• On MovieTome: See the TRAILER for TERMINATOR 4!
May 20, 2008 11:03 AM PDT

A new Apple rumor, and the reason we're writing about it

Posted by Jim Kerstetter
  • Print

Executives must dream of the free publicity Apple's Steve Jobs enjoys when his fandom is anticipating a new product.

Gizmodo is reporting Tuesday that someone "very, very close" to the 3G iPhone launch has confirmed that Apple will unveil the new iPhone during the June 9 keynote address at Apple's Worldwide Developer Conference at San Francisco's Moscone Center. The phone should be available right after the keynote, Gizmodo reports. This is pretty much what an analyst report released last week from from Piper Jaffray said was going to happen.

Have you read anything about this gizmo?

As you can tell by this page on Google News, the 3G iPhone is easily the most hotly anticipated way to spend disposable income on a gadget since the original iPhone was released last summer.

Reporters, of course, love to grouse about product rumors, even as we dutifully write about them. (Far be it for us to deny the public the rumor du jour!) But we do it for a reason beyond the obvious page view benefits of intense Apple coverage: It's interesting.

In an era of me-too Web applications and shelves full of PCs and cell phones barely distinguishable from one another, Apple still manages to do something different. Love them or hate them, they're innovators.

As my colleague Tom Krazit wrote last summer on the morning of the iPhone launch: "There's an intense interest in anything related to Apple among the technology community. Whether people come to praise it or damn it, Apple evokes a passion rarely found in other sectors of the business world...Apple had to be taken seriously because of how the iPod changed the way people listened to music. The company earned that sort of credibility the old-fashioned way; it wasn't bestowed on them by a fawning press or rabid fanboys (for the most part)."

A year later, what Tom wrote is more true than ever. Yes, Apple gets lots of free publicity. In fact, Harvard Business School professor David Yoffie estimated last year that the iPhone generated $400 million in free publicity for Apple. A little embarrassing for those of us in the news business? Sure. But as reporters covering the technology industry, we're as curious as you about what Jobs has up his sleeve.

So we'll stop writing about it when you stop reading about it and Apple stops producing interesting stuff--none of which anyone expects to happen anytime soon.

Jim Kerstetter has been writing about the high-tech industry for more than 13 years, as a senior editor at PC Week, a Silicon Valley correspondent at BusinessWeek, and now an executive editor at CNET News. He moved back to Boston because he missed the Red Sox. E-mail Jim.
Recent posts from News Blog
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 34 comments
by nbvail May 20, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
A little embarrassing for those of us in the news business? What's wrong? It was a profound product and should be reporter, and as to other companies just design, build and sell great products and you too will get a lot of free press. Most US companies build crap and think we should just buy it and live with the horrors of their poorly conceived products.
Reply to this comment
by shetaan819 May 20, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
Does that mean I should take the day off right now for Monday, June 9th, ;) ? I cant imagine the productivity loss that will be recorded as scores of workers run out of the office to go stand in line at the AT&T store to get their iPhone at lunch time.....:0
Reply to this comment
by pgodfrey May 22, 2008 7:10 PM PDT
I'll fire you if you take the day off to get an iPhone. YOU'LL NEVER WORK IN THIS TOWN AGAIN! :)
by jksturg May 20, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
3G? Did I miss 2G? Hasn't there only been 1G of the iPhone so far?
Reply to this comment
by joythemechanicalboy May 20, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
we're talking about the 3g wireless data chipset which the new iphone will include, not the "3rd gen" iphone.
by FellowConspirator May 20, 2008 12:12 PM PDT
3G = 3rd generation mobile, not 3rd generation iPhone. 3G mobile operates at 384-2000 kbps whereas EDGE (what iPhone uses now, where available) basically operates at 1/2 that (in truth, EDGE is a subset of the 3G spec from ITU). 3G is common in Europe and very much less so in the USA.

I bet what most slowed down the 2G to 3G move in the US is the need for new licenses for the UMTS technology -- that and the general perception that building out the network isn't going to get people to buy more data service.
by geek. May 20, 2008 12:15 PM PDT
You're thinking of 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Generation in the life cycle of products.

The article (and all the buzz) is talking about 3G as it pertains to the Generation of wireless technology. iPhone Ver 1.0 = 2.5G (GSM/EDGE), Ver 2.0 = 3G (UMTS/HSPA).
by saintseminole May 20, 2008 12:10 PM PDT
Isn't it about time they dropped the letters "phone" from the names of these products? In common English usage, a "phone" is a device that can make and receive audio calls. Sure, the iPhone does that, but making calls doesn't seem to be its primary purpose.

Personally, I'm ready for the day when a company can make a phone that's just.... a phone.
Reply to this comment
by thedreaming May 20, 2008 12:50 PM PDT
There's a phone called "The Jitterbug" that's basically just a phone with a large display and big buttons. It's target audience are senior citizens and anyone that just wants a simple phone.
by groink_hi May 20, 2008 1:54 PM PDT
Yeah right. And before you know it, you'll have a 50-pound belt packed with gadgets that look similar to Bookman from Good Times. Packing different gadgets into a single package is the future.
by ralfthedog May 20, 2008 10:41 PM PDT
Outdated terminology. Why should a phone be used for voice chat? I find that feature quite annoying.
by lysdexia May 30, 2008 3:36 PM PDT
it's -> its
That's why the "i" is there, thas the retarded illiterate Commonwealth can't tell from "I".
by amandachuck May 20, 2008 12:17 PM PDT
3G is shorthand for the network speed, not the generation. This will be the 2nd iPhone, first on a 3G network, as the 1st Gen was on a 2.5G network. Which makes a lot of sense? ;)

Anyway, until email is searchable, I can't use the iPhone productively.

And the blogger leaves out the iMac and iBook, which busted back into the consumer and education realms with a vengeance. The progression went iMac, iBook, iPod, iPhone in order of hardware products that brought Apple back from nothing to meaning something again in the mainstream. In terms of software, the products were Final Cut Pro, OSX, and iTunes, none of which were based on Apple software? ;)
Reply to this comment
by rawhead909 May 20, 2008 12:29 PM PDT
"none of which were based on Apple software"

So... a piece of software has to be built from the ground-up in-house in order for the company to get respect for it?

FCP, OSX, and iTunes are great pieces of software on the Mac platform now because of what Apple did after they purchased them. Of course, suggesting that OSX is nothing more than a rebranded NeXT OS is disingenuous at best, but just take iTunes for example. iTunes became the great software it now is, not because it's a great MP3 juke box (although it is, and so was its predecessor) but because of the integration that was formed between it, the iPod, and iTunes Music Store, which was completely of Apple/Jobs doing.
by Mr. Dee May 20, 2008 12:37 PM PDT
I know I helped with the free publicity here in the Caribbean island of Jamaica. When it comes to talking about coolest, most innovative cellular phone, the iPhone just roles off my tongue. I haven't seen a phone like it that compares in integration, sleekness. The touch experience makes it like none other I have seen. Yes, Blackberry and many others are playing catch up now (HTC Touch), but there is just this legitimacy that the iPhone introduced that makes you conclude there is none other. In addition to that it creates a loyalty that its the phone I must have, although I don't own/can't afford one and its not officially supported here 'yet'.
Reply to this comment
by pgodfrey May 22, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
If it doesn't have a keyboard (button type) I don't want it.
by supoman May 20, 2008 12:38 PM PDT
True innovation should be praised. You guys spend equally as much ink talking about mediocre products. And if you could stack all the print you've gave to Microsoft who is the king of mediocre it would wrap around the solar system!!
Reply to this comment
by john55440 May 20, 2008 1:48 PM PDT
With Steve Job's Media Poodles, Apple hardly needs a marketing department. That said, Apple does a great job of bundling technologies that were invented by other companies and pretending that it's innovation; and they are masters of marketing pseudocool to wannabes.
Reply to this comment
by lysdexia May 30, 2008 3:42 PM PDT
OS X and its apps (Safari, HTTP Widgets) were not invented by other companies, nor were multitouch gestures or custom keyboards. Its millions-hue screen and long battery life beat out any competitor's model.
by falkensmaze May 20, 2008 1:55 PM PDT
whats an iphone?
Reply to this comment
by pgodfrey May 22, 2008 7:03 PM PDT
Nothing really that great...Just a cell phone that is way over priced - like everything apple makes.

I'll stick with my Black Berry...and when it wears out, I'll buy another Black Berry.

Apple makes some neat looking products - and I own two 30 gig ipods and a 4 gig nano...but that's where it ends.
by ceebee23 May 20, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
Yes Apple does bundle existing tech but the key is the way they bundle.... touch screen + phone was a new bundle and their implementation left the phone industry reeling and desperate to catch up.

Much as the original Macintosh bundled personal computer + GUI . That left Bill Gates playing catchup for a decade.
Reply to this comment
by Stefaninafla May 20, 2008 10:36 PM PDT
Still don't care, still don't plan to buy one. I want a phone that's just a phone, without all the other garbage on it.
Reply to this comment
by muskratboy May 21, 2008 10:10 AM PDT
And you damn kids get off my lawn! Back in MY day, coke was a nickle!
by nmc May 21, 2008 7:54 AM PDT
this is the update we've been waiting for and my chance to think about moving up to the iPhone at last!...let's hope the "just one more thing" part of the keynote has other gems such as improved battery life, slimmer/lighter design and/or more storage...can't wait, me is a happy Maccie! :o)
Reply to this comment
by totocalimero May 21, 2008 10:37 AM PDT
As an iPhone approved developer, I can only applaud to the new version of this technical marvel. A better network connectivity means we can now design software on the iPhone to be truly online, like a regular Mac.
Reply to this comment
by SaneMarketer May 21, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
It's not surprising that Apple would get so much free publicity from the iPhone - new and interesting products always do. Case history: Viagra. The year it launched, Pfizer spent just $50MM to advertise Viagra (relatively conservative amount for a major drug launch), but got nearly 100% awareness, way beyond what those dollars would have bought. That was mainly due to the media: news reports and references everywhere from talk shows, to late night TV, to Saturday Night Live. The public wanted to hear about Viagra, so the media reported on it. The same way people want to hear about Apple and their products. And as a gadget hound, the Sane Marketer is personally dying to get the 3G iPhone - marketingsanity.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg May 21, 2008 2:40 PM PDT
FYI the HTC touch came out before the iPhone.
Reply to this comment
by oldmanangry May 21, 2008 3:03 PM PDT
So, I guess this is the newstandard News.com now applies?

Is it true? Unknown
Is it newsworthy? No, because it's not known if it is true.
Will People read about it? Yes
Publish story? Yes

Let's apply this standard to this one now:

Steve Jobs routinely had employees tortured for fun.

Is it true? Unknown
Is it newsworthy? No, because it's not known if it is true.
Will People read about it? Yes
Publish story? Yes

Hmm. Notice how both stories would be published by news.com because it would pass the same stringent news standard.
Reply to this comment
by Sidric_The_Viking May 21, 2008 4:36 PM PDT
Great little article. On the mark. Steve gave his keynote about the iPhone in January '07 and the world sat up and took notice. He launched the 'iToy' par excellence (my wife bought me the 16Gb as a surprise on Irish launch day, March 14th and I'm still dying to see and hear all about the new one!!! - stuck in contract with this one until August '09 - maybe there'll be another model out by then?) and we haven't stopped talking about it since. It's one of those unpredictable occasions where we're all in a small way part of history. Like watching Neil and Buzz on the Moon at 5 in the morning (Irish time). Some moments are extra special. The iPhone is on of those things which has caused a stir and changed the game forever. This Viking is enjoying the whole buzz and chatter.
Wonder if they'll ever get Apple TV or its replacement to generate the same level of interest?
Reply to this comment
by SkateNY May 22, 2008 9:15 AM PDT
>>With Steve Job's Media Poodles, Apple hardly needs a marketing department. That said, Apple does a great job of bundling technologies that were invented by other companies and pretending that it's innovation; and they are masters of marketing pseudocool to wannabes.<<

If what you write were true, and if what you describe is as simple as you appear to suggest, then why is it so difficult for Apple's competitors to cash in by doing the same thing?

Sounds like just more sour grapes to me...
Reply to this comment
by SkateNY May 22, 2008 9:20 AM PDT
Um...telephone companies have been selling "phones that are just phones" for a couple of generations or so now. If you truly want to go to a day "when a company can make a phone that's just.... a phone," you'll first need to purchase a time machine.

I don't want Rolls Royce, but I also don't feel the need to complain about the fact that others might want to or that such a thing as a RR exists. Save your energy for all those futuristic phone calls you're looking forward/back to.
Reply to this comment
by socalfinest23 May 22, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
moron - 3G not 3rd Generation.....it's 3G technology vs. the EDGE - so ur internet is faster for u to download new Sanjaya videos u tool....
Reply to this comment
 See all 34 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

Apple's iPhone 2.2
hits the street

The latest software update offers several improvements to Google maps as well as wireless downloading for podcasts.



The big chill for holiday parties?

Tech companies faced with cost-cutting may not be canceling the annual festivities outright, but things are certainly being done differently this year.



About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right