April 21, 2008 3:33 PM PDT

Hardy Heron reflects Ubuntu Linux ambitions

Correction 8 p.m. PT: I included the wrong duration for regular Ubuntu releases. It's 18 months.

Canonical plans to release Hardy Heron, its newest version of Ubuntu Linux on Thursday, and Chief Executive Mark Shuttleworth isn't being shy and retiring about it.

"This is our most significant release ever," he said in an interview.

Ordinarily I avoid publishing such marketing superlatives, but Shuttleworth is right. Hardy Heron, also called version 8.04 for its April 2008 launch date, is Canonical's proof-in-the-pudding moment that will show whether the company can grow beyond its subsidized roots into a self-sustaining business. Ubuntu has a strong following among Linux enthusiasts, but it's Red Hat and Novell that still dominate the commercial Linux market.

The reason so much weight rests on the skinny legs of Hardy Heron is because it's only the second Linux product from the company to come with long-term support. The first LTS version of Ubuntu, Dapper Drake, arrived when the company was still comparatively immature and unknown.

Long-term support means the company releases bug fixes, security patches, and other updates for five years on the server version and three years on the desktop version, time frames more palatable to businesses than the 18-month life spans of other Ubuntu versions.

On the server, the new version has support for KVM virtualization built in and comes in a stripped-down version called JEOS (Just Enough Operating System) for software "appliances" that run on KVM or VMware. The company has been working on better hardware support--though it no longer supports Sun Microsystems' Sparc processors, Shuttleworth said. Also included are better integration with Windows' Active Directory for corporate users and a certified, downloadable version of Java software.

On the desktop, Hardy Heron now can be installed directly into the Windows file system so people can try it without having to reformat their hard drives. The software also deals better with online music and photo sites such as Flickr, he added. However, because of an upgrade timing disconnect, fans of the KDE user interface software will have to make do with only 18-month support for the older KDE 3.5 or an unsupported developer version based on the new KDE 4.0.

Still not profitable
Shuttleworth, who funded Ubuntu with wealth from his sale of an earlier start-up to VeriSign, cares about business success, but he's also willing to continue spending to help Canonical grow into new areas--such as the mobile version that's beginning in earnest with Hardy Heron.

"Ubuntu will require continuing investment from me and from others. We are on a trajectory that will make the company sustainable," Shuttleworth said. But he wouldn't say when he envisions profitability: "I'd rather not be on the hook...I keep finding additional areas to invest in."

What's a surprise to Shuttleworth, though, is that the desktop Linux is financially more significant than the version for servers.

"The desktop contributes more to Canonical's bottom line than the server," he said. The server business is still Canonical's primary focus for support revenue. But the company has been getting paid for desktop and consumer-electronics work, he said.

"On the desktop, we see strong demand for custom engineering and assurance programs as people look to Canonical to indemnify them against potential copyright or patent issues," Shuttleworth said.

Canonical also works on unbranded Linux for consumer-electronics companies, though Shuttleworth expects they'll eventually opt for something like Ubuntu. "The hardware vendors are leaping at the ability to do their own operating system. I believe over time they'll tire of the costs and risks of doing that," he said.

Regarding engineering work, he added that Canonical has a tight partnership with Intel, an "extensive on-site engineering relationship where we integrate support for latest platforms."

Recent posts from Underexposed
Red Hat lives on the edge with Fedora 9
Firefox add-on infected with Trojan remnant
Linux video project evades DMCA, back on Google Code
Google: Unicode conquers ASCII on the Web
Google yanks open-source project after copyright complaint
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 19 comments (Page 1 of 1)
the 18-year life spans of other...MONTHS!
by gsekse April 21, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
I think you mean months... Now Microsoft... it might need to support XP for 18 years... I dunno... 8)
Reply to this comment
Typo
by shaft350x April 21, 2008 4:16 PM PDT
18-year life span? I think he means 18 month.
Reply to this comment
Could you have the time wrong?
by Steve Charles April 21, 2008 4:18 PM PDT
Is it possible that the normal support period is 18 months for interim releases of the Ubuntu family and not 18 year-life spans? Regards Steve SBClist.com
Reply to this comment View reply
Ubuntu is its own worse enemy
by The_Decider April 21, 2008 7:51 PM PDT
It is always lagging behind the vastly superior openSuSe, in terms of hardware support and software. openSuSE 10.3 had built in support for KDE4 before it was released. The 6 months release schedule is the reason for all these problems. They release every 6 months, come hell or high water, and that is exactly what happens. Ubuntu..100% hype, 0% substance. It is hurting Linux far more than it is helping. for those curious about Ubuntu, try openSUSE 10.3, it is several years ahead of Ubuntu. Yes, Ubuntu is better than XP or Vista, but what isn't?
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
Buying a Dell with Hardy soon :)
by ethana2 April 22, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
Inspiron, 1440 x 900 LCD, nVidia GeForce Go 1 GB of RAM, 1.6 GHz C2D, built in webcam, dual mic, 120 GB SATA HDD..... $800 I think I'm going to order some of those stickers you know, to put the logo on the back of the screen and such.. Heh, almost makes me feel like a mac user... ....but not quite ;)
Reply to this comment View reply
OpenSuse=garbage
by ferretboy88 April 22, 2008 6:16 PM PDT
Ubuntu is way easier to use. Most people don't want to waste an entire day figuring stuff out. After I paid $50 for a Suse 10.1 box set and found nothing in the box except a disk and a 10 page manual I was not fond of Suse. I thought I would give the company some money and all I received in return was a book that was useless.
Reply to this comment
Looking forward.
by Imalittleteapot April 22, 2008 10:58 PM PDT
I've been looking forward to the release. Actually I've really only been looking forward to KDE 4 unsupported version to experiment, but I'm going to try Fedora 9 eventually anyway. Fun fun hopefully. As for Ubuntu ambitions I think Linux has problems narrowed down to two or three major things. Those are power management (hibernate, shutdown, and sleep) and wireless cards. Power management works like a charm on my system, but that's a system specifically chosen to be a Linux system. It is also a desktop that looks like it weighs more than I do. I didn't feel the need for a wireless card. However, those seem to be the two major complaints on the message boards. Both caused by hardware makers not supporting Linux, and Windows isn't perfect either in these regards. Here's an idea. Correct me if I'm wrong. There may already be a site like this. Linux has hardware compatibility lists, but when I'm searching out a computer I might know it has a wireless card, but I don't know which wireless card. I won't be able to check the HCL until I've already bought it. Is there a wiki somewhere that could track the whole model number of a PC? I could just go to a site and see if the new Dell Inspiron was fully, partially, or not compatible with Linux instead of the individual parts. It could also list which customs configurations work. Like if I had an HP I could test Linux on it, and report my results. The last problem is, installing apps on a system that isn't Internet connected. I can't apt-get anything that way. You can make your own offline software repo, but it wasn't very intuitive last time I looked. Apt could package an app with all its dependencies (both from the repo, and what was already installed) into a single compressed file with a single command. Apt-get ?package appname packagename or whatever. Then I can copy that file over to the machine without Internet, and just apt-get -fromfile appname.pkg or whatever. If there was a conflict I would just get an error on install letting me know what is wrong. Like in Windows when the setup file doesn't ship with the needed version of Java or whatever. Some packages apt would assume are already on the target machine so the file isn't as big. However, you could choose to package them anyway if needed. Almost the same thing as a local repo, but way easier. Might work, might not. Don?t know. Just a thought.
Reply to this comment
Ubuntu comes of age
by desmondhaynes April 24, 2008 10:13 AM PDT
Cool features! Have been waiting for this release. Installation in progress! -TW http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/04/ubuntu-hardy-heron-8-04-2/
Reply to this comment
Am I the last Fedora user left?
by djacobow1 April 25, 2008 12:40 PM PDT
I've been installing the new Fedora releases for years. Is anyone else still using these? Drivers are sometimes a hassle, but overall I've never had a huge problem with it. (once you find livna for all the non-free A/V stuff). Since I switched from Slackware before that, I haven't even looked at the distros. What's compelling enough to justify a switch? (seriously curious)
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About Underexposed

  • This blog sheds light on digital photography, science and open-source software--Stephen Shankland's eclectic beat. Shankland joined CNET News.com in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico, and graduated from Harvard.

    Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Stuff I'm reading:

Latest blog posts from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

Resource center from News.com sponsors

advertisement
On CHOW: What do gamers like to eat?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: