October 30, 2007 12:25 PM PDT

Mother protects YouTube clip by suing Prince

Prince can't push this mother around.

The pop star wanted YouTube to remove a clip of an infant boy dancing to his 1984 hit song "Let's Go Crazy." When the clip got scrubbed, the baby's mother cried foul and filed suit asking for damages. The woman's lawyers at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) say the dancing-baby clip is the poster child for fair use.

Corynne McSherry, the EFF attorney representing the baby's mother, Stephanie Lenz, said the music on the clip is barely audible and that Lenz, from rural Pennsylvannia, posted the video for noncommercial uses. Copyright owners are often too quick on the trigger when it comes to sending takedown notices to YouTube and other Web sites, according to McSherry.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act enables owners of intellectual property to demand that unauthorized copies of their work be removed from Web sites. But Congress also built in safeguards to prevent copyright owners from making misrepresentations.

"We've seen a lot of abuse of the takedown procedures," McSherry said. "It's very easy to get material taken down, and unfortunately folks aren't careful enough when issuing notices. This interferes with free-speech rights. The Internet can't continue to grow or be a robust forum if users can't share views or larger political commentary without being worried that every little piece of content is going to be removed."

There is also something unique about this case. Universal Music Group is the defendant because it represents some of Prince's publishing rights (his current music label is Sony BMG). A year ago, Universal signed a licensing deal with YouTube that allows users to include the label's music in videos. Under the terms of the agreement, YouTube agreed to remove material from any Universal artist who declines to participate.

According to sources knowledgeable with the agreement, only one artist represented by Universal has elected to opt out of the YouTube deal: Prince.

A representative of Universal declined to comment.

The iconic musician sometimes calls up Universal when he spots unauthorized uses of his work and asks them to send takedown notices, the sources said. The author of such hits as "Purple Rain" and "Little Red Corvette," Prince has hired a company called Web Sheriff to patrol the Web looking for unauthorized copies of his work and then try to get them taken down. The company said it plans to spearhead a legal challenge to YouTube and other Web sites on behalf of Prince and the 1970s disco band, the Village People.

John Giacobbi, Web Sheriff's president, said by phone Tuesday that his company had nothing to do with the Lenz baby clip and declined to comment further.

The lawsuit appears to have a ways to go before the issue is decided. Universal has filed a motion of dismiss and EFF is scheduled to issue their reply in the next few weeks.

Recent posts from News Blog
Wafer-thin: Samsung's OLED laptop prototype
Georgia law aims to lure video game makers
iPhone expands its empire, once again
Jerry Yang prepares troops for proxy battle
End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 27 comments (Page 1 of 2)
That's it?
by macdannyk1 October 30, 2007 1:27 PM PDT
That's the big 'inappropriate use?' - a radio playing in the background? WTHeck? Sheesh...
Reply to this comment View reply
This is wrong! [read how and wherefore] .... beware YouTube, your time is
by SpecialServci October 30, 2007 1:52 PM PDT
coming.... Why?> Any owner of I.P. (intellectual *Property*) should be able to control access to songs or video works created by the entity, and expect payment .... if there isn't a standard system or due-process enabled by commonlaw, or if publishers don't consider all background 'sounds' *before* publishing, then this can and will be abused by unethical partners, who think they can push the boundaries, or assign discrete words to assign to "evidence" of the fact, or otherwise. Everyone must be paid. Otherwise, a poverty mentality and lower standard of living and economy will always continue to exist, until the next president comes into power and changes that fact. best wishes..................
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
It's not about the Web
by rdupuy11 October 30, 2007 2:16 PM PDT
Some people get confused and think this is an internet issue. The web is just the mechanism. This isn't about the web. Whether this movie was shown to friends on the internet. Or whether she played it her friends and family in her own home. Or whether she was absolutely the only person to ever look at it... the question is, when something has no commercial value, and is incidental...is it allowed? Fair use says: yes. Prince says: No. whose right? Well, it cannot be Prince, geez.
Reply to this comment View reply
Good for Her
by Renegade Knight October 30, 2007 2:21 PM PDT
The simple truth is music is part of the mosiac of our lives. It's roots come long before copyright laws were even invented to rob us of our natural use of music in our lives. I'm glad my forefathers didn't argue copyrights when they invented music or it would have never gotten off the ground. Instead of singing we would have just invented legal yelling.
Reply to this comment
derivatives
by bdplaid October 30, 2007 2:30 PM PDT
Then what about derivative works? There are different kinds of specific licenses available that will allow a 3rd-party to reinterpret the original artists work - for a fee. This then creates a new work. This is the law. Man, you need to stop ranting about stuff about which you know nothing.
Reply to this comment
Jury of your peers
by amerist78 October 30, 2007 2:34 PM PDT
Any jury with half a brain amongst them would find this to be a perfect example of fair use. Universal and its ilk have obviously overstepped their bounds and hopefully an example will be made of them in this case.
Reply to this comment
History
by bdplaid October 30, 2007 2:37 PM PDT
Actually, the history of the great composers is that most of them were paid for their work - by wealthy patrons who hired them to write music for spefic things. Bach was in the service of the catholic Church, and was charged with composing an original mass for each Sunday. Hence the reason why there is so much of his work around. But as to ownership - as I recall, the Church claimed ownership, but i don't know when the issue of copyright reared its head. It's an interesting question. I've written about this - Personally, I feel that copyright is too restrictive. At some point, ALL works need to enter the public domain, but right now with the law written as it is, media can remain protected into perpetuity. And that's bad for society, and only good for corporations.
Reply to this comment View reply
The has-been formally known as Prince.
by imacpwr October 30, 2007 2:42 PM PDT
This is pathetic, if I hadn't of read that the music playing in the background is Prince's "Let's Go Crazy" I'd never have noticed it..!! Not only is Prince a has-been he's a looser as well..!!!
Reply to this comment
Juries
by bdplaid October 30, 2007 2:43 PM PDT
Yes, but where does one propose to find such a jury? Certainly not in California. This is one more example of the greed of those in the corporate music world. back when i was a full-time musician, I remember how liberal and free musicians were on their way up. after they "made it," the greed set in and they wouldn't give away a damned thing. We're seeing that now, on the corporate level. Another example: If artists are being hurt so badly by illegal downloading and copyright infringement, then how come so many of them still become multi-millionaires overnight? The question then becomes, does the infringement hurt, or help? I think the answer is obvious.
Reply to this comment
Learn YOUR history
by felgercarbnaysay October 30, 2007 3:11 PM PDT
Bach was Lutheran. Luther nailed the 95 theses to the door in Wittenberg over 100 years before Bach was even born!
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. CBS to buy CNET Networks

  2. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  3. Intel Germany executive reportedly confirms Atom-based iPhone

  4. If Gates is right, how much longer for keyboards & mice?

  5. Photos: Microsoft previews 2008 Xbox games

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On MovieTome: SEX AND THE CITY clips are here!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: