February 29, 2008 10:14 AM PST

Report: Apple to retain tight control over iPhone apps

Updated at 3:40pm PT after coming across another report.

The latest report on the proposed iPhone software development kit would suggest that Apple is planning a restrictive policy for application development.

iLounge reported Friday that the iPhone SDK will come along with restrictions on what kinds of iPhone and iPod Touch applications can be developed, where they can be sold, and what types of peripheral devices they can access. While not a shock, if true that type of policy will not please software developers who were hoping for more open access to the iPhone.

If true, Apple's iPhone application policy isn't going to please the development community.

(Credit: CNET Networks)

The specifics? Apple would apparently mandate that all iPhone or iPod Touch applications be sold through the iTunes Store. That's not too surprising, since the iTunes software is the primary vehicle for getting software updates and contacts onto or off of the iPhone. And the visibility of the iTunes Store would be a boon to smaller developers trying to get noticed.

Secondly, the report says Apple will deny developers access to the iPhone or iPod Touch dock, meaning their software would be unable to talk to third-party peripherals like keyboards or audio equipment. The applications could use the basic functions of the iPhone, such as the phone, Wi-Fi, and camera, according to the report, but that keeps developers inside a relatively small box.

The detail that will generate the most angst and frustration, however, would be Apple's apparent plan to serve as the clearing house for all proposed applications. The company would retain veto power over the number and types of applications that could be installed on an iPhone, meaning no application could be officially released without a thumbs-up from an Apple committee or executive.

If true, this policy would fall heavily to the "restrictive" side of the application-development spectrum outlined we outlined earlier this week. Apple plans to reveal the actual details at an event in Cupertino next Thursday.

UPDATED 3:40pm - Electronista is now reporting that the restrictions might only apply to paid applications, and that free applications destined for the iPhone or the iPod Touch would not be subject to the same kinds of limits. This would be very helpful for extremely small developers or homegrown application development inside companies, but would still mean Apple plans to control the marketplace for iPhone applications.

Recent posts from One More Thing
One iPhone to live: Today's episode
Intel Germany executive reportedly confirms Atom-based iPhone
IBM putting Lotus Connections on BlackBerry
Verizon, Mozilla to join LiMo Foundation
RIM to hold BlackBerry developer conference
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 58 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Stand by
by Lee in San Diego February 29, 2008 10:41 AM PST
The whines should start soon
Reply to this comment
restrictive software policies?? apple?? really??
by veritas72 February 29, 2008 11:11 AM PST
This type of software licensing restriction is precisely what almost knocked Apple out of the PC market... I thought one was supposed to learn from their mistakes, no?? Here's to history repeating itself.
Reply to this comment View reply
The iPhone Will Soon Fade Away
by sismoc February 29, 2008 11:16 AM PST
Jobs and his "control freak" personality will kill off all 3rd party enthusiasm. This will combine with other much more open platforms to sound the death knell for the iPhone.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
I have one word for you .....
by sanjayb February 29, 2008 11:19 AM PST
Jailbreak!
Reply to this comment View reply
iPhone is a platform and not a computer
by winstein February 29, 2008 11:28 AM PST
So Apple think the iPhone is more like a Wii/PS3 than it is like a computer. Only time will tell.
Reply to this comment View reply
C|Net isn't news apparently
by ewelch February 29, 2008 11:39 AM PST
So you call yourself news.com. And yet you report hearsay like this without a single moment's hesitation? Sorry, but you just proved that the people who edit this site don't know the meaning of the word news. I learned in Journalism 101 that this kind of reporting is not only unethical, but bad for business.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
iPhone Gack
by Renegade Knight February 29, 2008 12:09 PM PST
If you want to sell me a phone, make it useful. The small developers and hobbiests are the ones who will make that phone more useful than the developers who can work with $uch Re$trictive Term$.
Reply to this comment View reply
One thing and one thing only...
by MTGrizzly February 29, 2008 12:55 PM PST
That will make this phone great... I take a lot of pictures with my DSLR. Looking at the images on the LCD on the back of my 350D is okay, but not that helpful. To really make the iPhone and iPod Touch really worthwhile, Apple needs to put a compatible USB port on the things with software that allows me to plug a CF card reader to it and download and view all my pictures... There are dedicated hard drive/LCD screen devices that do this, but why carry something else when the iPhone/iPod Touch could do the job. That I know of, there isn't any currently available Windows mobile device that will do this...
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Restrictions?
by ugandhar February 29, 2008 1:51 PM PST
boooooooooo ! apple is again trying to tell me ; what should be or should not be on my phone!!!!!
Reply to this comment
Is it your phone or Apple's?
by Vegaman_Dan February 29, 2008 1:59 PM PST
If Apple is going to control all application installations from iTunes, that means they get to decide what you can and cannot have on your iPhone. They will have the freedom to remove applications from your phone if they so choose- no, you don't have a choice in the matter. There is no legal reason why you should. You agreed to the EULA by use of the phone. Now this may mean we'll get lots of great applications that are secure and solid. It also could mean we may not see the huge number of apps available like that of the Palm or Windows platforms where people have the freedom to do what they will with the unit. It's a tradeoff. I haven't heard of the numbers yet, but I am willing to believe that Apple will be charging fees to have applications distributed through the iTunes store. It's too easy for them to see this as a source of revenue. Will they be charging developers a fee to get their applications listed? Will developers have to pay a subscription fee to keep those apps available or if they drop out, will Apple then remotely remove all applications by that developer? They are within their legal rights to do so. It's a good way to ensure you're taking money from developers and consumers alike. We'll know more once they officially announce their plans.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About One More Thing

  • At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News.com's Tom Krazit will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies strike back against the iPhone, and chipmakers try to figure out how to move past PCs and slip into a little something more comfortable.
    Email Tom at Tom.Krazit@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Stuff I'm reading:

Blogroll

Latest blog posts from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

Resource center from News.com sponsors

advertisement
On GameSpot: Banjo and Kazooie return on the Xbox 360
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: