November 28, 2007 2:45 PM PST

Bush administration forced to turn over spying documents by Friday

A federal judge has ordered the Bush administration to divulge documents related to immunizing telecommunications companies from lawsuits, saying they illegally opened their networks to the National Security Agency.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco gave the Office of the Director of National Intelligence until November 30 (Friday) to turn over documents relating to conversations it had with Congress and telecommunications carriers about how to rewrite wiretapping laws.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation had filed this case to seek faster processing of a Freedom of Information Act request it filed, which could help buttress its ongoing lawsuit against AT&T. There are approximately 250 pages of unclassified material and 65 pages of classified material, which would be redacted, that the administration has identified but said could not be turned over until December 31.

Note that Illston's order doesn't deal with the NSA's wiretapping program itself (how it works, what companies are involved, whether there really is a secret room at AT&T's 611 Folsom Street location). Instead the documents relate only to conversations and communications about retroactive immunity for companies like AT&T that are accused of violating the law.

Note also that if AT&T and other telecommunications companies followed the law, no retroactive immunity is necessary. Because AT&T and the Bush administration are supporting such a legal shield, you can draw your own conclusions about what's really going on.

The Friday deadline means that the documents will likely be available in time to influence congressional debate over amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Some FISA amendments expire in February 2008, which means that Congress is likely to return to the topic soon.

The House of Representatives rejected retroactive immunity on November 16. The Senate Judiciary Committee seemed to like the idea of immunity, but the debate is expected to resume on the Senate floor next month.

Recent posts from News - Politics and Law
How to get thrown into a Chinese prison
Few tech tracks for McCain's VP pick
Hans Reiser gets 15 years to life for murdering wife
Video: Democratic convention, day 4 recap
McCain taps outsider Palin to be VP
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 28 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
It Figures! Another Liberal Activist Judge Trying to Re-Write Laws
by WJeansonne November 28, 2007 3:27 PM PST
What a joke! Won't these terrorist hugging fools for judges go and try to save to some whales or something rather than interfere with the Bush Administration's attempt to thwart terrorism. It's totally disgusting and these creeps should be removed from office--ASAP! But fat chance in hell coming from San Francisco.
Reply to this comment View all 9 replies
Finally a little check on power
by deemzzzz November 29, 2007 1:20 AM PST
The Bush administration has had far too long with almost no checks on power. Thank you judiciary branch!

I know there are those who will say that if you are not a terrorist you should have nothing to hide. To those I would say that there are many reasons for keeping private data private until there is a subpoena.

To the nutjob with the first posting - why not have the FBI or NSA search through your house without a warrant or probable cause. These records are not for actual suspects but anyone that is in the extended social network of potential suspects. That why they can't get a subpoena. I'm sure you are somehow connected to a suspect a few degrees away (6 or 7? can't be too safe these days) so if you're not doing anything illegal you have nothing to hide.
Reply to this comment View reply
Who are these people anyway?
by tvstrategies November 29, 2007 1:35 PM PST
Who are these people that call patriots - such as the Judge, the EFF and the US (Democrat) congress - a bunch of liberal hacks?

Who hires these "conservative" flamethrowers to spew venom at the people who want to preserve the real America?

I can't imagine any of them thinking for themselves. They must be that 23% of people that can't be turned, once they make up their minds, fact or not.

I just don't get it
Reply to this comment
 See all 28 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About News - Politics and Law

Lead contributor Declan McCullagh has covered politics, technology, and Washington, D.C., for more than a decade, which has turned him into an iconoclast and a skeptic of anyone who says, "We oughta have a new federal law against this."

Add this feed to your online news reader

News - Politics and Law topics

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right