January 8, 2008 10:04 PM PST

Registrar denies 'front-running' Net registration

Contrary to claims that emerged Wednesday, Network Solutions said it isn't "front-running" the Internet address registration process, a practice in which a company registers a potential domain immediately after a prospective buyer searches to see if it's available. In fact, the practice that triggered the accusation is an attempt to counteract front-running, the company said.

Front-running can give a registration company an advantage over the customer who wants to register the site--for example by preventing the customer from registering it through a competing registrar or by selling it to the customer at an inflated price.

The company faced criticism of front-running Tuesday, with discussions cropping up at Domain Name News, Slashdot, and DomainState discussion boards.

"Network Solutions has instituted a four-day lock on all domain names searched on their site. They are effectively using phishing techniques to hijack or steal domain names and forcing domain name registrants to register their names at Network Solutions. The standard domain name registration fee at Network Solutions is $34.99--significantly higher than the leading alternatives," complained one commenter.

Although Network Solutions does temporarily register a site a customer searched for, spokeswoman Susan Wade denied there's anything nefarious afoot. "Network Solutions is not front-running," she said.

Network Solutions holds the domain for up to four days, during which time a customer can register it only from Network Solutions and after which it again becomes generally available if unregistered, Wade said. But that feature, she said, is a "pre-emptive" measure to protect customers--from front-runners.

That's because front-runners can tell when a customer has searched for a domain at Network Solutions, for example because Network Solutions then must check availability at other sites when a customer searches, Wade said.

"This search data is captured at the various registries. We believe there are registries and/or Internet service providers that may be selling this data to front-runners. So, by holding domains searched on Network Solutions, this pre-empts the search data being captured," she said.

Recent posts from News Blog
Firefox 3 release candidate goes public
Yahoo tries to conceal lawsuit documents
HP to launch fall line of teen PC products
Hooray! Yahoo Mail ditches tagline ads
Conde Nast buys Ars Technica
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 20 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Happened to me yesterday
by Jesse Chan January 9, 2008 12:26 AM PST
Actually, it happened to me yesterday. Network Solutions found that I searched for a domain name and picked it up! Then they sold it to me for about $40, when I could have bought it for $10 on GoDaddy if they didn't pick it up. Network Solutions are front-runners; they wouldn't give out the information from their database to third-parties anyway, to expose the searches.
Reply to this comment View reply
Apple users - Use NetworkUtility.app to do a search instead of using a site
by MyRightEye January 9, 2008 12:43 AM PST
NetworkUtility.app checks the InterNIC database and will not alert anyone about your search. It's in: Applications>Utilities>NetworkUtility.app
Reply to this comment
NetworkSolutions is a company with questionable business ethics
by mvbirgelen January 9, 2008 4:04 AM PST
The questionable business ethics started around the time they were aquired by VeriSign (a company which has some kind of monopoly on SSL certificates and tried to sell your kids expensive subscriptions for mobile ringtones and other stuff you don't need via Jamba/Jamster). One of the most controversial moves of Network Solutions (in the VeriSign era) was the implementation of a wildcard record in the .com and .net root zone. They directed this wildcard record to a page containing advertising. This fundamentally changed the way DNS used to work and broke a lot of things around the planet. The only reason to do this was greed, they wanted to profit from the many people that mistyped URLs ending on .com and .net by cashing some extra advertising dollars. What they are doing now is also very questionable and I would NEVER do business with a company that employs such activities. I've just tried it myself by entering some stupid domain name ending on .com on their website. I tried to register this domain on another registrars website and it was no longer available. The whois tells me that it is taken by "This Domain is available at NetworkSolutions.com", also featuring some nice advertising: This Domain is Available - Register it Now! 600,000 domain names are registered daily! Don't delay; there's no guarantee that a domain name you see today will still be here tomorrow! Register it Now at www.NetworkSolutions.com. This alone is probably against any rules ICANN has formulated for the public WHOIS registry... Even better, they already put up a website on the address telling me "This Domain is available - Get it Now!". There is no other name for this than "front-running". I hope ICANN will investigate this and put an end to shuch practices.
Reply to this comment
How Network Solutions Messed it Up
by andrew999999999 January 9, 2008 7:32 AM PST
If these were Netsol's intentions, here's how they messed it up: http://domainnamewire.com/2008/01/09/editorial-where-network-solutions-went-wrong/
Reply to this comment
yep, this is pretty bad!
by Cr0n_J0b January 9, 2008 8:35 AM PST
It's pretty easy to see this yourself. I just did a seach for "rubiesontuesday.com" on Godaddy and it was available. I did the same search on NetworkSolutions and it was available, albeit at a higher price. I went back to godaddy, and guess what? It was taken. I'm not sure about the legalities here, but this definitely sounds like and unfair or deceptive business practice.
Reply to this comment
It's a Delicate Balance
by `WarpKat January 9, 2008 9:07 AM PST
Before we get our Cheerio's peed on, let's look at this a bit: they keep the domain for four days when you search it in order to prevent the 'front-running' behavior on more nefarious sites. Although the practice of this is somewhat questionable, the motive, I feel, is quite sound and the intentions are just. Cybersquatters are more of a threat to a free internet than are companies trying to do the right thing, so before we really start to hammer down on NS for this practice, what we should REALLY be doing is giving voice to help provide a more appropriate method of dealing with domain name searches for the purposes of purchase and saving the grief of someone sitting on them to sell to the 'highest bidder.' I worked for a guy that purchased domain upon domain just to try to stifle his competition and I'm almost tempted to say he's monopolizing the market for the type of service rendered and although I'm unwilling to say who it was, I can say that I think his practice was more unethical than NS. NS should drop their prices or perhaps come up with a way to negotiate a fair trade over to a qualified registrar in order for a potential buyer to get it for the lowest price possible - a benefit to the buyer and a benefit to qualified registrars with a kick-back to NS. They wouldn't be getting their asking price for the domain, but at least they'd get a small kick-back for it if they're still holding onto it...
Reply to this comment View reply
easy to understand.
by inachu January 9, 2008 9:18 AM PST
Since this can be done via a script and if someone searches then someone can gab it and resell it for big money. Network solutions will grab it to prevent no the Original customer wanting it but to keep others from stealing the potential domain. In this case a dead game company was bought out by reseller and on the market for $5,000..... thats wrong!
Reply to this comment
NetSol is lying
by pinkydoodle January 9, 2008 10:21 AM PST
When they hold a domain for the 4 days, it is parked with a link to buy the name. ANYONE who goes to that parked page can buy the name- through NetSol and no one else. As long as you want to pay $35 (who does that anymore?) you can own the name that someone else searched for. It is not being held for any customer, it is being tasted by Netsol for 4 days. This is disgraceful- and nothing will be done about it. That is the sick part.
Reply to this comment
They scammed me yesterday...
by BitRealty January 9, 2008 4:32 PM PST
This just happened to me. I usually check availability of domains with Netsol and then register them at GoDaddy as I like Network Solutions search tool... Earlier in the day I had checked a domain and it was available... later in the day I decided to register it and went to Godaddy to do so and it was "taken". So I double checked on Netsol again and it was available. I called Netsol and said that I wanted to register it and that I was confused as to why it was showing up as available there but not elsewhere... the rep that I spoke to said that they were now locking domains that were searched and found to be available on Netsol "for our users protection". She said that someone "from some foreign country" was watching which domains were being searched for on Netsol and then registering them and trying to re-sell them at marked up rates to the original searcher(s). This seemed within the realm of possibility but probably way way too much effort for a hijacker to undergo simply because the value of most domains is so questionable and subjective. I eventually got her down to $8.75 per year for the registration (3 year min) but this was still 22% more than what I would have paid at GoDaddy (at $7.15 per .com) for only a one year commitment. I agree with all the posters that I've read and Network Solutions is not only cheating, but also their actions could be deemed illegal. Now that this is out in the open, this has got to be something that can't last or should cause an uproar of some sort.
Reply to this comment
They scammed me yesterday...
by BitRealty January 9, 2008 4:33 PM PST
This just happened to me. I usually check availability of domains with Netsol and then register them at GoDaddy as I like Network Solutions search tool... Earlier in the day I had checked a domain and it was available... later in the day I decided to register it and went to Godaddy to do so and it was "taken". So I double checked on Netsol again and it was available. I called Netsol and said that I wanted to register it and that I was confused as to why it was showing up as available there but not elsewhere... the rep that I spoke to said that they were now locking domains that were searched and found to be available on Netsol "for our users protection". She said that someone "from some foreign country" was watching which domains were being searched for on Netsol and then registering them and trying to re-sell them at marked up rates to the original searcher(s). This seemed within the realm of possibility but probably way way too much effort for a hijacker to undergo simply because the value of most domains is so questionable and subjective. I eventually got her down to $8.75 per year for the registration (3 year min) but this was still 22% more than what I would have paid at GoDaddy (at $7.15 per .com) for only a one year commitment. I agree with all the posters that I've read and Network Solutions is not only cheating, but also their actions could be deemed illegal. Now that this is out in the open, this has got to be something that can't last or should cause an uproar of some sort. Rob http://www.bitrealty.com
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  2. Photos: Cracking open the Atari 2600

  3. This VC forecast scares the pants off of me

  4. End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip

  5. The Internet thrives on dark energy

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On TechRepublic: 3 habits of highly ineffective employees
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: