September 20, 2007 2:27 PM PDT

Hybrid hard drives: Why they are failing

SANTA CLARA, Calif.--Back in 2005, Samsung and Microsoft announced something that got the storage fans in the world excited: they had designed a hard drive with a bit of flash memory in it that would serve as a data cache.

The hybrid hard drive would cut down power consumption, increase battery life, and, most importantly, whack boot-up time, the companies said.

But so far, you don't see a lot of them on store shelves and the benefits are somewhat disappointing, said hard drive executives at Diskcon 2007, taking place in Santa Clara this week.

"The initial versions haven't delivered the performance consumers expected," said Dr. Richard New, director of research for Hitachi Global Storage Technologies.

The problem, said New, might be correctable if drive makers put in more flash. Right now, hybrid drives have about 256MB of memory. If you put in 4GB or so, the flash could hold a lot more storage, which in turn would reduce power consumption and help boot-up time. That would raise prices, though.

The small amount of flash also means that boot-up time isn't that much shorter, noted Joel Hagberg, vice president of marketing at Fujitsu Computing Products of America. From a cold start, boot-up time might drop from 28 seconds with a standard drive to 21 seconds with a hybrid, according to Hagberg.

"I don't see anyone paying for that," Hagberg said.

The sleep function on Vista also indirectly chips into the desirability of hybrids, added Richard Rutledge, senior vice president of marketing at Western Digital, the number two maker of drives. The company, which doesn't market a hybrid, conducted a bunch of tests comparing boot-up times of different versions of Vista from a cold start with boot-up times with computers resting in Vista's sleep state. Boot-up from a cold start with Vista PCs ranged all the way up to 70 seconds, depending on the version of Vista (Vista Home Premium is the slow one, by the way.)

Vista PCs, however, would come out of the sleep state to being operational in four seconds. Western Digital tried seven variants for Vista and it always came to around four seconds. Thus, with the sleep state working as it does, you don't need a hybrid, he said.

Recent posts from News Blog
Wuthering Heights, and now Wikipedia, via e-mail and RSS in 5-minute chunks
A reminder of why Microsoft wanted Yahoo
Craigslist files lawsuit against eBay, claims unfair competition
Yahoo releases Delicious plug-in for IE
Google opens geographic search interface
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 9 comments (Page 1 of 1)
nice idea, but 256MB was stupid
by W2Kuser September 20, 2007 4:57 PM PDT
256MB? How do the morons who make these decisions keep their jobs?
Reply to this comment
dumb arses...
by rturner2 September 20, 2007 5:46 PM PDT
Hard drive manufactures have no idea putting only 256MB. Stop caring about price so much and let consumers decide for themselves!!! Put in 4GB to 16GB (and advertise this fact with the hard drive marketing so that people know). A lot of people are wanting full NAND drives but they are too expensive for the space at the moment, so start making hybrids properly and, if done correctly, you will keep your market even when NAND drives are larger and cheaper!!
Reply to this comment
It would make them more expensive?
by GotAMD September 20, 2007 7:29 PM PDT
How much more expensive could the additional flash make them? Even with the small amount of flash, they still have to be built to take advantage of it. The only additional cost would be adding the extra flash memory. The rest is already there. Considering you can buy a fast 4GB USB flash drive for under $100, I don't understand why they're dragging their feet because of the "price". It can't be *that* much more expensive to add the additional flash.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Why wait for Vista?
by Kelekolio September 21, 2007 12:24 AM PDT
Let Apple do it with the kind of os and flashdrive performance that OSX is showing in iPods and iPhones. Then Vista can copy the technique as usual.
Reply to this comment
Just use Flash for program, HDD for data
by rslc September 21, 2007 7:50 AM PDT
Just hybrid cars, these are half-hearted solutions. Go series hybrid or full electric. For Harddisk, go for full flash or flash for programs and regular HDD for data.
Reply to this comment View reply
Vista isn't the only OS
by hawkeyeaz1 September 21, 2007 11:16 AM PDT
And, while BSD and Linux are both viable, there is still XP, which will probably be out there for years to come considering Vista's current state.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On GameSpot: Download game demos, patches, and more!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: