Google goes dark for Earth Hour


Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.
Add this feed to your online news reader
August 30, 2008 7:00 AM PDT
August 29, 2008 10:53 PM PDT
August 29, 2008 5:19 PM PDT
Underexposed
Adobe gets an e-earful, and listensDear Adobe, a site where customers of the company's products can carp about problems and pass judgment on others' gripes, has caught Adobe's attention.
Gallery
Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week
News - Apple
Tethering coming soon to iPhone 3G?If the latest e-mail claiming to be the work of Apple's CEO is accurate, iPhone 3G owners might soon be able to get their laptops online using their phone.
Outside the Lines
EIC Squared: Psystar vs. Apple, Cisco vs. Microsoft, Dell's cloudOn this episode of the EIC Squared podcast, CNET News' Dan Farber and ZDNet's Larry Dignan discuss the week's news.
Video
USB device spies on mobile phones
News - Wireless
Europe reduces cap on voice-roaming pricesPrice reductions are due to EU regulation that aims to "curb the excessive roaming charges consumers had to pay for roaming calls."
Video
Up close with one-to-one computing
News - Politics and Law
How to get thrown into a Chinese prisonJames Powderly planned to use a green laser to project a pro-Tibet message on the Bird's Nest Stadium during the Olympics. Before he could make the attempt, Chinese authorities locked him up for nearly a week.
News - Cutting Edge
Art design for the masses, chosen by the massesIndustry execs say crowdsourcing is one of the best ways to stay on top of consumer trends, so a host of new sites are asking professional and armchair designers to submit art for sneakers, skateboards, car art, and stationery.
Gallery
Photos: Your ticket to the Democratic convention
Crave
This week in Crave-landA look back at some of the truly interesting, strange, and wonderfully silly stories we Craved.
News - Politics and Law
Democrats find 'green' political convention tough to enforceThe idea of the "greenest" convention in the party's history was an attractive one. But tens of thousands of humans generate a lot of trash. And not everyone wanted to give up their Yukon XL SUVs.
Cheers, Papy
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=fact-or-fiction-black-is
a tad more impressive if they had turned off the ad revenue for
an hour.
What remained brightly lit is Google's hypocrisy.
A site which has been offering this kinda search for a while is www.searchincolor.com. There's actually a green background, lol...
-SG
Gores, oh my!
Sounds a lot like Commies and Fascists and Hitlers, too, if this
were only a couple decades ago...
We should definitely leave our lights on so that these awful
people don't use those fear tactics on us while we're at home in
the dark. I can just imagine an environmentalist lurking outside
my window.
Seriously, though, what harm can you do by saving a little
energy here and there? Don't want thieves breaking in to your
house, maybe you can leave one light on and still feel ok. Or
maybe you could make a more long-term investment by
switching to florescent bulbs or something.
Really, the point here isn't to scare you or to subvert you into
one of those dirty, scary hippies, it's so save some resources at a
time when many people are unsure about the longevity of said
resources.
I don't understand the resistance to something like this. Who
are you hurting by lowering your electricity bill and possibly
(depending on what you're so inclined to believe about the
environment) helping the world out? Even if you don't subscribe
to the notion of climate change, surely you can understand the
idea that energy costs money, so energy efficiency and diversity
are beneficial.
Right now it says "536,062.571 Watt hours saved".
They might have had more participation if they'd advertised it a little more. The first I heard about it was a few minutes ago (the hour ended 1.5 hours ago as I write this) when I read this article.
interested in paying $500 and then complaining when someone
brings up the notion that I should use less, even if they don't.
I commend you for using more efficient florescent bulbs, and as
you point out, we know nothing about who you are or where you
live, but come on, your comment was strictly name-calling and
anger-based. I understand your concern about corporations like
Google being, at times, hypocritical, but that neither excuses
anyone from a responsibility to be concerned about their effects
on those around them, nor does it justify your contempt for
certain politicians and social groups. If anything, I would say
your point about Google serves to illustrate the refusal of certain
other politicians and interest groups to jump on the bandwagon
of environmentalism when it suits their own interests... just like
major corporations tend to do. you're on to something that I
agree with, I just don't think you've made the connection to
yourself or your politics. I'm curious if you have a measured
response to this, or if this is going to be a debate from two
decidedly high horses.
Glo goolge!
-im trlying to baand-eid mly knee, blut I htink i jjust bannd-aidd hte cat.
- stupid
-
by kakodes_too
March 31, 2008 7:28 AM PDT
- Stupid
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
See all 59 Comments >>