• On MovieTome: Megan Fox on TRANSFORMERS 2!
August 20, 2008 1:00 PM PDT

Solazyme targets algae fuel in three years

Posted by Martin LaMonica
  • Font size
  • Print

In the race to make sustainably grown biofuels, algae is the great green hope.

Growing algae is not hard. But making enough to be competitive with fossil fuel prices has eluded the many companies and researchers betting on algae as a biofuel feedstock.

Solazyme CEO Jonathan Wolfson on Wednesday said that his company will be able to produce millions of gallons of algae-derived biodiesel in three years.

Solazyme's secret algae sauce. Click on image to see photo gallery from Solazyme's labs.

(Credit: James Martin/CNET )

The reason Solazyme is on a faster track than many others is because it is taking a very different technology path, he said in a conference call with biofuels writers. The biotechnology company developed a process built off existing industrial equipment for fermentation and oil extraction, he said.

Most algae companies plan to grow algae in glass bioreactors or open ponds. They then harvest the plant and then squeeze out the oil.

Solazyme grows specially optimized algae in the dark in a large tank by feeding it with plants. The algae is then fermented and turned into oil, he explained. Its biodiesel recently was certified to work in diesel cars and can be used in existing oil refineries.

To ramp up, the company plans to lease or build a plant in the next two years with an eye toward commercial-scale manufacturing--on the order of millions of gallons a year--in three years, Wolfson said.

He said that many companies that rely on photosynthesis exclusively to grow algae are being overly optimistic on the amount of land that's required.

"It's our perspective that most numbers (on algae yield) are far in excess of reality, some are beyond theoretical," Wolfson said. Producing less than 10,000 thousand of algae per acre is realistic, "but you're not going to see 100,00 gallons per acre any time soon."

Carbon pricing
Algae has tremendous promise as a fuel feedstock. The primary challenge is producing it at large scale, said Jim McMillan, a researcher on biomass refining at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).

"We need to see a model that can be propagated at large scale. Once we see that model, then we can see that templated and brought forward," he said.

Notwithstanding Solazyme's claims of producing cost-competitive fuel in three years, McMillan said it's difficult to say whether it will take 5 or 10 years for the entire algae fuel industry to find a way to produce biodiesel at large scale and economically.

McMillan said that the price of carbon emissions is the unknown in the race to commercialize algae biodiesel and cellulosic ethanol, made from wood chips, grasses, or agricultural wastes rather than corn.

"When you get to economics, you have to ask how are we valuing carbon," he said.

There is no federal restraint on carbon pollution in the U.S. now, although carbon emissions trading markets now operate in Europe and, starting this fall, states in the U.S. northeast. Federal climate legislation is expected to take shape during the next president's administration.

But even without a clear price signal on carbon, McMillan said that there are a number of cellulosic ethanol plants now in operation in the U.S., representing about 20 million gallons of ethanol a year, or the equivalent of one corn ethanol plant.

The cost associated with these demonstration plants should give producers and investors a better grip on the economics, he said.

Martin LaMonica is a senior writer for CNET's Green Tech blog. He started at CNET News in 2002, covering IT and Web development. Before that, he was executive editor at IT publication InfoWorld. E-mail Martin.
Recent posts from Green Tech
Termite stomach bug to make ethanol
Cree wins contract to light the Pentagon
Energy monitor sees $7.5 million in funding round
Public clean-tech firms get clobbered
Firm claims silver bullet for 'vampire loads'
HP offers money for old tech equipment
Green news harvest: How to create clean-tech jobs
Green-tech VC jumps nearly 40 percent in 2008
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 10 comments
by Joe Real August 20, 2008 2:09 PM PDT
This procedure can be profitable is done this way, but it is a big step backward.This is a big step backward because the algae are not used to capture the carbon dioxide, fueled by the sun, to produce biofuel. In the case of Solazyme they are simply using algae, the equivalent of a genetically engineered bacteria, whose simple function is to convert food derived from other plants into fuel oil. Other genetically engineered bacteria would be better to use than algae.

The plant food that Solazymes algae will be using will use bigger amount of land and thus will have the same price effect when planting corn and use them for ethanol. This will NOT have any net advantages and the yield of biofuel from such a setup will not be any higher than biofuel from corn or sugarcane. It is simply converting corn or sugar cane into oil, and there you have the problem when food land are displaced by biofuel.

Pure Algae culture that produces their own oil would have been ideal. Just feed it carbon dioxide, initially dump some nutrients, then expose to the sun, and it should yield oil without displacing food.
When oil is harvested from such algae culture, the discarded "shells" of the algae can be recycled back into the growing chambers, so there is no need to add nutrients. The net effect is just harvesting the soil. The major advantage growing algae compared to crops is that most of the sunlight energy will be used for photosynthesis, and unlike terrestrial plants, most of the sunlight energy is spent evaporating the water. That is why biofuel from algae culture has several orders of magnitude better potential than biofuel from plants.

Solazyme's use of algae to produce biofuels by extracting food from terrestrial plants means that its overall efficiency will only be lower than or equal to that of producing biofuels from terrestrial plants directly. There is potential profit, however, in that if prices of sugars, starch and other plant food becomes lower than price of fuel, why not do it this way? At best, it is alternative to producing ethanol using yeast as the converting agents. But don't be fooled by Solazyme's technology that is simply riding on the popularity potential of algae, while in fact the algae is not functioning as an algae. The algae in their case simply functions like a bacteria and not helping at all in capturing the sun's energy to boost production of biofuel.
Reply to this comment
by anthonysmission August 20, 2008 2:14 PM PDT
Can I get a car that runs on green goo?

Anthony Kraudelt
3102 Lilac Haze Street
Las Vegas, NV
Reply to this comment
by WittsendinTX August 20, 2008 2:31 PM PDT
I work in the Horticulture industry and the "algae production" facilities I've seen are a joke. These are designed by university types who don't have a clue how to "grow plants". I work with people who have fully automated facilities of 100 to 200 acres, with "bench sections" that are 6' x 20' and automatic watering systems attached to fill them and flush them out, attached to monitoring systems to control fertilizer and environment. These benches are used by the millions in greenhouses all over the world and could probably turn over a new crop of algae every week or two.
Reply to this comment
by Joe Real August 20, 2008 4:54 PM PDT
I fully agree with you! The algae production facilities by a lot of the start up companies, even those who claimed to have been doing it for ages, are either very crude or very fancifully expensive, compared to the very practical but fully automated systems currently used for growing high valued terrestrial plants. If they had used such automated growing systems for algae, they should be able to churn out at least 15,000 gallons of biofuel per acre per year, and for a continuous culture, that would be 288 gallons/acre/week. For a 200 acre utility, that would be 57,692 gallons/week. Algae culture is best approached with a continuous culture automated method.
by billmosby August 20, 2008 2:55 PM PDT
So the question remains: algae oil- easy as pie, or pie in the sky?

I'm hoping for the former but the suspense is still pretty high at this point.
Reply to this comment
by WittsendinTX August 20, 2008 7:00 PM PDT
My point is, if they are getting close to "break even" with their current production systems for growing the algae, imagine how much better a job they could do with a "real" production system.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy August 20, 2008 9:58 PM PDT
I totally agree with Joe Real. With picture 5 in the link provided it says "Inside this small-scale fermenter, algae cultures eat away at carbohydrates like sugar cane in order to grow and produce oil."

So, it IS competing with foodcrops - whether it is corn, soybean or sugarcane. How is this solving any problem? The best it can do is being 100% efficient at converting sugar to oil/alcohol. But the underlying source - foodcrops, still exists. Old wine in a new bottle. Wake up and smell the fraud!

And why is this news? A very similar article had appeared a few months ago on this exact same company? C'mon Martin, do you actually have anything new to report?
Reply to this comment
by djacobsonw August 21, 2008 9:07 AM PDT
Why personalize information and turn your idea into a negative comment, tech_crazy? The green tech writers are doing the information business a SERVICE. Algae in the Great Lakes, specifically Lake Michigan, is rampant due to the TIF districts for farmers close to Lake Michigan. Phosphorous runs into the lake. So, the other day while swimming in Wisconsin, I came out of the water and green algae was all over me. Can't the farmers use other chemicals and recycle the algae; each state is awash with ideas and no central policy to try not to pollute and, in the meantime, the fishing industry in Lake Michigan and the "swimming" recreation is being hindered.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy August 22, 2008 2:05 AM PDT
djacobsonw ,

Don't get me wrong. I am a big believer in green technology. I have been making generators and batteries myself since about age 12. But it upsets and angers me when there is greenwashing. Using human consumable food material for any type of energy does and will have disastrous consequences. Search for this important article on the web "How the rich starved the poor". If you haven't read it already, I guarantee it will be an eye-opener.

All the same, bio-diesel from spent oil, alcohol from switchgas, methane from wastes ... these are examples of things previously considered useless/waste into useful forms.

If the algae (in Lake Michigan or elsewhere) can be fed with non human-edible stuff, consider me sold.
Reply to this comment
by Jkirk3279 August 24, 2008 4:14 PM PDT
? It is simply converting corn or sugar cane into oil, and there you have the problem when food land are displaced by biofuel.?

Hold on a second !

They didn't reveal what their ?algae food? is. For all we know, they've found a way to use switchgrass pulp or plant wastes.

While I was shocked that they'd use algae in a dark reaction, if the ?food? they use can be harvested from unusable land, this IS a step forward.

And if they're clever enough to have found a way to use organic garbage like orange peel and crop residues, they deserve a Nobel Prize.


Besides, it's not as if this will derail the photosynthetic algae projects.

I've seen pics of a pilot project to capture flue gas from coal power plants via algae in plexiglass tubes, and I'm delighted at the prospect.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


About Green Tech

Innovation in energy and environmental technologies is long overdue, in business and at home. Green-tech guru Martin LaMonica and other CNET writers serve up fresh clean-tech news and commentary.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Green Tech topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right