September 17, 2007 12:20 PM PDT

Senator: Net neutrality push ain't over yet

WASHINGTON--One of the leading U.S. Senate proponents of Net neutrality laws said Monday that he's not giving up on enacting the divisive antidiscrimination rules.

Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.)

To a standing ovation, Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) urged attendees at the Future of Music Policy Summit here to "fight back and say this is something that's important for our country's interests."

Led primarily by Democrats, the push to enact a law prohibiting broadband providers from charging content providers extra fees for priority placement or faster delivery failed last year in both chambers of a Republican-controlled Congress. Since then, no significant action has occurred on the legislative front, and recently, both the Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice argued no new laws are needed.

In a familiar refrain, Dorgan defended the bill he reintroduced with Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) earlier this year as necessary to prevent Internet "gatekeepers" and "toll booths." He said he's well aware there are plenty of naysayers out there but hasn't heard any good arguments against imposing such regulations.

"Some people say, well, but it's a competitive marketplace, if one of the big interests tries to charge for its pipes..the customer will go elsewhere, it's a competitive world," Dorgan said. "Well, I'll tell you what, you're studying different economics than I am if you think this is competitive."

Neither Dorgan nor other congressional staffers present at Monday's event, however, wagered any predictions about when the bill might see movement in Congress.

"I think it's still very much alive," Jessica Rosenworcel, senior communications counsel to the Senate Commerce Committee, said during a panel discussion in the morning. That committee's chairman, Sen. Daniel Inouye, backed Net neutrality rules in the last Congress.

Rosenworcel said the discussion within her committee lately has shifted more toward encouraging greater broadband penetration in a general sense. While the issue of Net neutrality is still "important," she said there's a strong need to survey the nation to see which areas do and do not offer broadband access, and at what speeds, before politicians rush to enact any new laws related to broadband. A bill called the Broadband Data Improvement Act, approved by the commerce committee in July, seeks to do that.

It should be noted that no foes of Net neutrality laws participated in a morning panel about Congress's music-policy agenda. Telephone and cable companies, network hardware makers and free-market groups have staunchly opposed such laws, arguing, among other things, that there has been no concrete proof of a widespread discrimination problem. Republican members of Congress have generally sympathized with those arguments.

Recent posts from News Blog
End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip
Google Translate speaks 10 new languages
Yahoo investors begin to weigh in on Icahn proxy fight
Hacker confab 'Last HOPE' to track attendees with RFID
Can the Feds enforce Net neutrality? Maybe not
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 3 comments (Page 1 of 1)
RIGHT ON.
by ethana2 September 17, 2007 2:53 PM PDT
When I can choose between 7 ISP's, /then/ the 'competition' argument might fly. The US broadband market is horrible next to what it could be, and everyone with their head on straight knows it. Net neutrality, FTW!
Reply to this comment
Need ?
by vgraybeard September 17, 2007 4:37 PM PDT
"there has been no concrete proof of a widespread discrimination problem" is a lot like: "We don't need a sprinkler system because the entire building has yet to burn". Now, if our elected reps could just learn to give the consumer half the protection they give their own saleries..........nahhhhh...never happen. ed
Reply to this comment
ISP's Market Fair? lol!
by JRude667 September 17, 2007 4:39 PM PDT
I'm SURE the grand total of THREE major ISP's will act in the 'net's and the consumer's best interest. Why would they gag competition and charge all the market will bare just to maximize profits for shareholders?! If the U.S. is number 20 in Internet penetration and service in REAL bandwidth delivered worldwide why should we expect any improvement? Net Neutrality? We can't have an unfettered communication and information system unless the last dollar is squeezed. But we can have plenty of IPTV from the providers! He who has the money wins. Before the game begins.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. CBS to buy CNET Networks

  2. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  3. Intel Germany executive reportedly confirms Atom-based iPhone

  4. Xbox 360 hits 10 million sold in U.S.

  5. Photos: Microsoft previews 2008 Xbox games

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On TechRepublic: 3 habits of highly ineffective employees
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: