March 19, 2008 12:03 PM PDT

Adobe realizes SDK not enough for Flash on iPhone

Adobe has admitted it can't bring Flash to the iPhone just because it thinks that would be a neat idea.

Comments made Tuesday by Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen were widely interpreted Wednesday morning as confirmation that Adobe and Apple have figured out a way to make Flash available on the iPhone. Unfortunately, that's not exactly what Narayen said, and the company has now also clarified that it can't simply use the iPhone software development kit to bring Flash to the iPhone unless Apple approves.

Narayen's comments weren't exactly definitive, but they were judged by several media outlets to be a confirmation of Adobe and Apple's plans to put a Flash player on the iPhone. They aren't; they're merely a statement of what Adobe would like to do with Flash. Wishing things to happen and actually making them happen are sort of different.

Getting Flash onto the iPhone will require fancier footwork than getting AIM onto the iPhone.

(Credit: Corinne Schulze/CNET Networks)

On Tuesday, Narayen said, "We are also committed to bringing the Flash experience to the iPhone and we will work with Apple. We've evaluated the SDK, we can now start to develop the Flash player ourselves and we think it benefits our joint customers."

The comments came during a conference call announcing Adobe's quarterly earnings (the company did pretty well). Adobe obviously would like to get Flash on one of the most buzzed-about mobile Web surfing devices in recent history, especially coming off its deal to license it for Windows Mobile, but let's look a little closer at Narayen's statement.

First of all, working with Apple can mean very many things, and that seems to have been missed in the early reports. "Working with (company)" often means you're trying to sell skeptical executives on the merits of your idea, not actually collaborating on technical development. If you call up Apple with a great idea, and leave a voicemail on Tim Cook's extension with your pitch, technically you're working with Apple.

But Narayen also seems to have misunderstood the terms of the SDK, much like Sun executives did when they announced, then backed off, plans to release Java for the iPhone.

Flash isn't a mere third-party application, like a game or an instant-messaging client. It's a plug-in that would have to work very closely with Safari on the iPhone, and that's something Apple has declared off-limits to third-party developers at this time unless they get a hall pass.

And even if Adobe was granted a special dispensation to dig deeper into the iPhone, it couldn't actually distribute Flash onto the iPhone unless Apple approved its inclusion in the App Store or bundled it with the iPhone. That is, unless Adobe wants to hook up all those jailbroken iPhones with Flash, which I guess it could technically do but would probably ruin its chances of ever getting an official blessing for Flash on the iPhone.

Adobe clarified Narayen's comments in an official statement on Wednesday.

"Adobe has evaluated the iPhone SDK and can now start to develop a way to bring Flash Player to the iPhone. However, to bring the full capabilities of Flash to the iPhone Web-browsing experience we do need to work with Apple beyond and above what is available through the SDK and the current license around it." Key words there: "beyond and above" (I always thought it was the other way around).

Now, none of this means Apple and Adobe really aren't working to bring Flash to the iPhone. There are clearly benefits to having Flash, even Flash Lite, on a mobile device, and the two companies have worked closely for years. Apple CEO Steve Jobs' main problem with the technology is that he believes Flash is too big, and Flash Lite is too small, for the iPhone.

It's quite possible that the two companies are working together "beyond and above" on making this happen, and Narayen simply spoke out of school regarding their secret project. However, it's important to note any such collaboration is not what Narayen implied, which was that Adobe could just put Flash Lite on the iPhone using the SDK.

I asked an Adobe representative to comment on whether or not that technical collaboration was taking place, and they're looking into it. Don't hold your breath waiting for an update.

Recent posts from One More Thing
The Open Computing experiment begins
AMD tears up server road map to push stability
AT&T: No vacation around the iPhone anniversary
'Consumer Reports': Apple tech support is aces
Another Mac clone maker spotted on eBay
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 15 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Day late and dollars short
by aburd1 March 19, 2008 12:51 PM PDT
As a developer of mobile apps. I have come to realize that this is about money. If Flash runs on the iPhone why would devs. spend the money on the SDK? The real loser is the end consumer who is stuck with a flat experience for and expensive phone. In the mean time programs such as Rocketshotz, Twitter, and other mobile tools will just have to do the best they can
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
I block flash
by bobcode March 19, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
Flash blocker is my favorite extension in FireFox and I don't mix Flash much, even in Safari for Windows.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Great news
by law_hog March 19, 2008 4:13 PM PDT
I'm not an iPhone user, but how can this be bad news? Since Adobe got their hands on Macromedia, Flash player has turned into one buggy web component. Crashes Firefox with alarming ease. I would hate to be an iPhone user and have the thing freeze.
Reply to this comment
Here's an idea...
by RideMan March 22, 2008 6:38 PM PDT
How about Adobe and Apple get together and build a working Flash player component for QuickTime. That would kill two birds with one stone: it would solve the problem of getting Flash onto the iPhone, and it would fix all those QuickTime movies with Flash tracks that Apple broke with the QuickTime 7.3.1 update!
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About One More Thing

  • At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News.com's Tom Krazit will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies strike back against the iPhone, and chipmakers try to figure out how to move past PCs and slip into a little something more comfortable.
    Email Tom at Tom.Krazit@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Stuff I'm reading:

Blogroll

Latest blog posts from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

advertisement
Click Here
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: