March 14, 2008 11:24 AM PDT

Trent Reznor: Radiohead's 'In Rainbows' promotion was 'insincere'

Nine Inch Nails' Ghosts I-IV has so far earned $1.6 million.

(Credit: NIN.com)

Radiohead's groundbreaking promotion for the album In Rainbows was "insincere" and smacked of a "bait and switch," according to Trent Reznor, leader of the group Nine Inch Nails.

Reznor made the comments during an interview with the Australia Broadcasting Corporation earlier this week.

"I think the way [Radiohead] parlayed it into a marketing gimmick has certainly been shrewd," Reznor said. "But if you look at what they did, it was very much a bait and switch, to get you to pay for a MySpace quality stream as a way to promote a very traditional record sale."

The In Rainbows promotion was distributed online, without backing from a major record company and allowed fans to pay whatever they thought the digital album was worth. Radiohead was widely praised for breaking from the label system.

But Radiohead's manager has also said that the band likely wouldn't try a similar promotion again. The British super group ended the offer and has begun selling the record through traditional sales channels.

"I don't see that as a big revolution [that] they're kind of getting credit for," Reznor told the Australia Broadcasting Corporation on Monday. "There's nothing wrong with that, but I don't see that as a big revolution [that] they're kind of getting credit for...to me that feels insincere. It relies upon the fact that it was quote-unquote 'first,' and it takes the headlines with it."

Reznor has a point. There's no arguing that Radiohead's music giveaway pioneered new territory, but when it comes to actually plowing ahead with a determined search for a new way to distribute music, Radiohead falls short.

The truth is that Reznor, who at times is volatile--and is always outspoken--is doing more for music fans and fellow musicians than anybody.

Earlier this month, Nine Inch Nails began distributing a digital album, Ghosts I-IV a 36-track instrumental, in a range of ways. The offer included free samples, a $5 digital version and premium packages that came with downloads, discs, and varying merchandise depending on the money one was willing to pay. In a little over a week, Reznor told The Chicago Tribune that he generated 781,917 transactions and earned $1.6 million.

Radiohead may have earned more and likely gathered information valuable to other artists who might be considering self-distribution. We don't know because, unlike Reznor, the band isn't sharing sales numbers.

What is so sad about these promotions by Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead is that, other than Reznor, few artists are tinkering with the Internet or looking for an alternative to the traditional business model in the music industry.

We're talking about rock 'n' roll here. It was once rumored to be the domain of rebels and rogues. How come more performers aren't bucking the status quo?

Recent posts from News Blog
Nvidia CEO denies buyout of Via
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Facebook borrows $100 million
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 24 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Not Quite
by saks March 14, 2008 11:43 AM PDT
The difference between Trent Reznor and Radiohead is that Radiohead is still a marketable brand putting out great music, and Reznor is a has-been who's scrambling to do anything that will put money in his pocket. Radiohead's free distribution was "revolutionary" because everyone knows they would have made crazy money out of a conventional release, but they took an alternate route and surprised and impressed a lot of industry-watchers and fans alike.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Why does he care?
by MikeG8r March 14, 2008 1:21 PM PDT
There's no reason for Trent Reznor to dump all over Radiohead like that. They tried the model, it didn't work for them, so they abandoned it. Why does he care what Radiohead does anyway?
Reply to this comment
Rock N Roll?
by dannyzen March 14, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
We're talking about rock 'n' roll here --No. We're not. This is a major point all the writers are missing. We're talking about experimental music, experimental fans, and experimental methods of distributing. The model is not only being changed, but the music that it is supporting. This isn't mainstream Mmmbop. This is synthesizers and drum machines.
Reply to this comment
Easy to understand
by ewelch March 14, 2008 5:51 PM PDT
Most musicians don't have the depth of understanding of their fans or the Internet that Trent Reznor has. I'm not a really big fan of most of his music, though some I find quite compelling. I shelled out the $5 to see what it was like, and I really like it. And I found it a better deal at five bucks than Radiohead's stuff at free. Ghosts is very high quality. And there are Apple's iTunes lossless and even bigger alternatives. Gotta give credit where credit is due. Reznor is really a pioneer here. Most musicians can't get that because they've been so dependent on the middle man that they don't dare break from the labels. For one, they're mostly creations of marketing. Not really self-made musicians.
Reply to this comment
Interesting album and
by baconstang March 14, 2008 7:27 PM PDT
the various formats are brilliant and comprehensive. Not sure why he felt the need to dump on Radiohead though.....
Reply to this comment
Trent Reznor is king of insincerity
by postrealitysyndrome March 14, 2008 8:16 PM PDT
Is Reznor dissing Radiohead because they come up with a genuinely beautiful album that he just, creatively, cannot compete with, and is therefore lashing out at the business side of it? 1st of all, my girlfriend downloaded "In Rainbows," one of the most amazing albums since, I don't know, maybe RH's previous album- and paid what she wanted- $5- can't beat that for some amazing music. 2nd of all, RH posts a 52-minute movie of the new album on youtube, viewable for free. Amazing. Reznor is nit-picking about what they could have done, blah, blah...Sure he can speak his mind, but his time would be better spent toning down his melodrama. He's one of the most over- rated artists of his age. Pretty Hate Machine was good- even saw him live for that tour- but his phony angst, continuing to this day, has grown tiresome. Trent, grow up already. How does your approach offer anything better? Put your energy into opening up YOUR creative sincerity, ok?
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
You can listen Ghosts online too - on ghosts.nin.com
by krosavcheg March 14, 2008 10:33 PM PDT
Thinking about buying it.
Reply to this comment
Who would have paid?
by parabyte March 16, 2008 7:29 AM PDT
It's a good thing NIN gave away Ghosts I, because I can't imagine anyone paying for it. As for the comments on the quality of the "In Rainbows" download, I challenge anyone to tell the difference between a song encoded at 160Kbps (In rainbows download) vs 192Kbps (standard CD quality). Give me a break...if you want superior quality, buy the vinyl.
Reply to this comment View reply
Why indeed so many music pussies?
by johnalphonse March 16, 2008 8:01 AM PDT
Totally agree with the author of this blog post: we have become a nation of complicit drones even among the youth and music-minded. Try to get people to do something different and innovative and they scoff at it and go back to folding their laundry.
Reply to this comment
Why indeed so many music wusses?
by johnalphonse March 16, 2008 8:02 AM PDT
Totally agree with the author of this blog post: we have become a nation of complicit drones even among the youth and music-minded. Try to get people to do something different and innovative and they scoff at it and go back to folding their laundry.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On MP3.com: Worst MP3 Players of 2007
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: