October 30, 2007 4:12 PM PDT

Trent Reznor: Take my music, please

Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails

(Credit: Rob Sheridan)

Correction: Saul Williams' album debuts Thursday and is available for free or a $5 donation.

Rocker Trent Reznor doesn't pretend to know the answers to what ails the music industry.

But that hasn't stopped the iconoclastic front man for the band Nine Inch Nails from marching to the front lines--in lock step with British band Radiohead--in an assault on the traditional music business.

Reznor, who made news earlier this month when he left his record label, spoke Tuesday with CNET News.com about the decision. He also bashed the music industry, detailed how he persuaded performer Saul Williams to give away his latest album for free, praised Radiohead for distributing music directly to fans via the Web, and indicated that instead of fighting the so-called free culture--people who share music online--he plans to embrace it.

"Personally, I would like people to support artists," Reznor said. "After all, we as artists dedicate our lives to producing the best music we can. It's been a painful process for me personally (to see the changes in the music industry). But should I be angry at the audience that wants to hear music so much, an audience that is so passionate about hearing it they go online to get it two weeks before the music debuts? No, I want them to be that way."

Reznor has become a revolutionary figure to the file-sharing community. A video appeared recently at YouTube that showed him during a concert performance lamenting the high prices of CDs. Fans whooped it up when Reznor told them to go ahead and steal his music.

Since then, Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead have become symbols of a growing movement among performers who are trying to use the Web to cut out the traditional middlemen of distribution: record labels.

Musicians Saul Williams and Trent Reznor

(Credit: Atticus Ross)

Radiohead shook the industry earlier this month by releasing a digital version of their latest album and asking fans pay whatever price they believed the album was worth. It was unprecedented move largely because it appeared to address an issue that music industry has largely tried to ignore. Music fans, many of whom obtain songs for free through illegal file sharing, perceive the dollar value of songs as almost nothing. Unless something dramatic occurs, many believe there is a chance a large number of fans will never again be swayed to plunk down money for music.

Reznor, 42, said that the music industry is spinning its wheels trying to fight that perception. He said that in the future songs can be a way to entice fans to buy concert tickets and merchandise and he recognized that this may be how musicians make their living. He has recently produced an album for Williams, a rapper/filmmaker/spoken-word artist, called The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust, which goes on sale Thursday on Williams' site.

Not coincidentally, the digital version of the album, which is free of copy-protection software, is priced for free or fans can make a $5 donation. It was Reznor's idea to give away Williams' music in a similar way as Radiohead.

"(The record industry's) treatment of artists has less sympathy and it's more like 'What can we get out of you?' My only concern has always been that my audience is treated fairly."
--Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails

"Radiohead is one of my favorite bands," Reznor said. "When they announced they were releasing that album for free, I got dozens of text messages. It gave me goose bumps. It's such an exciting way to sell a record."

Now, here's the rub. Reznor isn't the naïve artist who doesn't understand dollars and cents. He said that he knows giving away music may not make business sense. In addition, such a model could work for marquee bands like Radiohead but not for up-and-coming acts.

"Radiohead has a built-in audience and they have the luxury of being able to experiment with a new distribution model," Reznor said. "I think there were some serious flaws with how they executed but it was a good idea."

Reznor addressed some of the questions about whether artists are prepared to become merchants. Who is going to oversee sales, promotion, marketing, site supervision, and the countless other chores that record labels historically handled?

But Reznor isn't afraid to get his hands dirty. He said that he was part of the negotiations with Musicane,the company handling the online distribution of Williams' upcoming album. Musicane is overseeing fulfillment, payment processing, and customer service.

The beauty of Musicane, according to Reznor, is that it provides the backbone for distribution without requiring musicians to invest "hundreds of thousands of dollars."

"Look, we're looking for what works and this seemed like it made sense," Reznor said. "Ask me in a week about how it went and hopefully I'll be saying the same thing."

It's doubtful that even if problems crop up Reznor can be dissuaded from his belief that the Internet is good for artists. He thinks that the Web creates direct links between musicians and their fans. This is beneficial even if sometimes it's hard for performers to stand out among the countless acts trying to promote themselves online.

"The greatest thing about the Internet is that everybody is their own distributor," Reznor said. "Being your own distributor is power and the thing that labels once held over artists. The power of getting your message out to an audience is very empowering as an artist. These are exciting times and things are happening that I couldn't imagine just a few years ago."

As for the future, well, Reznor fully acknowledges that he--like everybody else in music--is unsure of how things will turn out. But he says he's sure of one thing: the old way of doing business is dead.

"I don't know what the future holds," he said. "I don't know what model is going to work. I do know relationships between music labels and artist like myself aren't going well. These days when digital elements come into play labels have dealt with them generally poorly. It has gotten to a place where it couldn't be worse. Their treatment of artists has less sympathy and it's more like 'What can we get out of you?' My only concern has always been that my audience is treated fairly."

Recent posts from News Blog
Facebook CTO to leave company
Nvidia CEO denies buyout of Via
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Facebook borrows $100 million
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 39 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Rich sods can afford to give stuff away.
by Mousefinger October 30, 2007 5:02 PM PDT
Wealthy individuals like Trent can afford to give away their wares. Other, smaller bands, can't. It's nice to see how Trent used the "record industry" to get ahead and now chooses to vilify "it". Bite the hand that feeds ya. The phony musician. /Mouse
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
Try, www.Songslide.com
by Gringras October 30, 2007 5:35 PM PDT
The music is great, the artists get paid on a sliding scale according to your kind generosity or your slimy crookedness. I enjoy shopping there. Pass the word. Maybe it IS the beginning of the end of music labels, but it is up to us. The Public- the fans.
Reply to this comment
Trent Reznor: Take my music, please
by witchgoddess October 30, 2007 5:47 PM PDT
Trent Reznor rules!!! I am so glad he and Radiohead are rebelling against the greedy riaa. I hope more artists and bands take the same stand as Trent and Radiohead!
Reply to this comment
Amen Trent
by PT78 October 30, 2007 6:03 PM PDT
Now will you please talk some sense into Lars? He made a complete ass of himself....
Reply to this comment
AmieStreet Variable pricing.. great model
by roguepuppet October 30, 2007 6:12 PM PDT
I am currently in love with the AmieStreet ( www.amiestreet.com) variable pricing model. The more a song is downloaded, the higher the price ( with a max of .98 cents). Produce great music, you will make money off of it. I have gotten songs for free as well as paying full price for really good music. check it out if you have not already.
Reply to this comment
he's taking a leap
by pjhenry1216 October 30, 2007 7:06 PM PDT
and we gotta make sure he has a place to land. i wasn't a huge radiohead fan, but i support the general cause. i *paid* for their album. if they don't make money, they won't be able to continue to do it. they're trusting that SOME people will pay enough. the amount that needs to be paid per album is a lot less since they're cutting out the middleman PLUS putting it online, but there still needs to be costs. if you TRULY enjoy their music, then pay for it. if you don't care enough to pay or just sorta like a song or two, then just download it for free, no harm, no foul. but please, if you really are a fan, please pay something to show your support. i know if Trent ever releases anything with the radiohead model, i will pay for it.
Reply to this comment
Just a couple of facts
by jessamineny October 30, 2007 8:05 PM PDT
Except for presales, the album goes on sale Thursday (11/1), not Wednesday, and it goes on sale for $5 or free (not for whatever people want to pay... unless they want to hit the $5 button over and over and over...). Thanks. :)
Reply to this comment
Will take the path of Open Source software
by Blito October 31, 2007 1:16 AM PDT
First the musicians will go independent and do it cheaply and more quality then eventually the larger companies will come in and buy it up guaranteeing it stays no DRM with musicians getting their FAIR CUT in money. Right now it is less advantages for musicians to sell through Yahoo and Rhapsody music because Record labels aren't totally embracing digital music and musicians get less money. Plus musicians wont sell their rights over to companies as nobody should. That was the first and last mistake.
Reply to this comment
I predicted this
by maverick_nick October 31, 2007 1:31 AM PDT
I remember commenting about this happening on another article a while back. Record labels now appear as ice cold evil corporations that nobody wants to have anything to do with. People are generally good, and I think that when we're not forced to do something it's easier and we'd be more willing to do it. I'm certain that artist would be more successful distributing their music at a recommended price, than pursuing the "or else" tactic of the record labels.
Reply to this comment View reply
DId anyone read any follow-up on the Radiohead album?
by kabong October 31, 2007 6:52 AM PDT
I'm amazed that you mention this whole Radiohead ploy as some wonderful thing. I'm not a Radiohead fan myself, but the follow- up was that the "free" version available for download was of very poor quality. Whereas I think Trent Reznor is trying to actually get the music out there in a usable format. I'm not a huge Trent or NIN fan either, but I do respect the guy a lot more because he has always tended to do his own thing his own way. I think that Radiohead has pretty much turned out to be the pretentious d- bags I always kind thought they were.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On MP3.com: Worst MP3 Players of 2007
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: