September 10, 2007 11:47 AM PDT

Now from Dell--the $920 hard drive

Consumers can now buy a notebook from Dell or its Alienware division that contains a 64GB hard drive made from flash memory.

And the upgrade will only cost you $920.

Dell is expanding its options for notebooks with drives built around flash memory. Earlier this year, the company began to sell a 32GB flash drive from Samsung as an upgrade option on some notebooks. This week, it has officially begun to sell Samsung's 64GB drive. You can swap out a regular hard drive for a 32GB or 64GB flash drive on the Dell XPS 1330 consumer notebook or get a 32GB or 64GB solid state drive on the Alienware Area 51 m9750 notebook. Alienware will also sell you a notebook with two 64GB drives in it to bring the total to 128GB.

Alienware Area-51 m9750

The Alienware Area-51 m9750.

Flash memory drives are faster in some respects than traditional hard drives and are more durable, but they do cost more. They also hold less too.

How big is the discrepancy? The standard configuration of the Alienware notebook comes with a 160GB drive and costs $2,280. Swapping that out for a 32GB drive adds $320 to the price. So that's 1/5th the storage for $320 more.

Swapping in the 64GB drive adds $920 to the price. Again--less storage, but now your notebook costs $3,200.

You get a break on the dual 64GB configuration. That only adds $1,220 to the entire price. And at 128GB, you're almost at where you started.

But, hey, the miraculous declines in price in the flash world are busy at work. When I first checked this morning, the 64GB drive cost $1,000 more. See what prices you get.

The configuration details for the XPS weren't available when I checked.

One of the odd parts of this announcement is that Dell is marketing solid state drives to consumers. Samsung and SanDisk execs (as well as Seagate execs) have said that solid state drives are probably mostly interesting to corporate buyers, who use less storage space than consumers. (Consumers are expected to chew up a lot of disk space with video.)

Corporate users also could see a lot more benefits. Boot-up time is much shorter with flash drives. Microsoft Outlook comes up rapidly--it doesn't take seven minutes. A Samsung exec showed me this and I thought it was a faked demo. Nope, he said. He uses a flash notebook at work, and co-workers like to come by and see the Outlook trick. Notebook makers in the future will also cut out some of the bulk on their notebooks when shifting to flash. Flash takes less room.

Dell added that later in the year it expects to come out with flash-based drive options for its corporate notebooks and portable workstations.

Recent posts from News Blog
Wuthering Heights, and now Wikipedia, via e-mail and RSS in 5-minute chunks
A reminder of why Microsoft wanted Yahoo
Craigslist files lawsuit against eBay, claims unfair competition
Yahoo releases Delicious plug-in for IE
Google opens geographic search interface
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Hipness doesn't enter into it
by lorcro2000 September 10, 2007 12:22 PM PDT
It's way past time for us to get rid of nasty mechanical rotating platters in our computers. Right now, yes, flash is pricier, but things are just ramping up. Moving parts are just a bad idea all round. Hard drives are fragile, generate heat and noise and in general are just slow and nasty - to the ponit where they drag the performance of the entire computer down with them. I'm amazed we've kept them as long as we have - but the manufacturers really stepped up and tweaked the heck out of them to keep them competitive. For the time being they're still the only game in town for really large data volumes. Hopefully though some really bright guy will come up with an option that is even better than flash... but until he does, flash is a lot better than drives.
Reply to this comment View reply
7 minutes to open Outlook?
by NickH September 10, 2007 12:36 PM PDT
If your Outlook takes 7 minutes to open, that deserves an article of its own. Mine opens in just a couple of seconds.
Reply to this comment View reply
I have seen outlook take 15 minutes to open.
by inachu September 10, 2007 12:55 PM PDT
the OS was a fresh new install. MS office was the only application installed. Never could figure it out and the pc has 1 gig of ram. even a defrag did not fix it. I thinik maybe a windowsupdate killed it.
Reply to this comment
"it doesn't take seven minutes to open"
by roger.d.miller September 10, 2007 1:25 PM PDT
"Microsoft Outlook comes up rapidly--it doesn't take seven minutes to open" Your computer is a sick puppy! Malware? Botnet? Michael need some professional help.
Reply to this comment
the Outlook trick?
by ubnyan September 10, 2007 1:49 PM PDT
I think we are going away from the actual article but 7 minutes for Outlook to start?? 'Cmon! Mine takes a second or less to open. Mike may need a new laptop (with a 64GB flash drive) or maybe once again he's been a victim of an electronic privacy attack(2003) that slowed down his Outlook.... :O
Reply to this comment
Load Leveling
by bitsplice September 10, 2007 2:15 PM PDT
My concern about using Flash memory is that there are a finite number of writes to a particular memory cell. Depending on the file system on the drive, for example, a FAT32 system has a special place (called the File Allocation Table) for saving the state of the file system and has to be be changed anytime a file is written to. This will wear out that section of the flash in a short amount of time. This can be compensated by load leveling (moving newly written data to a different area in the flash), but that can cause other problems, like if the computer hangs before the FAT is safely written.
Reply to this comment
I've seen Outlook open in 10 minutes
by Tsee September 10, 2007 2:42 PM PDT
But an article like this would do well with a performance review. That would answer the question: is it worth it.
Reply to this comment
Number of writes limit?
by groink_hi September 10, 2007 3:43 PM PDT
I always thought that there was a limit on the number of writes you can perform on a single block of space on a flash device. Maybe this is old information that has since then been fixed. Back then, it was an issue with Windows - as it is known to perform a ton of caching operations using the system drive. I'll still afraid of using flash technology of this size, as I was taught to use flash for temporary storage, such as storing photos via a card, or files via a thumb drive.
Reply to this comment View reply
Usual reason for Outlook starting up slow...
by groink_hi September 10, 2007 3:50 PM PDT
is when you have cache mode enabled. So if you have a ton of data stored on your Exchange server (mail, calendar, tasks, GALs, etc.) your Outlook config must download the data that's missing from your cache files (OST). That's probably why it speeds up when you switch to flash, but I wouldn't call this a solution to startup performance like this. As always Microsoft recommends boosting your hardware than for them to optimize their software. Cache mode should really only be used by portable users who need to perform network-based Outlook functions while disconnected from the corporate LAN.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: