Handshakes, not the Internet, win N.H. for Clinton and McCain

Republican presidential hopeful John McCain, with his wife Cindy, thanks supporters in a victory speech Tuesday evening.
(Credit: Declan McCullagh/News.com )NASHUA, N.H.--Hillary Clinton and John McCain won Tuesday's New Hampshire primaries the old-fashioned way: trekking to scores of coffee houses, diners, and high school gymnasiums. They shook hands, answered questions, and eventually convinced a plurality of voters.
This was politicking at its most traditional, employing venerable tactics like McCain's Straight Talk Express bus tour and Clinton's "Time to Pick a President" meetings with voters. By the time the polls closed, it was a rare Granite State resident who managed to avoid in-person contact with a would-be president or a pushy surrogate.
In other words, it was anything but high-tech. Sure, there were robo-calls and e-mail alerts, but, for the most part, the local events that convinced voters to pick Clinton and McCain could have been convened at any point in the last century.
One example: the day after losing in the Iowa caucuses, Clinton asked supporters to meet her at a hangar at the airport here in the frosty pre-dawn gloom. It was a miserable day not only for campaign aides but also for locals, with temperatures at the event hovering around minus 6 degrees Fahrenheit. The Democratic senator showed up, responded to questions, and departed in a coach emblazoned with "BIG CHALLENGES, REAL SOLUTIONS, TIME TO PICK A PRESIDENT" in bold letters.

Supporters of Hillary Clinton prepare for her victory speech that took place later this evening in a gymnasium in Manchester, N.H.
(Credit: Declan McCullagh/News.com)Another example: employees of defense contractor BAE Systems crowded into a small auditorium to hear McCain speak, and, when that filled up, crowded into the main lobby to watch his remarks on a screen. The Republican senator spoke for half an hour, and, when the event was over, the workers waited patiently for the chance to shake McCain's hand or glimpse his campaign bus on the way out.
New Hampshire residents love it. More precisely, they claim to be annoyed by candidates and journalists interrupting their meals at diners and parking on their lawns when nearby events fill up, but they savor their chance to influence a presidential election and they take this role seriously.
Not only did Clinton's and McCain's tiresome, repetitive, voice-hoarsening efforts work, they nicely put into perspective the clamor that has arisen over social networks and other Internet popularity contests.
Neither of those candidates was a favorite online. Barack Obama, who came in second in the New Hampshire Democratic primary, has 219,707 MySpace "friends" to Clinton's 160,414. Obama and John Edwards each had more viewers on YouTube than Clinton did. Obama had around four times the number of "Eventful" demands for a visit than Clinton did and more than three times the Facebook friends.
And by any Internet metric, Texas Rep. Ron Paul should have captured the lion's share of the GOP vote in New Hampshire. He's arguably the Internet's favorite candidate, with Google engineers campaigning for him here, a remarkable lead on Eventful and Facebook, and 111,757 MySpace "friends" to McCain's mere 40,770.
Instead, Paul received just 8 percent of the vote (which is somewhat surprising after a weekend poll put him at 14 percent).
The reason for this, of course, is that Paul and Obama supporters tend to be young and tech savvy, which gives them disproportionate representation online. They flood online polls. They feverishly add their preferred candidate to their social networks. They organize, and raise funds, incredibly well.

John Edwards may not be the Internet's favorite candidate, but a campaign event in Portsmouth, N.H. proves he's adept at kissing babies.
(Credit: Declan McCullagh/News.com )There's nothing wrong with that. But in presidential elections, votes matter, and those in Iowa and New Hampshire matter the most. Exercises in online nose-counting like press releases heralding the so-called "MySpace primary" don't.
To be sure, online politicking has been part of the 2008 election. The YouTube debates proved to be a provocative exercise in user-generated content, Meetup and MoveOn changed the way activism works, and e-mail lets campaigns stay in touch with voters and volunteers. As Paul devotees know, online fundraising is a powerful tool.
Journalists love these metrics (see above for the obligatory MySpace statistics) because they're easy to measure and report. But Tuesday's results should be a cautionary tale: votes matter. In-person meetings matter. Handshakes matter. MySpace friends don't.
CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report.
- Topics:
-
Politics
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us




- From New Hampshire
-
by Dr_Zinj
January 10, 2008 7:33 AM PST
- The internet did not make or break any of the candidates campaigns here in N.H. What it did do is provide an additional venue, more responsive to the voters, to discover information about the candidates: their history, their stands on issues, where they were going to appear, etc.
In the past week, we were deluged with junk mail fliers, e-mail ads, and phone calls. Saturday alone I counted over 25 political phone calls to my house, and that doesn't count the dozen or so ones that hung up as soon as the answering machine came on.
I'm a barely registered Republican, although my actual voting habits are more Independent. I evaluated all the candidates several times over the past couple of months and arrived at the conclusion that Ron Paul would be the best person in the White House for the nation. Unfortunately, at this time he is not really electable; and there are several Republicans running that are not suitable to run this country. That being the case, I voted for McCain as being the second most suitable Republican in an effort to shut out the undesireables.
On the Democratic side, it will really come down to Obama and Clinton - Edwards might make a good VP running mate, but isn't going to be able to stir the nation like these other two. Clinton makes a good speech, but looking back at her performance in Washington, as well as historically, she is as much business as usual as the current occupants of the White House. Obama really is the only viable Democratic change candidate.
Here's a little history on Ms. Clinton from my experience. My apologies to the Dales if this causes some undesired attentions to be placed back on them. Ms Hillary claims to have extensive experience in how to run the presidency by virtue of her work behind the scenes during her husband's terms of office. That being the case, she was probably intimately involved, if not instrumental, in the events leading to the Travelgate scandal. For those who fail to remember, Travelgate was the situation where the administration basically attempted to frame Billy Dale, the then manager of the White House Travel Office, in order to justify their firing him from his civil service position, converting that position into a contracted job and giving it to the cronies of the Clintons. What happened then was the administration put Mr Dale, and his extended family, through hell on earth for a couple of years, and eventually had to drop their case due to absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing. So I'm not too keen on Ms. Clinton's honesty because of that. Now Ms. Clinton claims to be concerned about the healthcare situation in this nation. But it seems to me that that's a bit of crocodile tears; as the stress of the Travelgate investigation probably caused Mrs. Blanche Dale, wife of Billy, to suffer a stroke from which she never fully recovered.
What this means is that Hillary is the penultimate politician. As I see it, as long as she's going where you want her to, you have a wonderfully aggressive fighter working for you. But the minute you are no longer of use to her, or you get in her way, you'll find you're riding a tiger that's likely to turn and devour you. At least Obama doesn't have a track record of kneecapping his opponents.
-
Reply to this comment
View
all 2 replies
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>