Unlimited long distance $24.99/mo
March 9, 2007 12:21 PM PST
Report: FBI's snooping did not follow rules
- Related Stories
-
GOP skepticism over NSA program widens
May 15, 2006 -
Senators quiz FBI director on Patriot Act
May 2, 2006 -
Year in review: Electronic surveillance takes center stage
December 29, 2005 -
Must we renew the Patriot Act?
December 12, 2005 -
Patriot Act may be renewed without reforms
December 7, 2005 -
ACLU challenges Patriot Act
November 2, 2005 -
Police blotter: Patriot Act wins a round
October 14, 2005 -
Can Bush carry the day?
July 18, 2005 -
Judge disarms Patriot Act proviso
September 29, 2004 -
Labor groups raise outsourcing privacy concerns
July 26, 2004
The 199-page report, which found "serious misuse" of the surveillance power (PDF), says that FBI field agents unlawfully accessed telephone companies' internal databases showing calling records, and repeatedly sought and obtained information that federal law does not permit to be disclosed without a judge's approval.
Inspector General Glenn A. Fine oversaw the creation of the report, which reviewed the FBI's use of national security letters. The 2001 Patriot Act expanded the FBI's ability to use those letters--which do not require court approval--to obtain confidential information on Americans from banks, credit card companies, credit bureaus, telephone companies and Internet service providers.
Fine said, however, that there was no evidence that the FBI agents' unlawful activities "constituted criminal misconduct." Unlike conducting an unlawful wiretap, which is a federal felony, unlawful use of national security letters carries no criminal penalties.
Friday's disclosure of the FBI's slipshod use of the secret investigative technique (recipients are not permitted to disclose the letter's existence) reverberated quickly and loudly on Capitol Hill and inside the Bush administration.
FBI Director Robert Mueller called a news conference in Washington during which he took responsibility for the wrongdoing. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales sent a letter to Inspector General Fine saying that "the problems identified in your review are serious and must be addressed immediately." Neither disputed the report's conclusions.
Among members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats said they would try to find out what led to widespread abuse of the national security letter process.
Sen. Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat, said he would press for "quick Senate reforms" to stop abuses and said he expected the Judiciary and Intelligence committees would conduct full and prompt investigations.
Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, said that the Judiciary Committee will have to "undertake comprehensive oversight on this important matter and perhaps act to limit the FBI's power by revising the Patriot Act."
Among the report's findings:
• A review of a representative sample of 77 FBI investigative files showed that 17 of them--22 percent--contained "one or more possible violations relating to national security letters that were not identified by the FBI."
• The FBI underreported its use of national security letters to Congress. A spot check of four FBI field offices showed that requests made by the secret letters were underreported by 22 percent.
• The FBI's use of national security letters has "grown dramatically since the enactment of the Patriot Act." In 2000, the last full calendar year before the September 11 attacks, the FBI sent about 8,500 requests. During the following three-year period ending in 2005, the FBI sent a total of 143,074 requests.
• An increasing number of U.S. citizens and residents have been targeted during that three-year period. About 39 percent of national security letters related to U.S. citizens and residents in 2003; two years later it had climbed to about 53 percent of requests.
See more CNET content tagged:
USA PATRIOT Act,
audit,
request,
Sen.,
letter
Fine said, however, that there was no evidence that the FBI agents' unlawful activities "constituted criminal misconduct." Unlike conducting an unlawful wiretap, which is a federal felony, unlawful use of national security letters carries no criminal penalties
Oh I get it. It's a joke. It's not criminal conduct because it's not against the law.
Did I read that right?
You mean it's not against the law? So they can spy on us whenever they want at the drop of hat for total ******** made up , or worse- - "she was cute and I wonder where she lives and is she married?"
reasons and it's NOT against the law?
As in "I hate what that guy said online and I am gong to ruin his life" reasons?
As in "That company is my brother-in-law's company's competitor and I need to ruin them" reasons?
As in "Our little group has taken upon itself to make life *really* hard for the opposing political party members and I need to know who they are" reasons?
As in "It's for the good of the country that we destroy the personal lives of these key individuals; history will prove we were right, probably" reasons?
Is this a joke?
"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither" - Ben Franklin.
federal law does not permit to be disclosed without a judge's
approval."
What Federal law?
Isn't a law with no penalty usually called a suggestion?
Quote: "Fine said, however, that there was no evidence that the
FBI agents' unlawful activities "constituted criminal misconduct."
I'm pretty sure "unlawful activities" make them criminals, but
this "misconduct" is a puzzler. is "criminal misconduct" getting
caught, or failing to behave like a criminal?
Quote: "A review of a representative sample of 77 FBI
investigative files showed that 17 of them--22 percent--
contained "one or more possible violations..."
AND THEN
"...requests made by the secret letters were underreported by 22
percent."
Coincidence? Or is it proof they knew they were breaking the
"suggestion"?
Finally,
Quote: "...Republicans and Democrats said they would try to find
out what led to widespread abuse..."
illegal breaches of federal law by law enforcement. Penalty? A
paycheck, information not held by the public, possible
promotion.
One last question: Are they that dumb, or do they think we are?
Lampie
unconditional powers for the government. They can't even control
themselves during the FIRST FEW YEARS. What do you think will
happen in a decade?
Domestic_Security_Enhancement_Act_of_2003