January 4, 2008 9:27 AM PST

Clinton: Time to digitize all Americans' medical records

At the start of a new drive in New Hampshire ahead of Tuesday's primary, presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton addresses hundreds of supporters in a Nashua airplane hangar.

(Credit: Anne Broache/CNET News.com)

NASHUA, N.H.--In a new push to win over New Hampshire voters on Friday, Hillary Clinton highlighted a technological facet of her pledge to revamp the nation's healthcare system: ditch paper medical records.

Digitizing the vital documents will not only cut an estimated $77 billion in costs, but "much more important than that, we would save lives," the New York senator said Friday morning to a few hundred cheering, sign-waving supporters huddled around the stage in a drafty airplane hangar here.

Clinton's early-morning return to the Granite State, which is scheduled to hold its primary election Tuesday, followed a third-place finish in Iowa's first-in-the-nation contest on Thursday night. According to a Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll released on Friday, Clinton is currently leading the Democratic pack in the New Hampshire race, with 32 percent to Sen. Barack Obama's 26 percent.

Clad in a dark suit, Clinton touched on the economy ("it's going to be a tough economic year," she predicted, citing the most recent unemployment statistics) and her electability (she has the mettle to "withstand the Republican attack machine," she said) before taking questions from the audience.

Her pledge to create a nationwide, electronic health-record-keeping system came in response to a comment from an audience member who, by Clinton's description, "lost her daughter because her medical records were not readily available."

"We go online to buy things from Mongolia, we go online to do our banking, but we can't go online in a secure, encrypted, confidential way to get access to our medical records," she lamented.

Some hospitals and medical offices, of course, are already wired, but right now, most people aren't able to view their records electronically. Naturally, companies like Microsoft have been plotting ways to fill that void. At least one recent study found security and privacy vulnerabilities remain as e-health advocates forge ahead with their plans.

In any case, it's not a new idea on Clinton's part, as she has been working with other senators for years on passing legislation aimed at getting electronic medical records systems off the ground.

Nor is it a partisan issue. President Bush long called for greater computerization of health records, and former president Bill Clinton has also advocated for such action in recent months. (He, by the way, was on hand Friday to introduce his wife and daughter Chelsea, who made a smiling but silent appearance just before her mother's speech.)

In between discussion of health care, troop withdrawal from Iraq, and protecting manufacturing jobs within the United States, Clinton also revived talk of her previously-unveiled plans to enlist higher-tech alternatives in her energy policy.

As part of her push to wean the United States off foreign oil, Clinton vowed again to yank subsidies from oil companies and to require them to pay into a "Strategic Energy Fund" that will bankroll research on new technologies and clean, renewable energy sources.

"We're serious this time," she said. "America is really serious."

Recent posts from News Blog
Virtual worlds for pre-schoolers? They're here
Facebook CTO to leave company
Nvidia CEO denies buyout of Via
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 37 comments (Page 1 of 3)
How many TRILLION $ to set this up in initial costs?
by basraw January 4, 2008 10:01 AM PST
Someone is forgetting start up costs. Heck - the FBI couldn't get there simple "VIRTUAL CASE FILE" system on bad guys implemented. How many BILLIONS wasted there?
Reply to this comment View reply
Would we have a choice?
by budeverett January 4, 2008 10:11 AM PST
What if I don't want my health and medical records digitized and part of a nation-wide health care system? I prefer another candidate's view that each American would have control over his own medical records.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Two things..
by billmosby January 4, 2008 10:27 AM PST
Ok, fine, digitize my medical records. Then we can look forward to headlines screaming "200 Million Medical Records on Stolen Laptop". Billions for alternative energy research? You mean we don't already have a whole bunch of alternatives ready to go but for the repressive tactics of the oil companies? Who knew?
Reply to this comment
Reality Check
by drwam January 4, 2008 10:53 AM PST
Mrs. Clinton's comments reflect the same lack of thought that Bush has brought to this problem. I work with electronic medical records every day. They are not a panacea. Systems are proprietary and data is often not easily portable. These problems mean that many of the advantages of electronic records cannot be realized. So, before we run and spend hundreds of billions of dollars on JUNK, let's have some common sense ground rules. Among these should be a common, extensible and open format for records. That way the data would be truly portable and no institution would be bound to one company's system. In a sense, the oldest form of electronic medical record are CT scans. Right now, each scanner company uses its own proprietary format that may not be readable by another institution's equipment. You would think that after decades of CT scans that the Feds would have required that scanners all be capable of a common data format, but no. Even now, we have to have films of CT scans printed at hospital A and hand carried to hospital B in all too many cases. It really slows things down. Bottom line is that it is in patient's interests to have records electronic (as long as things are secure). We need to take simple steps toward that future now and not rush into an hysteria of spending.
Reply to this comment
$77 Billion ?????
by Shawn Lane January 4, 2008 10:57 AM PST
Where did Clinton come up with $77 billion? So if everyones medical record was digital it would save us $77 billion. I am not sure about that. But the number sure does sound good!!!!
Reply to this comment View reply
Opps
by pgp_protector January 4, 2008 10:58 AM PST
You were allergic to this drug ? Sorry about that, we had an intern format the HDs yesterday.
Reply to this comment
LOL!!!
by mgee99 January 4, 2008 11:06 AM PST
Why not prove the concept by digitizing the IRS first! When that succeeds (15 years down the road) or fails miserably, then we can "talk" about my medical records.
Reply to this comment View reply
Strategic Energy Fund = Joke
by allen b January 4, 2008 11:18 AM PST
She has to be kidding on that one. What a way to encourage the American Dream. Hey you have become successful, now give us money so we can bankroll your competition and hopefully put you out of business.
Reply to this comment
Stalinist centralization
by nicmart January 4, 2008 11:29 AM PST
At her core, this woman has a chilling desire to centralize and control. She's a lot more George Bush than she is Thomas Jefferson.
Reply to this comment
Duh,,,Its already happening.
by William Crow January 4, 2008 11:42 AM PST
The move to be go digital in medicine is already happening. Hillary Clinton comes in as its happening making the suggestion and ultimately to take credit for a change already in progress. This similar to the move to go "green." Whereas the move toward energy efficiency is occurring based on the higher price of energy, making alternatives worthwhile based simply on economics, it has little or nothing to do with the near religious moniker of being "green." This era of high energy costs making energy saving technology feasible has been discussed for decades. Just as Hillary is coming in to appear prophetic on this issue, Al Gore came in, attached an Armagedean scenario to the efficiency movement. The gullible always seem to follow, marching in lock step. The young and hip seem especially vulnerable to these tricks, providing opportunity for these and other politicians willing to exploit ignorance. All hail the modern stooge.
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On TechRepublic: Top 5 operating systems you never used
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: