July 3, 2007 7:05 AM PDT

Developers cooling on Windows desktop, study finds

Maybe Microsoft's stronghold grip on the desktop is slipping after all.

But instead of the Web stealing away Windows users, as people have predicted for years, it's Linux and handheld devices.

According to an Evans Data study published on Tuesday, software developers are choosing to write applications for Windows deskop PCs less than they used to.

In a survey, Evans Data found that almost 65 percent of software developers are targeting some version of Windows for their applications, as opposed to nearly 75 percent last year. The research group expects the number to drop another 2 percent in the coming year.

The culprit? Linux. Developers are choosing to write applications for Linux desktops in almost 12 percent of cases, which is a 34 percent increase from last year.

"It's clear that a shift away (from) Windows began about two yeas ago, and the data show that this migration is now accelerating. Linux has benefited, but we also see corresponding growth in niche operating systems for non-traditional client devices. The landscape is changing," said Evans Data CEO John Andrews in a statement.

The popular notion among tech industry followers is that a more capable Web browser, able to run sophisticated applications either online or offline, will make the desktop operating system less important, if not irrelevant.

Many companies--even Microsoft--are taking up the idea of building a "Web, or cloud, operating system" for which developers can write online.

Even with more online applications, though, the Evans Data study notes that Windows desktop application development remains steady.

Other findings from its survey are that JavaScript--a language supported in modern browsers--is the most popular scripting language by far, with more than three times the number of users as PHP, Ruby or Python.

Also, virtualization is becoming commonplace, with about 42 percent of developers expecting to use the technology in the next year.

Update: the survey is completed twice a year on a voluntary basis by 400 software developers and is not sponsored by any software vendors.

Recent posts from News Blog
The dumbest generation? Not this crowd
What is blocking Vista users from recording NBC shows?
YouTube ads for viral videos: 'buzz targeting'
EA tops expectations, looks ahead
Hackers going after restaurants, supermarkets
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 51 comments (Page 1 of 2)
You Know This Article Makes Me Angry
by StargateFan July 3, 2007 7:49 AM PDT
I am tired of every other article I read always telling the Microsoft obituary. Microsoft is no where near death. They are just in a tough spot, with Vista not helping out very much right now, and Apple on the hype train. The Linux foundation figured why don't we join Apple. My Personal opinion is that Linux right now is a phase which will wear off very soon after MS get's Vista correct and it is adopted by most people/organizations, and/or MS releases the next installment of Windows. The second point I would like to touch is this web 2.0 thing. Over and Over again web 2.0 has been described as web resource technologies, not platforms for web based OS's, or web based Applications which run inside the browser window. At the Mix 07 conference Ray Ozzie confirmed that this is not the intention of Web 2.0, rather Web 2.0 is a resource standard. The OS can not survive in the cloud. I am sorry but I am tired of hearing about the demise of Microsoft and the glory of Web apps, as much as I am tired of hearing about the iPhone. It is my personal opinion that the number one reason developers are attracted to Web base, is because the languages are incredibly easy. For example let's look at HTML, you can not get simpler then that. This is where companies who develope developing standard languages should step in and make their languages somewhat easier.
Reply to this comment View all 6 replies
Developing for Linux or Open Source
by dragonbite July 3, 2007 8:11 AM PDT
Are they really "Developers are choosing to write applications for Linux desktops" or are they writing Linux-friendly Open Source which often, but not always, is ported to Windows anyway? Also, yes Linux is getting a large number of applications but if they are 12 variations of a music player should that really be a factor? I'm more interested in if commercial applications are increasing the offerings to Linux exclusively or in addition to other OSs (Windows, Mac, Solaris, FreeBSD, etc.)
Reply to this comment
It's really not surprising
by j.trauntvein July 3, 2007 8:28 AM PDT
Perhaps developers are tired of the ever-changing collection of APIs and interfaces to something that should be stable. Perhaps they are tired of having visual studio generate code that only compiles under windows simply to lock them into windows. I know that I have been fed up with the monstrosity that is the win32 API for years.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
I think that the reason for this
by rjpotts July 3, 2007 8:39 AM PDT
is that there is more room for development on other platforms. Lets face it Quicken is the standard for home finances. Its hard to compete against it on Windows. But on Apple and Linux the market is wide open. The same thing can be said for applications like Visio. No one wants to develop another Visio because who's going to use it on Windows. But that market is wide open on Apple in Linux. Commercial products built on the Windows platform are charging an arm and a leg, but commercial products built for Apple and Linux are much cheaper, have just as good, if not better features than their Windows counter parts. Yes HTML is an easy language to learn but you don't develop applications with just HTML there are many other applications and languages involved in providing a web based application. This can get very involved especially if you are trying to make it scale. Companies are moving their development to the web because the cost to deploy it is less expensive. If you worked in the days where desktop applications ruled the roost you would understand. In most business environments today if you don't have a Web based version of your product you are not going to get the product in the door. I would have to disagree with Linux being a fad or phase. Its been around for what 12 - 15 years now? Unix is going on 38 years. I think that Windows has seen its better days and the world is moving on.
Reply to this comment
People are catching on
by qwerty75 July 3, 2007 8:53 AM PDT
The lukewarm, at best, reception that Vista got should speak volumes to MS. But as usual, MS ignores it, and do their detriment. Developers are realizing that there is little need today to write to specific operating systems. There are plenty of high quality cross platform languages and libraries. Even C is extremely portable, as long as you use cross platform libraries for normally OS specific functions. And the performance cost is too small to matter, and stability isn't an issue either. The article was good until the author decided to compare Javascript with Python. What an ignorant statement that is. There is no comparison between the two. Java script is more or less just a client side scripting language, python is a full features, and quite well designed programming language. PHP is a scripting language, but almost exclusively a server side language, unlike Javascript. Ruby also can not be compared to Java script. Ruby and Python can be compared though, PHP and Ruby is a stretch, since Ruby on Rails is miles ahead of PHP running in a lamp stack. I almost expected you to write that Java and Javascript are related. LOL
Reply to this comment
Great apps for Linux already exist!
by arunk99 July 3, 2007 9:09 AM PDT
The popular perception may be that Linux has no user-friendly applications, but that's not true: take Kerika (www.kerika.com) for instance -- it is a very elegant collaboration graphical Wiki application that's available for Linux already.
Reply to this comment View reply
Future OS
by rjpotts July 3, 2007 9:11 AM PDT
I just don't see Vista being a future OS. I think that it was DOA. Its unacceptable to have to wait until SP1 for it to be stable. Its also unacceptable that they promised a boat load of features that they ripped out just so they could get something (anything) out the door. I work for a large IT company for 40K+ employees. They have said outright they will not be upgrading to Vista. There are to many mission critical applications that just do not work with Vista. We have even block IE7 do to the fact mission critical applications behave erratically. We work closely with the Federal Government. I have yet to see them make a move towards Vista. It was just two - three years ago that they made the move to XP. I think that its the other way around I think that Windows was the fad. I remember a time when TRS-80 systems and C-64 were the home users computer of choice, and in the workplace it was VAX terminals and PDP-11s. Windows has had a good run, but it really is time to move on. Vista doesn't mark the beginning of the end for Microsoft. I think that happened with all the IE exploits a few years back. Vista is just a reaffirmation that Microsoft has gotten to be too big of a company to effectively deal with its problems and produce quality products.
Reply to this comment
.NET Developer Top Job 2006
by pcpimpster July 3, 2007 9:41 AM PDT
http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/03/pf/pay_hike_jobseeker/ The good thing is we all have choices with the platforms we want to apply. Linux may be getting stronger and better, but ill stick with M$ for desktop apps till i see Dell start selling 1/3 Linux to xp/vista boxes. if anything beats the M$ platform down to size it will be browser apps. not so much as an OS but as an alternative to what would normally need purchased and now is really cheap, or really free through a web app. also, the easiest way to make an app cross platform is to build it in the browser. talking about dbase, etc. apps. which is what i work on. has DX10 been ported to Linux yet, if not, no next gen graphics for you penguins. .NET framework is kind of the sh!t Running x64 XP just fine, not sure what you mean by they didn?t get the x86 and x64 arch?s right, seems to work perfectly for me and is really easy to compile a 32bit app as a 64 in the .net environment. maybe i should read up, or no ill just right some more apps to express my viability into making my company better and my job secure.
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
yes windows is on the decline
by FutureGuy July 3, 2007 4:00 PM PDT
get educated http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1260325,00.html
Reply to this comment
They should've stuck with XP
by mmille10 July 3, 2007 6:52 PM PDT
IMO Windows XP became the best "good enough" version of Windows Microsoft ever produced. It's the most stable version they produced up until Vista. It's not the most secure OS, but it's possible to secure it if you know what measures to take. It's got a few things that are clunky about it, but I like it fine, and I see little reason to upgrade to Vista, especially given the common notion that not everything works on it, due to the security model it has now. I think if software compatibility were better people would be a little more inclined to get it. For the first time in more than a decade I've considered upgrading to a non-Windows machine, mainly because my needs have changed and I'm not so "software dependent" anymore on Windows. The one thing that still ties me to Windows is MS Word, which I use occasionally. I could get that on the Mac, but my current version of it is for Windows. I'd rather not pay for a new version to get the same thing I have already. I know you can produce Word doc's in OpenOffice, but last I heard its Word file formatting still has its quirks. If they could get 100% format compatibility I'd take a look at it.
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: