April 30, 2008 6:27 PM PDT

Adobe toys with standardizing DNG raw photo format

Adobe Systems is discussing potential standardization of its Digital Negative (DNG) format for digital images, a company executive has said.

Most people are fine with plain-old JPEG for their images, but higher-end cameras can produce more flexible and higher-quality "raw" photos that are encoded with camera makers' proprietary formats. Because different cameras produce different formats, companies such as Adobe whose software deals with raw files face a daunting engineering challenge understanding.

DNG is designed as an alternative to the profusion--what Adobe calls a Tower of Babel--but it hasn't caught on widely. Ricoh, Casio, Pentax, and a few other camera makers sell cameras that can record DNG files, but the two heavyweights, Nikon and Canon, along with Olympus and Sony, so far have given it the cold shoulder.

Maybe that will change if Adobe can get DNG standardized. The company has submitted DNG to the International Standards Organization for it to consider, said Kevin Connor, Adobe's senior director, professional digital imaging, in an interview with Digital Photo Pro.

He wouldn't promise anything, though.

"It's sort of premature to speculate whether a formal standard will come out of that or not," Connor said. Standardization "can take a long time, with many parties involved and different viewpoints. The good thing is that there's a discussion happening."

Standards have several advantages over in-house technology, whether proprietary like most raw formats or well documented and freely shared like DNG. Having them under control of a neutral standards body can give confidence that multiple companies can have a say in a standard's future, for example.

There are disadvantages, too. Standards typically are slow to be approved and slow to change..

Separately, Adobe said it plans to release a DNG codec for Windows to let it display thumbnails. Doing so requires installation of Microsoft's Windows Imaging Component (WIC), which is a free download but also built into Windows Vista and XP SP3.

Recent posts from Underexposed
Red Hat lives on the edge with Fedora 9
Firefox add-on infected with Trojan remnant
Linux video project evades DMCA, back on Google Code
Google: Unicode conquers ASCII on the Web
Google yanks open-source project after copyright complaint
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 5 comments (Page 1 of 1)
DNG
by ewelch April 30, 2008 8:16 PM PDT
The author mentions some minor camera companies that support DNG, but they neglect two heavyweights - Hasselblad and Leica - two pioneers from decades ago who have seen the light. Nikon and Canon (Sony is not in the same league) don't support it because it allows them to force photographers to consider using their own slow, buggy, under-featured software rather than industry standards like Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture. They need to wake up and let photographers own their images and not be dependent on their good graces to continue to support older versions of their RAW files for as long as they live. There are already versions of digital files that are no longer supported by any software. This could become a major problem. Aperture now supports DNG. Obviously Lightroom and Photoshop always have. People who don't have the latest version of Photoshop can benefit from the DNG converter since it's likely to support their cameras and can convert their files to DNG before support is added to Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture.
Reply to this comment View reply
Let them standardize
by Jens Peermann May 1, 2008 8:33 AM PDT
Personally I like the idea. In a world that has relied on standardizing for decades it seems rather retro for camera manufacturers to keep creating their own little electronic fiefdoms. Why are they doing that anyway? Are they hoping that their little piece of software will become the world standard some day, showering them with licensing fees? A world standard will come, eventually. And I'd rather have one that is developed by a software company instead of a camera company. Just as I prefer to buy cameras from camera companies instead of software companies.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About Underexposed

  • This blog sheds light on digital photography, science and open-source software--Stephen Shankland's eclectic beat. Shankland joined CNET News.com in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, New Mexico, and graduated from Harvard.

    Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Stuff I'm reading:

Latest blog posts from News.com

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried A look at how technology is changing our lives and at the people behind all that life-changing stuff.

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper Charles Cooper weighs in on Silicon Valley hijinks, and he doesn't suffer fools gladly.

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi Covering the latest in computer viruses and computer crime.

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman At the tech culture nexus of video games, fire art, and virtual worlds.

Green Tech Fresh green tech news and commentary.

One More Thing by Tom Krazit Tom Krazit takes on the tech phenomenon that is Apple, and keeps a close watch on the chip industry.

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber When business and technology meet, that's when things get interesting.

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh Exploring the intersection of politics and technology.

The Social by Caroline McCarthy Exploring all facets of social media and tech culture.

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland Coverage of digital photography, science, and open-source software.

Resource center from News.com sponsors

advertisement
Click Here
On CHOW: Does drinking ice water burn calories?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: