January 9, 2008 3:28 PM PST

AT&T considers filtering for pirated content

AT&T is considering using filtering technology to stop pirated content from traversing its network, according to a New York Times blog posted from the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

According to the blog, James Cicconi, senior vice president, external and legal affairs for AT&T, said during a panel discussion Tuesday about digital piracy that the carrier is already discussing the possibility of using filtering technology with content companies like NBC Universal.

James Cicconi

"We are very interested in a technology-based solution, and we think a network-based solution is the optimal way to approach this," Cicconi said in the New York Times blog. "We recognize we are not there yet but there are a lot of promising technologies."

Filtering is already used on sites like YouTube and Microsoft's Soapbox to keep copyrighted videos from being shared illegally. But using this kind of technology on a much wider scale at the network level is controversial and has stirred up protest from some consumer groups.

A firestorm of protest ignited last year when cable operator Comcast was accused of filtering BitTorrent traffic. The company denied it was filtering traffic, but later admitted it "shapes" traffic to ensure that its network is not overwhelmed. Federal Communications Chairman Kevin Martin said Tuesday that an investigation will be launched to see if Comcast has violated any of the agency's policies.

Groups that oppose filtering say the Internet should be kept open or "neutral." They believe allowing carriers to look into packets flowing over their network to determine if they should be blocked or not is a dangerous practice that could eventually lead to abuses like censorship.

And maybe they are right. Just look at what happened this summer on AT&T's own video streaming Web site. During a Webcast of the Lollapalooza concert in Chicago, AT&T bleeped portions of the Pearl Jam song "Daughter," in which singer Eddie Vedder altered lyrics to include anti-Bush sentiments. Other bands had also been censored on AT&T's Webcasts, including the John Butler Trio and Flaming Lips. AT&T admitted that these remarks had been deleted, but the company said these were mistakes made by an overzealous contractor hired to monitor the performances for obscene language.

AT&T's Cicconi tried to quell fears of massive censorship or carrier snooping in a conversation with the New York Times reporter by saying: "Whatever we do has to pass muster with consumers and with policy standards. There is going to be a spotlight on it."

The debate over traffic filtering is likely to heat up this year, especially as there's an increase in technology that makes deep packet inspection possible. I'm going to dig a little deeper into this subject in an upcoming story, so stay tuned.

Recent posts from News Blog
Deal may turn HP into networking leader
CSC settles with feds over kickback allegations
Dell to cut XPS gaming desktops, embrace Alienware
For Hezbollah, it's fiber warfare
Apple to highlight iPhone platform development at WWDC
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 23 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Wow...
by gsmiller88 January 9, 2008 3:52 PM PST
As if it wasn't enough on YouTube, now AT&T is trying to do the same thing. I knew there was a reason I wasn't an AT&T customer!
Reply to this comment
There you go again!
by Pete Bardo January 9, 2008 3:59 PM PST
Just when we thought we were rid of AT&T... Anti-trust breakup. Trust reunited. Secret wire-taps. Illegal release of log files. Why wouldn't we trust AT&T to filter content?
Reply to this comment
Go right ahead...
by Penguinisto January 9, 2008 4:30 PM PST
...and the very first time an AT&T customer pirating music, the litigating RIAA record corp should be forced to name AT&T as a co-defendant. ...and the very first time an AT&T customer gets caught downloading child porn onto his machine, AT&T's entire board needs to sit in the docket right next to the pedophile. ...the next spam anyone gets from a compromised AT&T customer's computer? Well, we can now report AT&T as a violator of the CAN-SPAM act. If you're going to filter based on content, then you are at that point responsible for all content that travels to and from your customer base, whether you manage to catch it all or not. And no, no more safe harbor provision of the DMCA either, big guy... you decided to take responsibility for the content the moment you started filtering your customers based on content. /P
Reply to this comment View reply
We've seen what happens
by unknown unknown January 9, 2008 5:07 PM PST
When Canadian ISP's started blocking and throttling bittorrent, developers quickly came up with a protocol encryption scheme that made it a little more difficult. I suspect if content filtering becomes common we'll see encryption there as well.
Reply to this comment
Sure they will
by thomas.terrrainnova.org January 9, 2008 6:17 PM PST
No need to worry, as it can not be done. Theoretically they can, but practically filtering network content on the fly is near-impossible. It requires a huge infrastructure to cope with the enormous amound of data, and even if AT&T is prepared to spend the money (and I'm quite sure they're not) how can you identify what's pirated and what's not? How can you tell the difference between a legal and a pirated MP3?
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Very good points.
by ralfthedog January 9, 2008 7:05 PM PST
Penguinisto is correct in that this will open up a great legal issue. Unknown is correct that even simple encryption will make this useless. and Thomas is correct in that this will create a large performance hit on the ATT network. I see many negatives but no gains. This is just a bit of smoke to make the RIAA happy. It will never happen.
Reply to this comment
To humor the idea that this is even possible...
by Michael Bird January 9, 2008 7:34 PM PST
As competitive as the broadband market has become, does AT&T really think they're doing themselves any favors ingratiating themselves to the entertainment industry at the expense of their customer base? I can see their rationale, given that the entertainment industry has been playing top to the technically naive Congress's bottom. But as the old "system of pipes" dogs die and retire off, this is going to change, which is to say nothing of the fact that a corporation-run government over the next four years is unlikely to say the least. The only certainty is that the second someone thinking they are enjoying a level of privacy gets red-flagged and denied service, the word is going to spread quickly and customers will jump from AT&T in mass exodus.
Reply to this comment View reply
ISP filtering is the wave of the future
by David_Burt January 9, 2008 9:28 PM PST
It's happening in Australia and Japan now for porn, in the UK for child porn. It will happen here too. Lots more on my blog all about filtering at www.filteringfacts.org --David Burt
Reply to this comment
SSL - HTTPS, SFTP, ...
by JadedGamer January 10, 2008 4:40 AM PST
"What? No, you don't get to see what I transfer on my secure connection. Yes, it's strange that I suddenly started using SSL for everything, and it's sad that your "filter" cannot see what I do. But them's the breaks."
Reply to this comment
The beginning of the end of the Internet
by directorblue January 10, 2008 4:54 AM PST
Whatever AT&T is intending to do, it ain't TCP/IP. http://www.savetheinternet.com/
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On GameSpot: Download game demos, patches, and more!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: