April 24, 2008 1:35 PM PDT

Are wired kids well served by schools?

PALO ALTO, Calif.--Among the generation of kids growing up wired, many teens are hyper-motivated to learn a special skill like how to create a podcast, direct a YouTube video, publish an anime site, or hack an iPhone.

Now if only teachers could inspire such ingenuity.

That was one of the basic questions that had academics scratching their heads here Wednesday at Stanford University, where a group of researchers from the University of Southern California and University of California at Berkeley presented their first findings from one of the largest ethnographic studies on kids in digital environments. (An enthnographic study draws on fieldwork to provide a descriptive picture of a group. The full research will be published later this year as part of a MacArthur Foundation grant.)

Sure, kids have long been attracted to extracurricular activities like dance or sports. But researchers say digital media is bringing up a new generation who are creators of media rather than just passive consumers of it. Within these digital environments among peers, kids who create and evaluate media are deriving a sense of competence, autonomy, self-determination and connectedness, researchers say.

"Kids associate one word with school--'boring,'" said Deborah Stipek, dean and professor of education at Stanford, who was part of a panel discussion with the group of researchers. But kids' levels of engagement with the Internet and games could give educators new ideas for upping school's status.

"The question becomes what is the role of school in this larger environment," Stipek said.

Are schools disconnected from real-world tech skills? Dale Dougherty, founding editor and publisher of Make and Craft magazines, said during the panel that his team asked an audience of programmers where they learned to write code. Only 15 percent said that they learned programming at school.

The Stanford event, which was sponsored by MacArthur and Common Sense Media, raised more questions than it answered. But one of the more interesting findings in the research showed that many kids are drawn to create media online because their work can be immediately recognized or judged among their peer group or a larger audience, according to Mimi Ito, a cultural anthropologist of technology use and a principal investigator on MacArthur's project. That, she said, can be immediately gratifying.

In contrast, it can take kids much longer to reap the rewards or build recognition from hard work in school.

"It's the context of publicity now (online) vs. delayed gratification of getting a job in 10 years," Ito said. "The assessment of what they do happens internal to their community (of peers). Kids get to be the evaluator as much as the producer in interest-driven groups. School is much more of a future trajectory."

"Schools are breeding these delayed-gratification animals," said Dilan Mahendran, a doctoral candidate in the School of Information at UC Berkeley, who worked on one study.

Part of this is happening because American families have shifted from a television culture in the living room to a bedroom culture, in which many kids have television or a computer in their room. Another reason is that teens go online to hang out with friends because they don't have a place to go offline, according to Danah Boyd, a doctoral candidate at the School of Information at UC Berkeley and one of the researchers.

The researchers' initial findings are part of a long-range effort by the MacArthur Foundation, which in 2006 promised to spend $50 million on research and programs surrounding kids, technology, and learning. The goal was to figure out whether young people are changing through the use of digital media and technology, and if so, how? What are the effects of this digital immersion on kids' communication styles, friendships, families, and so on.

Some of the results are already in. Studies like those from Pew already show that as many as 83 percent of all kids play video games, and 53 percent of kids create media online. The thought that a majority of kids online would have a home page a la MySpace would have been laughable just 10 years ago, Ito said.

As part of her fieldwork, Ito got to know an 18-year-old girl named Anesha, who has produced several animated music shorts for YouTube. Her work was first seen by only a handful of her peers, but now thousands of people have watched her videos on Youtube, much to Anesha's delight. Ito said that the teen wants to go into film directing or editing.

"We're not saying there's going to be a digital generation whose eyes will be square," said Ito, who has studied kids in a range of online environments. "We're experiencing what 'public participation' (among young people) means, but it doesn't mean everyone will get a fancy job."

Recent posts from News Blog
Motorola's strategy and technology chief quits
EA's acquisition bid for Take-Two expires
Firefox 3 release candidate goes public
Yahoo tries to conceal lawsuit documents
HP to launch fall line of teen PC products
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 8 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Skeptical
by tundraboy April 24, 2008 3:18 PM PDT
I'm a skeptic when it comes to 'wired' or 'tech-savvy' education. I find that access to media and all sorts of media creation tools tends to make the kids (and the teachers!) focus more on presentation than substance. A friend's kid did a multimedia report on WWII. Beautiful slide show with very compelling soundtrack and photographs about the London blitz. Totally devoid of any meaningful content at all. The kid thought that collecting photographs and artfully arranging them in an emotionally gripping manner made a great report. We are in danger of communicating the message that a very nice wrapper is an indicator of competence. We need to make sure kids learn how to process information not just gather them and present them in an attractive format. All these media creation tools are just a distraction.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Is it the schools responsibility?
by birdtford April 24, 2008 8:32 PM PDT
Is it really the schools responsibility to teach students how to use PC's or the internet. I feel they can help if that is what the student wants to learn. I beleive the schools/teachers should be educated enough with PC's and the internet to provide guidence as to what can help students with thier homework. Also, just because a student used media software to creat a clas project. I don't see where that means that they want to go into media as a career. I have used media software for presentations, but my career is not in media and I have no desire to make it my career.
Reply to this comment
Delayed grtification animals
by annewuj April 26, 2008 8:15 AM PDT
If only. I agree that this is a matter of balance. Yes, schools must do much more to use the tools that students find compelling. And certainly immediate feedback from not just the teacher but from peers is central. Good teachers jumped on wikis and blogs as tools that do just that -- allow for collabortaion, peer support and a larning community, while providing students with a real audience, both in the classroom and out. But all this needs to be balanced against the need to develop learners who are willing to do the hard work of truly internalizing knowledge and building on the work of those who went before to create the next generation of break-through ideas. And while external validation is important, so is the pleasure derived from a personal awareness of a "job well done."
Reply to this comment
Correction
by pglange April 28, 2008 10:11 PM PDT
As Dr. Ito mentioned in the meeting, the research quoted on YouTube came from Dr. Patricia G. Lange's study of video bloggers on YouTube. For more information on this research, please see: http://sfaapodcasts.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/update-apr- 17-lange-sfaa-paper-2007.pdf
Reply to this comment
Intersting assertions re: delayed gratification
by aldreds May 5, 2008 11:01 PM PDT
I'm not sure that I agree with the delayed gratification argument in this article. It seems to me that it is more about public acknowledgment in an authentic real world. A read the "Wrappers" comment with some interest and suggest that students are more likely to engage in higher order thinking when they put together a product based around complex real-world scenarios. Set a low level task with little real-world context and be prepared to receive a "pretty" and shallow product from some students.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip

  2. Photos: Cracking open the Atari 2600

  3. This VC forecast scares the pants off of me

  4. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  5. Photos: Jet-powered wing propels solo flight

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On MovieTome: Captain America in IRON MAN?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: