their documents online, but executives stressed over and over that Microsoft is committed to being the leader in productivity software and that includes online editing. (Translation: We don't think we need to have editing in there right now, but if that changes, we're prepared to do so.)
Another key project down the road is integrating Office Live Workspaces with other "Live" products such as Windows Live Hotmail and Windows Live Messenger, so that people will be able to view Office attachments they get via e-mail or IM. Google currently allows Gmail users to open attachments in Google Docs.
Microsoft has already said it has big plans for Office Live. At its partner conference in July, COO Kevin Turner said the product has the potential to be one of the company's top three or four most-used products.
Nor is the company stopping there. It is also planning an ad-funded version of Microsoft Works, has trialed prepaid cards for time-limited versions of Office and is exploring still other approaches to offer Office in as many ways as it can without overloading customers.
"We've put more of our marketing IQ behind alternative business models and alternative distribution strategies in the last two years," Corporate Vice President Chris Capossela said in an interview at the partner conference.
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Office Live,
Microsoft Office,
Google Apps,
Adobe Systems Inc.,
Google Inc.
Then what's the point? Yes, I know everyone and their mom has
Microsoft Word, but it seems Microsoft is missing the point a
little: We want to be able to make edits (even small ones) to docs
from afar, on our mobile phone with web access and while
sitting in an airport.
They have a good point: Desktop software isn't going to be
replace by web-based software anytime soon. However,
extremely basic editing functions, like changing the phrasing of
a sentence in a marketing document, is essential for an online-
based productivity suite. Without that, where's the productivity?
"online services can serve as a complement to locally run software". So true.
That's why a lot of people are finding Google Apps combined with OpenOffice.org is an excellent solution.
Get a clue people; Microsoft is just starting out here with "view online only, edit locally":
"...but executives stressed over and over that Microsoft is committed to being the leader in productivity software and that includes online editing."
I'm sure that as SharePoint is today the editing experience both online and offline will be smooth and seamless because a single company put together the end-to-end solution (kinda of like Apple does with its products).
Now, I've tried web apps and IMHO they suck for because browser-based apps cannot decently duplicate the functionalities of desktop apps, at least not with the current technologies we have right now. Have you seen the graph rendered by Google Docs? Horible.
http://www.zoho.com/