April 30, 2008 3:03 PM PDT

Schmidt says Google still scratching head over YouTube profits

Google CEO Eric Schmidt likely surprised few by confirming Wednesday that his company's video-sharing powerhouse YouTube isn't quite throwing off lots of cash.

It was obvious from Google's earnings reports that YouTube has yet to generate material income. Still, it's worth noting, 18 months after Google acquired YouTube for $1.65 billion, the company has acknowledged that it hasn't "figured out the perfect solution of how to make money."

"We're working but have not yet in my view gotten a breakthrough around monetization," Schmidt said during an interview for CNBC. "We're working on that. That's our highest priority this year."

Schmidt also indicated that the company is coming out with new modes of advertising.

"We believe the best products are coming out this year," Schmidt said. "They're new products. They're not announced. They're not just putting in-line ads in the things that people are trying...Google believes that advertising itself has value. The ads literally are valuable to consumers. Not just to the advertisers, but the consumers."

Google CEO Eric Schmidt

(Credit: Elinor Mills/CNET News.com)

In-line ads are the text ads you see around video players. Google has also experimented with overlay ads that pop up within the video player itself for a few seconds. I wrote last year that I didn't think the ads were too obtrusive. TV networks have used overlays for years to battle TiVo users skipping past commercials. Audiences are already used to them.

Plenty of people disagreed with my assessment of the overlay ads.

But I'm expecting Google to be more aggressive with advertising at YouTube this year. Right now the company is providing a free video-hosting service to hundreds of millions all over the world (more than 10 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube every minute).

Google and YouTube are paying what many believe are millions in bandwidth costs every year. They have every right to be compensated.

I also think the longer Google takes to get users accustomed to some form of advertising, the harder it will be.

Recent posts from News Blog
Firefox 3 release candidate goes public
Yahoo tries to conceal lawsuit documents
HP to launch fall line of teen PC products
Hooray! Yahoo Mail ditches tagline ads
Conde Nast buys Ars Technica
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 11 comments (Page 1 of 1)
If YouTube isn't making money by now...
by gsmiller88 April 30, 2008 4:03 PM PDT
Then unless they completely overhaul their advertising strategy, there's no hope.
Reply to this comment
"They have every right to be compensated"
by dhavleak April 30, 2008 4:16 PM PDT
For the amount of copyright violations on YouTube, the media companies must be thinking the same thing. Google has about as much "right to be compensated" as the artists whose stuff ends up there. Perhaps less. No business has a "right" to compensation. They either have successes, or failures, or something in between. Google search would be a success (a resounding one at that). YouTube has potential, but it's also a legal ticking time-bomb.
Reply to this comment View reply
$5 bucks a month? I would pay it right now!
by onlyauser April 30, 2008 4:57 PM PDT
YouTube is great and IMHO it's value could easily command a subscription fee structure.
Reply to this comment View reply
YouTube audience not interested in Ads
by Rusty Digital Marketing April 30, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
I think Google's pushing it up hill on this one. Ever tried advertising on YouTube? I have run campaigns which include YouTube and the results are incredibly disappointing. People go to YouTube to see the latest dancing-dog video, or some politician having a "miss-spoke" moment. The content is all they look at - adverts on the site get very little click-through. It simply is not an environment which people go to seeking information! Digital Marketing Blog
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Watch Ad for Higher Quality
by xcgeek April 30, 2008 8:17 PM PDT
I'd put up with a short ad spot before certain videos if I could get a higher quality version. No Ad = low quality, Ad = High Quality. People go to YouTube to be entertained, they are passive content consumers and so in this situation the only ads that people pay attention to are something they cannot ignore - ie ad spots before the video.
Reply to this comment
Youtube limits user innovation...
by mattumanu May 1, 2008 4:39 AM PDT
I can tell you how youtube and google has failed. There should already be feature length and 1 hour user generated content available on youtube, but the right now the longest you video you can make is 10 minutes. By allowing outside pressures to dictate what they can and cannot allow, youtube has doomed itself to failure. Right now, google wants to monetize ten minute videos. This isn't going to cut it. I made a number of videos for youtube, but in almost every case I found myself unhappy with the ten minute limit. Sure I can splip longer content up into parts, but what I found is that even if you link the first part to the second part, the number of views for the second part nearly always lower than the first. With Vimeo, on the the other hand, I can release longer format content with better quality. And what's more, I can instantly monetize the content by selling passwords to protected content I uploaded, among other things. Either way, youtube is waste. With each change they make it becomes less appealing.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  2. Photos: Cracking open the Atari 2600

  3. This VC forecast scares the pants off of me

  4. End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip

  5. The Internet thrives on dark energy

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On BNET: IE users envy Firefox no more
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: