April 24, 2008 8:00 AM PDT

Study: Teens say e-text isn't writing

Nearly every teen uses instant chat, text messaging, or some sort of online social network to keep in touch with friends. But ask a wired teen whether e-mail and other types of electronic communication can be considered the act of "writing," and the answer is likely "no."

A new study released Thursday from the Pew Internet & American Life Project and the National Commission on Writing showed that the majority of U.S. teens, or 60 percent of those surveyed, do not view electronic texts as writing.

Despite that, at least 64 percent of kids age 12 to 17 admit that they incorporate, often accidentally, some informal writing styles from digital communication (e.g., emoticons, "LOL" acronyms, and bad punctuation) into their writing for school.

Apart from their under-classification of digital text, 86 percent of teens consider good writing skills essential to their future success. That's backed up by what their parents believe, too. Eight in 10 parents think that good writing skills are more important now than they were 20 years ago.

All teens write at least some for school, but 93 percent of kids surveyed said that they write for themselves outside of school.

"There is clearly a big gap in the minds of teenagers between the 'real' writing they do for school and the texts they compose for their friends," Amanda Lenhart, co-author of the Pew report, said in a statement. "Yet, it is also clear that writing holds a central place in the lives of teens and in their vision about the skills they need for the future."

Other findings from the study:

--57 percent of teens say they revise and edit more when they write using a computer.

--63 percent of teens say using computers to write makes no difference in the quality of the writing they produce.

To compile its data, Pew interviewed 700 kids by phone last fall, and conducted several focus groups in various U.S. cities last summer. The survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points.

Recent posts from News Blog
YouTube ads for viral videos: 'buzz targeting'
EA tops expectations, looks ahead
Hackers going after restaurants, supermarkets
GIS exec works to unlock hidden geo data
New Office 2007 add-on makes commands easier to find
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 15 comments (Page 1 of 1)
There is something literarily unsettling about this sentence.
by bt1980 April 24, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
"All teens write at least some for school, but 93 percent of kids surveyed said that they write for themselves outside of school." Me fail Inglush? That's unpossible!
Reply to this comment View reply
eText?
by dizzigital April 24, 2008 10:12 AM PDT
So in summary, eText appearing in online information text exchange which also expands into eBooks, articles, and e-mails (which consist of newsletters eCourses and the like) have no relevance, emotion, experience, information, and other positive relevance to their readers? Or are you referring to simply the micro brief hi bye laugh ha really no way ok bye late text messages and other brief IM's. Broad statement. Wrong, thanks for playing. Robert
Reply to this comment View reply
heartening
by sdencar April 25, 2008 8:22 AM PDT
This story is actually heartening for me. My kids (step-kids) didn't have all the latest text devices. But they are gone now, so I am not in touch with kids who have all the latest gadgets. I was beginning to think that kids made no differentiation between "real" writing, complete with good punctuation and spelling, and goofball internet acronyms. This story suggests that kids DO know the difference. As long as parents and teachers know the difference, and impart that knowledge, we'll do just fine!
Reply to this comment
Good or Bad??
by bigmc6000 April 25, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
So I'm trying to figure out the goal in this stat "63 percent of teens say using computers to write makes no difference in the quality of the writing they produce." So does that man 63% think their writing is better or just equivalent to long hand? Personally I've always been a much better writer sitting at a computer than writing long hand because ideas flow quicker since I type much faster than I could write...
Reply to this comment View reply
Whats the point of this study?
by Composer_1777 April 25, 2008 3:41 PM PDT
Usually a large study like this has some sort of goal. As far as i can tell it's just B.S. some marketing researcher came up with, out of boredom. WOW... E-texting isn't writting, really i could have read a dictionary and told you that. Pointless research and waste of money, good job Marketers, you broke the first rule of research. LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL It's like asking teens is jogging the same as running... Of course not!
Reply to this comment
Teens and texting
by lrosen9999 April 26, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
Thanks for your interesting article on texting and kids. You might be interested in our recent research in this area. My colleagues and I have been studying the impact of "textisms" on writing. In a study completed in late 2007, we asked a sample of 678 pre-teens, teens, and young adults to tell us how much they use certain textisms in their daily written ?online communication? and then asked them to write a formal letter to a fictitious company. We then used a standard scoring rubric used to assess writing quality (and did not deduct points for using textisms in their letter unless it affected the rated quality) and found some staggering results: 1. The use of ?contextual textisms? such as smilies, using special characters to indicate feelings (e.g., *hugs*), or using all capital letters to suggest strong emotions WERE NOT RELATED TO THE QUALITY OF THEIR FORMAL LETTER. 2. HOWEVER, the use of ?language-based textisms? such as acronyms (LOL), shortened words (tht instead of that), and removing apostrophes (wont instead of won?t) WERE NEGATIVELY RELATED TO THE QUALITY OF THEIR WRITING. In particular, those who used more of those textisms produced worse writing samples than those who your fewer even after partially out gender and age! We had hoped that this was not going to be the case (there is some scant data from England suggesting the opposite) and are now exploring it further with a larger sample of subjects and two writing samples ? a formal one and an informal one ? in the hopes of gaining more clarity on the impact of textisms in online communication on writing in the classroom. For more information on our work please visit www.Me-MySpace-and-I.com. Dr. Larry Rosen LROSEN@CSUDH.EDU
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Latest from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
On CHOW: Does drinking ice water burn calories?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: