March 27, 2008 7:17 AM PDT

Happily ever after for Comcast and BitTorrent?

Update 7:57 AM PDT: Comcast and BitTorrent have made it official, announcing that they are working together "and with the broader Internet and ISP community" to address issues of rich media and network management. One specific result of the talks: Comcast says that, by the end of 2008, it will have adopted a "capacity management technique that is protocol agnostic."

Are Comcast and BitTorrent secretly an old married couple, prone to bickering over their peccadilloes and never quite comfortable together in public, but still joined tightly by an abiding sense of union and shared purpose?

So it would seem. The Wall Street Journal on Thursday reports a deal in the works between the cable provider and the file-sharing company that would have the pair collaborating on ways to make their technologies more compatible. Comcast, of course, has been on the hot seat in recent weeks over its practice of stymieing the peer-to-peer traffic of BitTorrent users.

Top executives at the two companies told the newspaper that Comcast will look for better ways to manage peak traffic on its network, slowing things down for those users who consume the most bandwidth, rather than by types of applications, such as BitTorrent. The new policy, which would also factor in additional data capacity, could take effect by the end of the year--if lab tests show it to be feasible.

The talks are also aimed at helping Comcast shore up video traffic on its network.

Public disputes aside, collaboration between the companies is nothing new, as CNET News.com's Marguerite Reardon reported recently. Her Q&A earlier this month with BitTorrent CEO Doug Walker, "BitTorrent to Comcast: Let's be friends," offers a wealth of detail and insight about the relationship, Comcast's issues with Internet video, and potential solutions.

"We have reached out to them. Actually, Tony Werner, who is the CTO of Comcast, is an adviser to BitTorrent," Walker told News.com. "And very few people know that."

Walker goes on: "We are continuing to have a dialogue. I am hopeful that we are going to be able to work together in the future as this whole thing works itself out and takes its natural course. If there is anyway we can help Comcast make its network more efficient, we'd like to be a part of that solution."

And that's in spite of the fact that the Q&A starts out with Walker saying that Comcast had unfairly singled out BitTorrent.

Recent posts from News Blog
Facebook CTO to leave company
Nvidia CEO denies buyout of Via
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Facebook borrows $100 million
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 11 comments (Page 1 of 1)
What happend to the FCC ruling?
by Leland2008 March 27, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
I don't think it matters if Comcast and Bittorrent are helping each other now. FCC still has to resolve the issue about future issues like the current one for other ISP's to know that they are not playing Police on the NET.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
talks of fixing TCP protocol
by smarty_pantz March 27, 2008 9:15 AM PDT
I was reading George Ou's article. "Fixing the unfairness of TCP congestion control" (http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=1078) In a nutshell, it discusses a protocol from the Bittorrent guys that would allow the 'heavy' load of P2P to be polite and step out of the way when a "mom & pop" websurfer requests a page, and then to step back in when that page has been transferred to mom & pop. The theory is that this would: 1) not affect the download times of long running p2p apps 2) allow the non-p2p people to have fast response times and enjoyable surfing 3) be protocol agnostic 4) remove ISPs from the evils of playing god 5) allow a win-win situation for both casual surfers and p2p users What's the incentive for p2p users to change protocols you say? 1) ISPs would probably allow 'unregulated' surfing with this new "polite" protocol 2) I believe most p2p users are polite and don't mind stepping out of the way for a few seconds if mom & pop want to grab a webpage, AS LONG AS they can have their p2p connections unregulated (which is the suggestion)...so win-win. If you've never read anything about p2p before, read this one; it's the most interesting suggestion I've heard in 5 years. Cheers
Reply to this comment View reply
Traffic Hogs
by mikalg March 27, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
This is actually quite funny to me. Comcast singles out bittorrent users/traffic because they find users use a great deal of bandwidth. Comcast then gets into trouble because shaping traffic by protocol ie: torrents may be unfair to that particular customer base. If, in fact, torrent users on Comcast's network use a vast amount of bandwidth....is the "new" policy any better? Do we not have the same problem/solution in shaping without actually naming the beast? If some California oranges from XYZ co. (largest grower in CA.) were found to be infected with the ecoli virus...and the solution was to limit or ban the shipping of these oranges.. which plan would you consider: A. California oranges from XYZ inc. are to be blocked from shipment. (Actual NAME and product) B.All orange, round, citrus produce is to be banned from shipping from the largest orange grower in California. C. All of the above...results are the same.
Reply to this comment
Still Trouble
by Public Knowledge March 28, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
Whatever this deal means, it does not mean that Comcast is out of the throttling business. We at Public Knowledge are still pushing forward with our petition to the FCC to demand that Comcast abide by the FCC principles of network management. More information about our petition can be found at: http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1485
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: