August 9, 2007 3:17 PM PDT

AT&T calls censorship of Pearl Jam lyrics a mistake

Apparently, saying disparaging things about President George Bush is enough to get you censored. At least that's what happened to the band Pearl Jam Sunday night during AT&T's Webcast of the Lollapalooza concert in Chicago.

According to fans who watched the concert on AT&T's Blue Room Web site, portions of the song "Daughter," in which singer Eddie Vedder altered lyrics to include anti-Bush sentiments, were bleeped out. The lyrics came during a segue into Pink Floyd's "Another Brick in the Wall."

The lyrics that were missing from the Web cast went like this:

"George Bush, leave this world alone; George Bush find yourself another home."

Pearl Jam was outraged. And the band railed against AT&T on its blog Wednesday for censoring the song.

"This, of course, troubles us as artists, but also as citizens concerned with the issue of censorship and the increasingly consolidated control of the media," the band said on its site. "AT&T's actions strike at the heart of the public's concerns over the power that corporations have when it comes to determining what the public sees and hears through communications media."

AT&T issued a statement Thursday saying the whole incident was a big mistake. It had not intended to edit out any portion of the concert. Instead it blamed an overzealous Webcast partner who had supposedly been monitoring the Web cast to bleep out curse words.

"The editing of the Pearl Jam performance on Sunday night was a serious mistake made by a Webcast vendor and completely contrary to our policy," AT&T's statement said. "We have policies in place with respect to editing excessive profanity, but AT&T does not edit or censor performances. We have that policy in place because the Blue Room is not age-restricted."

AT&T said it is working with the vendor and the band to resolve the situation. And it plans to post the song in its entirety to ensure this doesn't happen again.

I understand people's sensitivity to vulgarity in this post-Janet Jackson-flashing-her-boob-world. But it really has to make you wonder how anyone monitoring a program specifically for offensive language or images would think that it was necessary to bleep political speech. Since when has the name "George Bush" risen to the ranks of a word that rhymes with "suck"? (I'm censoring myself here because I don't particularly like using that word anyway. But you get the picture.)

What's also strange is that other politically charged segments of the concert, including when Vedder brought a disabled Iraq War veteran onstage to call for an end to the conflict, were not edited.

So perhaps this was really a mistake. But the question remains, how did this happen? And how can it be prevented from happening again in an environment where all of our news, entertainment and information is being controlled by fewer media conglomerates.

Big phone companies argue that it's absurd to think they'd purposely block content, because users would simply go elsewhere. Pearl Jam even referenced in its blog one of my own CNET News.com articles from last year, where I quoted former AT&T CEO Edward Whitacre saying, "Any provider that blocks access to content is inviting customers to find another provider."

But Pearl Jam brought up a good point on their blog when they said that in a situation where only one provider is offering content, it's easy for content to simply be deleted or blocked. It's also easy for a provider to block traffic from a service they think threatens their business.

"What happened to us this weekend was a wake up call, and it's about something much bigger than the censorship of a rock band," the blog said.

Indeed, I agree with Pearl Jam. There's a slippery slope we're walking these days. How much control should network operators and big media companies have? In my opinion, it's time people start paying attention to all the big communication and media consolidation that is going on right now in this country. If we don't sit up and take notice now, there may come a time when it's too late.

Recent posts from News Blog
YouTube ads for viral videos: 'buzz targeting'
EA tops expectations, looks ahead
Hackers going after restaurants, supermarkets
GIS exec works to unlock hidden geo data
New Office 2007 add-on makes commands easier to find
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 25 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Yes it Was a Mistake
by R. U. Sirius August 9, 2007 4:25 PM PDT
An intentional one to be sure. Which just indicates what the hell AT&T would do to content without net neutrality in place. AT&T is disgusting.
Reply to this comment
Shut Up and Sing
by fafafooey August 9, 2007 4:47 PM PDT
Who gives a crap about what a band thinks about anything other than their music. It's why I don't go to Springsteen concerts any more - not only does his new music suck, you have to listen to his misguided socialist/communist Bush-Bad Democrats-Good rhetoric.
Reply to this comment View all 8 replies
They had no problem taking AT&T's money
by solrosenberg August 9, 2007 6:12 PM PDT
If the band was so concerned about being censored by media giants, why didn't they skip the totally corporate Lollapalooza and do their own concert with their own webcast? Posers who like to rail about evil corporations while simultaneously getting paid by them are lame.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
When Rupert Molock Own WSJ...
by Stating August 9, 2007 6:46 PM PDT
Face it, we have already lost the battle against big media. Wave after wave of buyouts and consolidations. Fair and Balanced Fox is moving in on Dow Jones. Big Media news departments no longer just report the news, they manufacture the news. This whole thing reminds me of the Elliot Carver character in Tomorrow Never Dies.
Reply to this comment
funny!
by Dalkorian August 10, 2007 10:33 AM PDT
Personally, I consider the name of our fuhrer ... I mean president ... to be more profane than those commonly known 4 letter words. Just look at how he's trashed our reputation worldwide. Just look how he's opened the doors for terrorists in the middle east. Listen to all the lies and spin manipulations he gives about everything. Watch him urinate on our constitutional rights. Somehow, I can't blame AT&T until I stop laughing about this. But when I do stop laughing, if I'm not in a straight jacket and in a padded room, I'll find this act of theirs disturbing indeed. But not surprising, considering AT&T is facing lawsuits for illegally handing access to our communications over to fuhrer b**h.
Reply to this comment
This isnt censorship
by R.Jefferson August 11, 2007 9:17 AM PDT
A textbook example of censorship is a broadcaster cutting the microphone on a political debate because one of the candidates feels that cannabis should be de-scheduled as a schedule 1 drug, because the broadcasting executives are raging alcoholics and will not allow America?s drug of choice to be usurped. This is more of a case of risk management. Ever since the brown nip came out at the superbowl, the FCC will levy fines, sponsors will desert, and the Helen Lovejoy?s of the world will cry ?won?t somebody think of the children?? There are consultants out there who help produce these events and if something is questionable they will use their time delays to protect the bottom line.
Reply to this comment
The real story
by clawplock August 11, 2007 12:26 PM PDT
Actually, what is really offensive is Pearl Jam thinking it's worthy enough to cover Pink Floyd in the first place. It's cringe worthy thinking about Eddie Vedder trying to perform one of the greatest rock songs ever, from one of the greatest rock bands ever. You just don't do it. This is why this is karma.
Reply to this comment
I loved the comment
by szamprogno August 11, 2007 2:21 PM PDT
If I'm paying for a concert, I want a concert, not a lesson in politics from a non-qualified biased person.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On CHOW: Will mayo give me food poisoning?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: