October 12, 2007 5:24 PM PDT

Red Hat, Novell sued for patent infringement

Suddenly all those discussions about the discordant ways of open-source software and patent law have become a lot less abstract.

Companies called IP Innovation and Technology Licensing Corporation sued Red Hat and Novell on Tuesday, claiming the top Linux sellers' software products infringe U.S. patent 5,072,412, "User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects," and two identically named patents. The suit (PDF), in the U.S. District Court in Eastern Texas, seeks damages and a permanent injunction prohibiting any further infringement.

Red Hat spokeswoman Leigh Day said Friday only that the company is aware of the suit and "will review the situation." Novell spokesman Bruce Lowry said the company is assessing the suit and that "it's too early to tell, tactically, whether it makes sense for us and Red Hat to join forces."

But as with another recent case, the Software Freedom Law Center's copyright infringement suit against Monsoon Multimedia, which takes the offensive in enforcing free and open-source programming interests, the ripples will likely travel well beyond this particular case.

"Although I and many attorneys in the open-source industry have long been concerned about patent challenges to open-source companies, this case appears to be the first by patent trolls against an open-source licensor," said Mark Radcliffe, a DLA Piper intellectual property attorney who has long been involved in open-source legal matters, on his blog. IP Innovation is a subsidiary of Acacia Technologies, according to a company filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Acacia has licensed patents to a wide variety of companies, including Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Samsung, Exxon, J.C. Penney, the Walt Disney Co., Wendy's, Revlon, Orbitz, General Electric and 3M, according to the company. It had revenue of $46.8 million from the third quarter of 2006 through the second quarter of 2007.

Buying a license to a patent is often the quickest way to make such lawsuits go away, and companies often do so because it can be cheaper than a multimillion-dollar, drawn-out suit that occupies many employees' hours. But licensing a patent isn't such a simple matter when it comes to open-source software.

For example, a company that distributes a program such as the Linux kernel under the General Public License (GPL) isn't permitted to do so if it doesn't grant all recipients of the software the rights it has.

And in general, the patent system is somewhat at odds with open-source software in general. The former grants a limited-term monopoly to an inventor, but the latter involves unencumbered sharing of technology.

One obvious aggressor is Microsoft. Chief Executive Steve Ballmer declared in May that Linux and other open-source projects infringe 235 Microsoft patents. And according to a BetaNews transcript of another speech this week in England, Ballmer said more recently, "People (who) use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense have an obligation to eventually to compensate us."

Red Hat offers a warranty in which it promises to replace any code found to infringe others' intellectual property, and both it and Novell offer customers legal protections. They have deeper pockets than most open-source companies, but they are by no means the only distributors of Linux-based products.

Groklaw, a site that monitors open-source legal actions and helped bring the new suit to light, predicted the suit would be a fitting sequel to The SCO Group's long-running but faltering Linux-related cases against IBM, Novell and others. "I think SCO II has arrived," said Groklaw founder Pamela Jones in a posting Thursday evening.

Jones pounced on two Microsoft connections, both also on Acacia's Web site: Brad Brunell joined the company this month as senior vice president after 16 years at Microsoft, including general manager of intellectual property licensing, and Jonathan Taub, who joined in July as vice president after leaving Microsoft as director of strategic alliances for the company's mobile and embedded devices division.

Recent posts from Underexposed
Red Hat lives on the edge with Fedora 9
Firefox add-on infected with Trojan remnant
Linux video project evades DMCA, back on Google Code
Google: Unicode conquers ASCII on the Web
Google yanks open-source project after copyright complaint
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 60 comments (Page 1 of 3)
Make my day!
by WJeansonne October 12, 2007 8:17 PM PDT
So much for having a cavalier attitude and sticking your head in the sand of over intellectual property rights. As they say in Texas, that'll learn em'!
Reply to this comment View reply
PJ's paranoid obssesion with Microsoft is over the top
by WJeansonne October 12, 2007 8:39 PM PDT
That woman is ridiculous!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Could be interesting
by Vegaman_Dan October 12, 2007 9:42 PM PDT
This could really help Linux prove that it is ready for the real world- ie business. If it can toss away the shackles of uncertainty and support that is the bain of the opensource existance and offer a rock solid solution that consumers don't have to worry about being sued for using, then they can make a good jump ahead in their industry. I wish them well to finally settle things one way or another. Open-source is a cool thing, but the very same things that make it so neat and cool are what make it dangerous for businesses to use. They can't take the chance to invest heavily into a product that may get yanked out from under them due to legal issues later.
Reply to this comment View reply
More trivial patents
by otheus October 13, 2007 1:15 AM PDT
Another case for patent reform. Kudos to "inventors" Henderson, Card, and Maxwell for devising a data schema that allows each virtual desktop to use the same Desktop icons. Woo. This patent was filed in 1987 and granted in 1991. Strangely, it has appeared in variants of X-Windows since at least 1989, when I first started using this "invention". I think there was more work put into filing the patent than in the underlying innovation. I wonder how often that is the case.
Reply to this comment View reply
Just Another Form of Extortion
by Dr. StrangeOne October 13, 2007 1:44 AM PDT
This is no different then say the MOB insisting you need to take out an insurance policy (protection) with them in order to conduct business. Only difference is one side uses thugs and the other lawyers.
Reply to this comment View reply
Isn't this patent expired or near expiration?
by TC110 October 13, 2007 4:36 AM PDT
Patents generally expire after 20 years from the application date. Since this patent was filed on March 25, 1987 one would expect that it would have expired March 25, 2007 or if they use the older 17 year rule from issue date then this patent expires next year, December 10, 2008.
Reply to this comment
Tete-a-tete!
by Commander_Spock October 13, 2007 5:03 AM PDT
"Red Hat, Novell sued for patent infringement"... Wow! Told you so Sergeant: The Trees Are Moving - It must be those 800lb Gorillas (OS/2 Warp/eComStation) having their (read the subject line). It must be time for the "Desktop" hunting expeditions to begin!
Reply to this comment
patents
by sportcatz October 13, 2007 7:07 AM PDT
Tenchnogreed hath no boundaries.
Reply to this comment
better question why is microsoft behind PATENT FAIRNESS COALITION?
by digitalshaman October 13, 2007 7:25 AM PDT
if the coalition for patent fairness truly wants to improve the quality of patents, why didn't they go through negotiations instead of resorting to litigation? hmmm...
Reply to this comment View reply
Legal equivalent of Usenet trolls
by Bubulus October 13, 2007 10:37 AM PDT
This is just another example of losers attempting to pervert the legal system to extort money from successful innovators. Hopefully they will meet the same fate as USL and SCO. The whole notion of patenting software has been controversial. The copyright system is probably more appropriate.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
  • About Underexposed

  • This blog sheds light on digital photography, science and open-source software--Stephen Shankland's eclectic beat. Shankland joined CNET News.com in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico, and graduated from Harvard.

    Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Stuff I'm reading:

Latest blog posts from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

Resource center from News.com sponsors

advertisement
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: