Solazyme targets algae fuel in three years
In the race to make sustainably grown biofuels, algae is the great green hope.
Growing algae is not hard. But making enough to be competitive with fossil fuel prices has eluded the many companies and researchers betting on algae as a biofuel feedstock.
Solazyme CEO Jonathan Wolfson on Wednesday said that his company will be able to produce millions of gallons of algae-derived biodiesel in three years.

Solazyme's secret algae sauce. Click on image to see photo gallery from Solazyme's labs.
(Credit: James Martin/CNET )The reason Solazyme is on a faster track than many others is because it is taking a very different technology path, he said in a conference call with biofuels writers. The biotechnology company developed a process built off existing industrial equipment for fermentation and oil extraction, he said.
Most algae companies plan to grow algae in glass bioreactors or open ponds. They then harvest the plant and then squeeze out the oil.
Solazyme grows specially optimized algae in the dark in a large tank by feeding it with plants. The algae is then fermented and turned into oil, he explained. Its biodiesel recently was certified to work in diesel cars and can be used in existing oil refineries.
To ramp up, the company plans to lease or build a plant in the next two years with an eye toward commercial-scale manufacturing--on the order of millions of gallons a year--in three years, Wolfson said.
He said that many companies that rely on photosynthesis exclusively to grow algae are being overly optimistic on the amount of land that's required.
"It's our perspective that most numbers (on algae yield) are far in excess of reality, some are beyond theoretical," Wolfson said. Producing less than 10,000 thousand of algae per acre is realistic, "but you're not going to see 100,00 gallons per acre any time soon."
Carbon pricing
Algae has tremendous promise as a fuel feedstock. The primary challenge is producing it at large scale, said Jim McMillan, a researcher on biomass refining at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
"We need to see a model that can be propagated at large scale. Once we see that model, then we can see that templated and brought forward," he said.
Notwithstanding Solazyme's claims of producing cost-competitive fuel in three years, McMillan said it's difficult to say whether it will take 5 or 10 years for the entire algae fuel industry to find a way to produce biodiesel at large scale and economically.
McMillan said that the price of carbon emissions is the unknown in the race to commercialize algae biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol, made from wood chips, grasses, or agricultural wastes rather than corn.
"When you get to economics, you have to ask how are we valuing carbon," he said.
There is no federal restraint on carbon pollution in the U.S. now, although carbon emissions trading markets now operate in Europe and, starting this fall, states in the U.S. northeast. Federal climate legislation is expected to take shape during the next president's administration.
But even without a clear price signal on carbon, McMillan said that there are a number of cellulosic ethanol plants now in operation in the U.S., representing about 20 million gallons of ethanol a year, or the equivalent of one corn ethanol plant.
The cost associated with these demonstration plants should give producers and investors a better grip on the economics, he said.
Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.




The plant food that Solazymes algae will be using will use bigger amount of land and thus will have the same price effect when planting corn and use them for ethanol. This will NOT have any net advantages and the yield of biofuel from such a setup will not be any higher than biofuel from corn or sugarcane. It is simply converting corn or sugar cane into oil, and there you have the problem when food land are displaced by biofuel.
Pure Algae culture that produces their own oil would have been ideal. Just feed it carbon dioxide, initially dump some nutrients, then expose to the sun, and it should yield oil without displacing food.
When oil is harvested from such algae culture, the discarded "shells" of the algae can be recycled back into the growing chambers, so there is no need to add nutrients. The net effect is just harvesting the soil. The major advantage growing algae compared to crops is that most of the sunlight energy will be used for photosynthesis, and unlike terrestrial plants, most of the sunlight energy is spent evaporating the water. That is why biofuel from algae culture has several orders of magnitude better potential than biofuel from plants.
Solazyme's use of algae to produce biofuels by extracting food from terrestrial plants means that its overall efficiency will only be lower than or equal to that of producing biofuels from terrestrial plants directly. There is potential profit, however, in that if prices of sugars, starch and other plant food becomes lower than price of fuel, why not do it this way? At best, it is alternative to producing ethanol using yeast as the converting agents. But don't be fooled by Solazyme's technology that is simply riding on the popularity potential of algae, while in fact the algae is not functioning as an algae. The algae in their case simply functions like a bacteria and not helping at all in capturing the sun's energy to boost production of biofuel.
Anthony Kraudelt
3102 Lilac Haze Street
Las Vegas, NV
I'm hoping for the former but the suspense is still pretty high at this point.
So, it IS competing with foodcrops - whether it is corn, soybean or sugarcane. How is this solving any problem? The best it can do is being 100% efficient at converting sugar to oil/alcohol. But the underlying source - foodcrops, still exists. Old wine in a new bottle. Wake up and smell the fraud!
And why is this news? A very similar article had appeared a few months ago on this exact same company? C'mon Martin, do you actually have anything new to report?
Don't get me wrong. I am a big believer in green technology. I have been making generators and batteries myself since about age 12. But it upsets and angers me when there is greenwashing. Using human consumable food material for any type of energy does and will have disastrous consequences. Search for this important article on the web "How the rich starved the poor". If you haven't read it already, I guarantee it will be an eye-opener.
All the same, bio-diesel from spent oil, alcohol from switchgas, methane from wastes ... these are examples of things previously considered useless/waste into useful forms.
If the algae (in Lake Michigan or elsewhere) can be fed with non human-edible stuff, consider me sold.
Hold on a second !
They didn't reveal what their ?algae food? is. For all we know, they've found a way to use switchgrass pulp or plant wastes.
While I was shocked that they'd use algae in a dark reaction, if the ?food? they use can be harvested from unusable land, this IS a step forward.
And if they're clever enough to have found a way to use organic garbage like orange peel and crop residues, they deserve a Nobel Prize.
Besides, it's not as if this will derail the photosynthetic algae projects.
I've seen pics of a pilot project to capture flue gas from coal power plants via algae in plexiglass tubes, and I'm delighted at the prospect.