• On TV.com: JESSICA ALBA photos
August 30, 2007 10:46 AM PDT

Free San Francisco Wi-Fi project dies

Posted by Marguerite Reardon
  • Print

EarthLink said late Wednesday that it is bailing out of a contract to build San Francisco's free Wi-Fi service.

EarthLink backed out of the deal a day after the company announced it was laying off 900 employees--nearly half of its staff. EarthLink, which is trying to get its finances in order, announced earlier this summer that it would not invest in any new citywide Wi-Fi deployments until it came up with a better business model.

But it was assumed the company would fulfill obligations with cities where it had already signed contracts. Now it looks like EarthLink is trying to get out of any deal where it hasn't already begun construction, even if it has a signed contract.

Earlier on Wednesday, the city of Houston announced that EarthLink had agreed to pay a $5 million penalty to the city for not meeting its first deadline for building its wireless network. EarthLink has nine months to start construction or figure out a way to get out of the contract altogether.

And now, the company has also dissolved its contract with San Francisco, which was approved in January but was awaiting final approval from San Francisco's Board of Supervisors.

Under the contract signed in January, EarthLink would have paid the city $2 million for the right to build, install and run a free Wi-Fi network that would be supported through advertising from Google. EarthLink was also going to offer a paid service that offered higher-speed connections for $20 per month.

Earlier this summer the Board of Supervisors tried to tweak the contract, asking for changes in three areas. First, it wanted EarthLink to increase the speed of the free tier of service to 500 kilobits per second. It also asked EarthLink to reduce the length of the contract from 16 years to eight years. And finally, it asked EarthLink to extend privacy provisions it offered for its paid service to the free service.

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who had stated publicly that he felt the current contract was sufficient, blamed the Board of Supervisors for dragging its feet and blowing the deal.

He told the San Francisco Chronicle, "I'm disappointed because we had a chance to get it done, and it didn't happen.The board delayed it, and now EarthLink could not be more pleased."

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi said the mayor was completely wrong in his assignment of blame.

"The mayor wanted us to rush into a deal that was half-baked," he said. "And now he's trying to cover his tracks instead of looking at the real reason this deal fell through which is the fact that EarthLink is having a complete financial meltdown."

Mirkarimi said that it was EarthLink and not the Board of Supervisors that delayed the contract approval. He said that the supervisors were simply trying to get EarthLink to answer questions about the contract.

"They were dragging their feet all summer," he said. "I would expect a company that is trying to do business with the city of San Francisco to really be wooing us. So we knew there was something going on with the company. And it turns out our instincts were right."

EarthLink was expected to appear before the Board of Supervisors on September 12th. And a final vote was expected at that time.

EarthLink declined to comment further on the San Francisco deal. But earlier this week, EarthLink's new CEO, Rolla Huff, told CNET News.com that its citywide Wi-Fi business doesn't make sense for the company right now. He said the company needs to come up with a new business model before it spends anymore money to build these networks.

"We simply have not found a way in the old business model to make a return on our investment," Huff said in the interview. "We need to get our cost structure right, so we aren't burning so much cash that shareholders want to get out of the market altogether. We need to make it a valuable option. We have a real interest in ultimately making municipal Wi-Fi successful."

Marguerite Reardon has been a CNET News reporter since 2004, covering cell phone services, broadband, citywide Wi-Fi, the Net neutrality debate, as well as the ongoing consolidation of the phone companies. E-mail Maggie.
Recent posts from News Blog
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 6 comments
Ha, ha. Socialist Gov't of S.F. Gets What it Deserves
by WJeansonne August 30, 2007 11:34 AM PDT
That will teach those rascals or bureaucrats in that VERY socialist government a thing or two by trying leverage its position to obtain undeserved benefits. I just have to laugh.
Reply to this comment
Board Of Stuporvisors
by Stating August 30, 2007 12:42 PM PDT
The SF Board of Stuporvisors racks up yet another success. They would rather give the voters nothing while they diddle around with their Marxist agenda.
Reply to this comment
Not the Socialist supervisors fault
by wayne95125 August 30, 2007 12:53 PM PDT
Earthlink's ambitions to provide municipal WI-FI networks died
when their former CEO Betty died. As much as I hate to admit it
the city supervisors are not totally at fault for this melt down.
Earthlink has come to their senses and is trying to bail out of these
deals. The business model makes no sense. It is very doubtful that
Earthlink would have ever made any money on this deal. The
opposite is probably true, they would have spent a fortune with
little or no hope of ever breaking even.
Reply to this comment
But They Stalled The Talks
by Stating August 30, 2007 3:35 PM PDT
The Stuporvisors stalled the talks with Earthlink for over a year. If they got on the stick while the getting was good, SF would have WiFi today. Instead, the pols dicked around making vendors jump through hoops, and so this is what happened. Good luck now SF trying to get another vendor step in. I sure wouldn't. Even tiny Pacifica has wireless service. SF is an embarassment.
WiFi
by sirdavefl August 30, 2007 1:47 PM PDT
Sorry to hear that earthlink is trying to back out. I am all for wireless. just think if they charged $20.00 a month. Earthlink would make profit. I like to see SF move ahead and look to google to help out with Wi-Fi.

Dave Baker
http://davecmu7.com
Reply to this comment
The long slow death of the muni Wi-Fi pipe dream
by solrosenberg August 31, 2007 1:23 AM PDT
Muni Wi-Fi always was an idiotic idea. Stupid politicians saw the el cheapo Wi-Fi routers at Best Buy and assumed it's just as easy as buying a truckload of them and putting them on utility poles. Opportunistic vendors lined up at the government teat. But the hard truth is Wi-Fi was never designed for these types of deployments. The power of Wi-Fi, which bureaucrats not surprisingly never really grasped, is the ad-hoc decentralized deployment model. But saying "let the users build their own networks" doesn't win votes and also doesn't fit the command and control model of your typical government official.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Photos: Gadgets we're thankful for

Some of your favorite Crave contributors reveal which gadget or aspect of technology they're feeling most grateful for these days.



BlackBerry Storm packs more of a drizzle

review Phone has an innovative touch screen that provides tactile feedback, but the onscreen keyboard is a bit cramped, and the smartphone can be sluggish, and speakerphone quality is choppy.



About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right