April 11, 2008 12:56 PM PDT

I'll pass on the Pixies LP, but here's 10 bucks

Earlier this week, The New York Times had a nostalgic little piece about the Princeton Record Exchange, a music store in the eponymous New Jersey college town.

It was, as one might expect, the sort of narrative that could be written about any beloved indie-music haven these days: it's a quirky anachronism in a world that really doesn't need it anymore, but it keeps on trucking.

It was a story that hit close to home for me. I lived in Princeton, which lies roughly halfway between New York and Philadelphia, for roughly 15 years, from preadolescence into my early 20s. For a sizeable chunk of that time, I was a Record Exchange regular. I'd pick through the shelves, hunting for something that looked kind of cool or bugging the staff for recommendations. Plus, it was two blocks away from the ice cream shop where I worked in high school. It was a nice place to blow a paycheck on the way home.

Would I do that now? No. Reading that Times article turned me on to the realization that music stores like the Record Exchange no longer have a place in my life. As a music fan who's eagerly plunged into the Digital Age--I had an iPod back when they were chubby!--this is somewhat of a disconcerting revelation. But I realized something else: I'd gladly fork over that $4.99 for a second-hand Pavement album, but I wouldn't take the CD with me. I'd really just like to keep the store in business.

I wonder if I was part of the last generation of teenagers to consider browsing through record store racks to be an essential pastime. The iTunes Store launched in 2003, when I was 18. Ten years from now, will the whole industry be digital, save for a few holdouts, retired hippies, and former indie-pop boys who don't look so cute, now that they're going bald?

I, for one, can't remember the last time I bought a CD, since my entire music collection is now on a hard drive. I haven't been to the Record Exchange in ages, nor do I poke my head into the scattered record shops that line the streets of the neighborhood where I now live in New York.

Call me a terrible excuse for a music fan, but I don't have any use for it; since I was never a vinyl collector (the story would be very different if I were a DJ), I welcomed the opportunity to free up bookshelf space by getting rid of all those darned CD cases.

But the real reason I don't go back to record stores isn't because I can buy music online, it's because I can discover it there. In my days of frequenting the Princeton Record Exchange, it was the late '90s and early '00s, before I owned a laptop or even a cell phone, when my house still had dial-up AOL. It was also the age of Clear Channel radio domination, rife with pre-bizarro Britney, 'N Sync, and embarrassing excuses for "rock" (who remembers when Fred Durst was cool?)

I didn't live in a city, so I wasn't surrounded by concert venues; I found new music by listening to a few good radio stations (Princeton's indomitable WPRB, as well as a now-defunct indie-rock station from the Jersey Shore that I could get only by taping makeshift antenna wires to my bedroom wall) or poking around the Record Exchange.

Before Last.fm, Hype Machine, and Muxtape, this was how I defined "music discovery." It was a lot more of a gamble. There were more than a few occasions when I picked something up at the Record Exchange just because the album art was cool. Bad idea. Now that I have the ability to preview something on Stereogum, read an appropriately convoluted review on Pitchfork, and stream it on Imeem before opting to plunk down $.99 for it on Amazon MP3, I'm saving money in addition to space.

Last year, a popular independent bookstore in Princeton (another frequent drain on my ice cream store paychecks, back in the day) succumbed to the Amazon juggernaut and shut its doors. Now, I still go to bookstores, namely the droolworthy Strand near Union Square in Manhattan. Most of the time, though, I don't know what I'm looking for--I'm there for the search, not the retail. If I have a specific target, say, if my editor wants me to pick up The Complete Idiot's Guide to Punctuation, I load up Amazon and order away.

"Book discovery" online is eons behind music discovery, perhaps because you can't toss Hemingway and Hardy into an algorithm quite as easily as Hot Chip. But still, my offline-reading experience is migrating increasingly online; I've recently become a fan of Goodreads, and I subscribe to Flavorpill's Boldtype newsletter. Then there's the fact that my addiction to the contents of my Google Reader means I'm already reading fewer books and magazines (sad, I know). It's made me start to wonder, in light of my Record Exchange realization, if one day I'd also feel like supporting a small bookstore, just to keep it alive.

The notion of paying to keep something obsolete in business effectively makes it a museum. And the Times profile of the Princeton Record Exchange, with its quips about comically pretentious staffers and eccentric clientele who drive for hours just to get there, not to mention the decor ("early-dorm room with dorky posters, wood-plank ceiling, gray linoleum and an emaciated gray carpet"), reeks of a This American Life-worthy cultural vignette.

The digital-media revolution is all about efficiency, convenience, and accessibility, none of which apply to small-time music stores, where you have to flip through racks of CDs to find the one you want, only to learn that it's sold out. But is that all bad? Perhaps one day, we'll put that kind of musty inefficiency on a pedestal as a charming relic of the old days, an alternative to the everything-at-your-fingertips world that Larry and Sergey brought us.

And indeed, if I had the cash on hand, I'd support an independent record store for the same reason that some well-heeled philanthropists funnel money into historic-preservation funds for landmarks they'll never see. We don't necessarily need them for ourselves; for one reason or another, we just need to know that they exist.

Recent posts from The Social
'Facebook: The Movie': Now, who should play Mark Zuckerberg?
'Lonelygirl15' creators unveil new Web show, 'The Resistance'
Technorati acquires 'online magazine' Blogcritics
Reddit now lets you create your own social news site
Another nail in the 'Scrabulous' coffin
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments
Limp Biscuits 'n Gravy
by digitalhecht April 11, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
Fred Durst was never, ever cool. If there's one genre that exemplifies ClearChannel's lameness, it's rap rock (for which whiny Freddie was its chief evangelist). On a related note (ClearChannel's lowest common demoninator programming), whom exactly are Seven Mary Three sleeping with? "Possum Nation" STILL gets played into the ground on their stations. Oh wait, it mentions Jesus in the song. Never mind...
Reply to this comment View reply
wprb is not defunct
by metafizikal April 11, 2008 2:14 PM PDT
and it is based in princeton.

also there is a ton of stuff that is simply not available on the
internet or sometimes even cd. hence the record exchange is still
popular.
Reply to this comment View reply
I can see the point.
by hunter_jc April 11, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
I heaven't bought a north american cds for a long time. I use iTunes store. Believe me, I think i probably would spend less on foreign CD if they start to sell on iTunes too. I just laid down $60 for two foreign CD.
Reply to this comment
You are a terrible excuse for a music fan
by skellener April 11, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
There, I said it.
Reply to this comment
There will always be vestiges
by gregorytga April 11, 2008 2:50 PM PDT
Most dealers probably will die, good riddance Sam Goodie, but I
read that Amoba Records business is still going strong.
Whenever I'm in LA I try and hit up the shop. There's still an
endearing side of flipping through loud clunky clacking cases,
trying to score a find.

Sadly the mom and pops stores, the special interest places and
the dedicated to scenes shops will die. Music e-tailers are our
new overlords but at least there's never a sold out, never a line
and infinitely more selection. I remember buying CDs in 1992
and the limited selections but the internet revolution has really
birthed subgenring to the extreme allowing people find
themselves musically to a degree never possible before. Its not
without side effects with the indie-than-thou snobbery but I
scored the perfect age to watch my music grow up as I did, and
now there's an entire scene of indie/underground hip hop artists
that reflect more maturity, humor and wit that I wouldn't have
found without aid of the internet. There's some real causalities,
such as artists able to support themselves by sales.

Whatever the music industry is today won't be what it is in 10
years...
Reply to this comment
Still need better quality right now
by Jac Koff April 11, 2008 3:25 PM PDT
I agree that in 10 years it should all be digital. My only hope is
that they start to bring up the quality of the sound to whatever I
may want. I will not buy any music that I can't get on a CD. I one
want a copy that sounds better than anything I can currently buy
online, (legally). I currently use lossless to cut the CD in about half
and keep a good clean sound. When you start to get into really
good headphones, home stereo, or car stereo it's a must as you
will start to hear all the things you miss from 256k and below...
Reply to this comment
You wouldn't know music if it bit you on the a**.
by snapelicious April 11, 2008 3:32 PM PDT
When I was young, we had a toy called a "Close 'n' Play" that would
play 7" records (usually by bands like The Archies!) As I grew up,
and began to truly understand and appreciate real MUSIC, I realized
the importance of audio fidelity. Today's children, like Ms.
McCarthy, still listen to their "music" on toys (now called iPods) and
probably couldn't tell the difference between a harmonium and an
accordion.
Reply to this comment View reply
I see what you are saying, but...
by kromaethius007 April 11, 2008 4:17 PM PDT
I enjoyed the article and I am much older than you are so I remember the record stores and the countless of hours in them looking through the vinyl. It all started back for me in 1969 with the purchase of Led Zeppelin I, and in late that year Led Zeppelin II and it didn't stop there.

Through the 8-track and cassette era I migrated to the CD format. After dabling in the on-line lackluster quality of the horrid download bitrates of music, I felt that the record industry should pay me the $9.99 an album to be forced to listen to.

Now don't get me wrong, I think putting One's whole music collection to "digital" is great. I have two terrabytes of HD FLAC Loseless covering hundreds of artists and over a thousand albums all taken from CD and Vinyl piped and re-engineered through products like Sony's SoundForge to clean up the haphazard engineering -- Yes, I am an audiophile so it's no wonder with thousands of dollars invested into my music hardware, I want to get the best I can get without the DRM crap.

I purchase all my usic legally and like the old days, after I purchase it, I should be able to put it to any format and on any device I own for myself -- Hence FLAC and transcode only for my IPod with no less than 320 bitrate and that is as low as I can or want to go.

Even most of the radio stations out there have gone to low quality bitrates and pipe out the music at these rates through the airwaves -- Pitty.

Until places like iTunes and Amazon Music starts selling lossless bitrates I will not indulge and continue to purchase the 16 bit 44,000Khz music.
Reply to this comment
Gotta reply...
by crue24 April 11, 2008 5:30 PM PDT
I have a few comments: as a 30 year old with a wide variety of
tastes, I have a few responses.

I agree with the sentimental aspect and I hope the classic stores
survive, but knowing me, I'll never be there. I'm too lazy, buy it
online.

In regards to the audio quality, personally I think iTunes quality
is great, especially iTunes+. The only time I truly notice a
difference and prefer the highest quality possible is classical.
There you (or at least I) can tell the difference. But when I'm
listening to the oldies, i almost prefer the less quality. Sinatra
shouldn't be crystal clear, it should sound like it's being played
through a scratched record player even if it is on my iPod in this
digital world.

As for the guy who said Fred Durst sucks, no way, open your
mind to other music. Limp Biskut definitely isn't an Aerosmith
or Led Zeplin, but when your at the top of the terrain park, ready
to hit the jumps on your snowboard, nothing gets you juiced like
Fred's "Hot Dog" or "My Generation".

Music is for the occasion. Relaxing or working: YoYo Ma, date
with the woman you might marry: Sinatra or Marvin Gaye, girl
you picked up at the bar: keith sweat or R.kelley, snowboarding:
Limp Biskut or P.O.D. Just about all music can be appreciated in
the right setting. Don't call yourself a true fan if you can't
appreciate it all.
Reply to this comment
Prententious
by ianfollett April 11, 2008 5:36 PM PDT
This guy is a pretentious prick. He needs to practice his faux-humble act a little more before he writes another article lamenting the state of culture retail.
Reply to this comment View reply
Snark all you like, but she's right
by Ikthog April 12, 2008 3:56 PM PDT
Whether or not some of you like Caroline's point of view, it represents the reality of the way music is experienced by her generation, and many others as well. The rampant success of the iPod and downloaded music makes one thing perfectly clear: a vast swath, probably the majority, of popular music fans are perfectly willing to trade a certain amount of quality for easy access to music.

I'm older than she is, but my experience has been largely the same: I used to love digging the through racks at the local indie record stores in San Francisco and Minneapolis looking for new bands and cheap used CDs, but I seldom bother anymore. Not only is it easier to find and obtain music online, but you never have to worry about a hot new CD being sold out, you don't have to keep track of CDs and cases (the back seat of my car used to be a CD graveyard), and it's easier to access your music in multiple locations.

Like Carolyn, I would like to support the local stores, but I don't have much interest in buying CDs at this point. It's not that CDs have no inherent value -- the cover and artwork is definitely a part of the experience that I miss, and having a physical backup is never a bad thing -- but when I can sit in my office, or in a coffee shop, and download that song I can't get out of my head from iTunes on my iPhone, it's difficult to justify CD hunting.

If you must have pristine audio quality, it's still available. But my guess is even most of those who decry the allegedly horrendous quality of commercial downloaded music still have quite a bit of it.
Reply to this comment View reply
Really sad
by rapier1 April 14, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
The problem you have Caroline is that it seems that going to the
Exchange wasn't a social activity for you. For some of us who cut
out teeth on used record stores it wasn't just a place to get music -
it was a place to have real face to face conversations with people
that really cared about music. Sure, you can sort of kind of get a
sad and lonely approximation of that online - but it doesn't
compare to the real benefits of *talking* to someone standing next
to you while slowly flipping through albums.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About The Social

CNET News' Caroline McCarthy is a downtown Manhattanite who believes that, despite popular opinion, the Web can actually help your social life. She's happily addicted to fun social-media tools from Twitter to Yelp to Facebook, sends an inordinate number of text messages, and has a tendency to waste time at the office reading restaurant blogs. Here, she explores all facets of the Web's gregarious side, as well as the unique tech culture in her home city of New York. (Don't call it Silicon Alley.)

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Social topics

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right