January 11, 2008 6:52 AM PST

Homeland Security to press ahead with Real ID

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Friday plans to take the next step in getting its controversial Real ID plan off the ground, despite opposition from numerous states and privacy groups.

At a midday press conference in Washington, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is scheduled to take the wraps off final regulations for the electronic identification card mandate and to make another pitch for the scheme's perceived importance in keeping Americans safe from terrorist threats.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff

(Credit: U.S. Department of Homeland Security)

The new rules, which are a few months behind schedule, are supposed to build on a draft version released last March for public comment.

Chertoff himself has been mum on the details ahead of his public appearance Friday. But according to anonymous sources cited by the Associated Press and The Washington Post, the department has made at least one significant change to its earlier plans: pushing back the deadlines by which the new identification cards will be required to board airplanes and enter federal buildings.

Before, Homeland Security had envisioned requiring the IDs to be in place, starting May 11, 2008--and no later than 2013--unless states had applied for an extension.

But under the new rules, Americans won't be expected to present Real ID-compliant identification cards until 2014. Even then, the mandate will apply only to Americans younger than 50 at the time, in an apparent effort to give some disgruntled state motor vehicle departments more time to issue the licenses. The requirements would be broadened to all Americans by 2017.

"We've worked very closely with the states, in terms of developing a plan that I think will be quite inexpensive, reasonable to implement, and produce the results that...are a part of the core recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, which is secure identification when driver's licenses are presented," Chertoff said Thursday, according to a transcript of his remarks, at a meeting of departmental advisers.

Largely because of the price tag, 17 states have already enacted legislation rejecting the Real ID requirements, which Congress passed as part of an emergency spending bill in 2005, and several others were considering such a step, according to the American Civil Liberties Union, one of the most prominent voices against the plan. But according to the AP and the Post, federal officials have somehow devised a way to reduce the expected $14 billion in costs to states to $3.9 billion under the revised rules.

It's unclear how the department plans to assuage security and privacy concerns about the cards, including whether data encoded on their two-dimensional bar codes will be encrypted to guard against misuse. The AP reported that states will have a "menu" of security options from which to choose but will not be required to embed "microchips"--ostensibly a reference to radio frequency identification, or RFID, technology, which, depending on the type, could be read either from a distance or close-up.

Update: Click here to read our follow-up story, featuring Secretary Chertoff's remarks about the final rules and reactions from state officials, privacy groups, and members of Congress.

Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia CEO denies buyout of Via
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Facebook borrows $100 million
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 86 comments (Page 1 of 5)
Gestapo
by crosstiewalkin January 11, 2008 7:11 AM PST
All of this news about homeland security and Real ID conjures up World II images of the Gestapo, presenting your papers at crossarmed checkpoints, and inevitably Cheech and Chong's latter-day voice on interrogation: "Ve haf vays of making you talk."
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Interesting
by Renegade Knight January 11, 2008 7:25 AM PST
Most people don't want it. Most states don't want it. The odds of it doing any good in the prevention department are about zero. What's the purpose? This department should walk into the next presidents office and offer to disband itself.
Reply to this comment
keeping Americans safe from terrorist threats
by rcrusoe January 11, 2008 7:29 AM PST
Want us to believe you are interested in keeping us safe? CLOSE THE F***ING BORDER! Until you lock the door everything else is just a dog & pony show for the gullible.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Will actually make the country insecure
by likes2comment January 11, 2008 7:59 AM PST
Since everyone will have the same type of id, cloning them, hacking the databases will then be a group effort since there will be one target to hack. And once they have been hacked, how do you fix the problem of identity theft? My Ohio id's mag strip was accidentally erased by my 'earth magnet'. Doesn't bother me, but people that demand to swipe my license thru a reader generally give up after a couple of attempts.
Reply to this comment View reply
Nothing Doing
by SuburbanDad January 11, 2008 8:09 AM PST
Why not tattoo a bar code on our foreheads? I want nothing to do with a National ID card. For that matter, "Homeland Security" sounds like a Nazi-Nanny-State idea. The FBI et al worked perfectly fine before 9/11/01, but Bush43 ignored warning after warning. How about dissolving the Federal government and returning power to the states instead of giving the Feds even more power?
Reply to this comment
How can this be a good idea?
by C0git0 January 11, 2008 8:36 AM PST
Conspiracy theories aside, the purpose of us as Americans is to elect leaders that will protect us, not put us in harms way. Having an ID card similar to the one proposed by Homeland Security opens the door to an infinite number of threats from political abuse, identity theft to market research. There isn't ANY reason why our government needs to know where and when I travel. Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety - Benjamin Franklin
Reply to this comment
REAL ID is not about the ID
by allen b January 11, 2008 8:37 AM PST
It seems like previous posters don't understand what REAL ID is. It is not a National Identification Card. It is a National Standard for being able to get an Identification Card. The ID must meet certain minimum security specifications, but most states have already implemented those into their current ID's. The biggest cost to the states will be creating a system that will prove you are who you say you are. Currently there are some states where you can go and get a phot ID by bringing in a Social Security card, and 2 pieces of mail addressed to you. I don't think I need to explain how easy this is to get around. Since the government agencies use your photo ID to determine who you are, if you can easily get one under someone else's name, you can be anyone you want. That is the reason for REAL ID.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Real ID, Real Scary
by Schratboy January 11, 2008 8:38 AM PST
Knock, Knock! "Who's there?" Big Brother! What better way for the global elite to control us? They don't even have to lift a finger and they've got a means of tracking us and obtaining everything they want to know...with a swipe. It's the first step towards implanting everyone with a chip to track and tax us til death.
Reply to this comment
How About Securing Borders First?
by BSRadar January 11, 2008 8:44 AM PST
More BS. Homeland Security is a big joke. There was an article where one of their high up staff members was hired with a fake diploma! Yeah real secure! How about securing all the other holes like borders and national defense, then maybe you wouldnt have to require REAL ID. Cant the American people see the game that being played on them? Lets wait for next "attack" and then Prez will declare martial law with UN Toops enforcing it (as in American hungry Russian and Chinese soldiers) because hes sending all of ours off to Iran making sure all thats left are senior citizens.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Social Security #s were not to be used as ID
by lonecrone January 11, 2008 9:03 AM PST
Does anyone remember that? In fact, I remember that being printed on my first SS card back in 1965. It was only to be used by the Social Security Administration to keep track of your benefits. Now, just try to do anything without giving your SS number. They can say all they want about how it's not really a national ID,and that we won't be expected to present it on demand, but anybody with a memory knows different. I'm having visions of Nazi Germany and Stalinist USSR.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
Click Here
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: