April 7, 2008 9:28 PM PDT

Web 2.5: The emergence of platforms-as-a-service

On the road to the elusive Web 3.0 (something to do with semantics, meaning, and context rather than just data, links, and AJAX), core infrastructure is beginning to move from the edge to a center inhabited by companies such as Amazon, Salesforce.com, Joyent, and now Google with its new App Engine.

Call it Web 2.5, where the platform-as-a-service providers allow developers to create Web applications via the cloud and for users to consume them on any Web-connected device, anytime and anywhere. It eliminates what Amazon's Jeff Bezos describes as the "muck," the undifferentiated heavy lifting, such as setting up and maintaining servers, databases, storage, and networks.

It also leverages data centers from large players like Amazon and Google that were built from the ground up to support Web applications at huge, virtualized scale and with high reliability and relatively low cost. And, it creates potentially giant subscription-based revenue streams for the platform-as-a-service providers. They become utilities providing Web services to the planet and managing the high-value personal profile data.

Google App Engine, which was unveiled tonight at Google's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, offers similar capabilities to Amazon's EC2, S3, and SimpleDB services. Google App Engine is limited to using the Python language, Google APIs, and a relatively modest amount of storage, compute cycles, and bandwidth per day currently, but you can see where this is heading.

Google could parlay its search and advertising technology, market dominance, and its infrastructure prowess into a powerful engine that runs and monetizes thousands or millions of externally developed applications.

Salesforce.com provides a more mature example today with its Force.com platform. It allows developers to write applications, mostly CRM-oriented, in a variety of languages that can run natively on the Salesforce.com software platform and data centers.

(Credit: salesforce.com)

In many ways it is the Microsoft model--you need a subscription (license in the old days) to the platform to run your application. In this case, "run" means that Salesforce.com provides developers all the software and hardware services in exchange for a fee, which is based on specific metrics, such as Web services calls.

Rival NetSuite, as well as smaller outfits such as Bungee Labs, are seizing on the concept of providing complete cloud-based development and deployment platform services.

Microsoft hasn't yet shown its cards in the platform-as-a-service arena. Nor has the object of its affection, Yahoo. Microsoft has talked about SQL Server Data Services and the grand synchronization mesh, but it hasn't revealed any plans for an end-to-end hosted platform-as-a-service for developing and serving applications from the cloud. Mary Jo Foley has some insight on that topic.

Web 3.0 as envisioned by Tim Berners-Lee is not around the corner, but it is busily percolating. In parallel, platform-as-a-service is evolving, the plateau of Web 2.5. When the two meet, Web 3.0 will have arrived.

Recent posts from Outside the Lines
Deconstructing Wikipedia at the Berkman Center
The Internet thrives on dark energy
Comcast goes social with Plaxo acquisition
Marc Andreessen dings Google's Friend Connect
Google Friend Connect: The movie
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 11 comments (Page 1 of 2)
by kool_skatkat April 8, 2008 1:59 AM PDT
What happens when somebody switches off the network? Will the clouds melt and rain down for living the users desperate, in natural disaster proportion? The cloud and the network owners will be kings and queens.
Reply to this comment
by bijiny April 8, 2008 5:35 AM PDT
Google's App Engine + Opensocial = Web 3.0 ?
Reply to this comment
by dfarber April 8, 2008 6:16 AM PDT
App Engine + Open Social....gets you to a socially aware applications faster....but not to the Web of meaning on a grand scale...
Reply to this comment
by thursdayagain April 8, 2008 6:46 AM PDT
Rather than "semantics, meaning, and context" I'd suggest "the semantics OF meaning IN context". Just a thought.
Reply to this comment
by hutchike April 8, 2008 6:46 AM PDT
There's a new breed of companies that provide layers on top of the platform-as-a-service, for example www.rapidscale.com - this is a very interesting development too.
Reply to this comment
by dfarber April 8, 2008 7:21 AM PDT
Like that...
Reply to this comment
by jerimorris2000 April 8, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
Ah, everything old becomes new again.... Waay back when I started in high tech, "Platform as a Service" was called a "mainframe" or a "time share system."
Reply to this comment
by EmmaZummie April 8, 2008 8:26 AM PDT
And I thought I was the only one left who remembered those days! Next thing you know they will start offering 'dumb terminals' which only interface with an image on the host system!
Reply to this comment
by rktectRich April 8, 2008 4:58 PM PDT
All of these initiatives are very innovative and changing the landscape in interesting ways. I must say buzz words these days are so commonly misused - such as this title. This technology in no way moves us further ahead from "Web 2.0" as it in no way affects content or capabilities delivered to end-users through websites. If you want to apply versioning numbers, this is more along the lines of Hosting 2.0 or Development Methodologies 2.0. These so-called "clouds" (another very misused term) are simply changing hosting platforms from traditional services and setups. Also, these new platforms each require their own specific development environments, languages and proprietary (or open) scripting to work. Hence, Development Methodologies 2.0 - but honestly - not even... its just development for a new target environment. As well, something you write for Google's App Engine will not work in Amazon's environment for example. In the end, these just offer a different way to build things - they don't help us innovate functionality or evolve the Web to the next level. Anything beyond Web 2.0 is supposed to offer data structures and contextual integration way beyond today's; opening NEW possibilities and intelligent processing capabilities.
Reply to this comment
by In-Cyde April 8, 2008 5:47 PM PDT
Web 3.0 won't be web-semantics. As web-semantics is a completely flawed concept. The AI junkies want to create a chick to play with like in Weird Science. They fail to understand that context and infliction have more to do with the meaning of words then what some RDF matrix can define with billions of hours of work. -Ben
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About Outside the Lines

  • Dan Farber is the editor in chief of CNET News. He has covered technology for more than two decades, and previously served as editor in chief of ZDNet, PCWeek and Macweek. Outside the Lines explores the intersection of business and technology.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. CBS to buy CNET Networks

  2. Intel Germany executive reportedly confirms Atom-based iPhone

  3. Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop

  4. Xbox 360 hits 10 million sold in U.S.

  5. Photos: Microsoft previews 2008 Xbox games

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

Resource center from News.com sponsors

advertisement
On MovieTome: Your first look at the new JAMES BOND
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: