• On MovieTome: TRANSFORMERS 2 SPOILERS!
October 10, 2008 10:55 AM PDT

Why a new $800 Apple laptop had better be pretty

Posted by Chris Matyszczyk
  • Font size
  • Print

There is something vaguely timber-shivering about every new Apple announcement. Especially for those Isaac Newtons whose head didn't just absorb the apple's bump, but the whole fruit, core and all.

The latest and most exciting rumor is that Cupertino's finest will, in a beautifully timed nod at the fact that most people have very little cash and even less credit, launch an $800 laptop.

This might cause certain elements at Dell and HP to scuttle off to the nearest executive restroom. Although perhaps the most surprising thing is that they would be surprised.

Of course there are those who fear that Apple might suddenly debase its image by pandering to the masses. But just as Target got into design to raise its brand image above the mass of the masses, Mercedes decided to stoop (but not really) into the runaround arena, by getting into Smart cars, A-Class cars. These were products people liked and then appreciated, regardless of their price.

Big Apple, Little Apple--they can all be pretty.

(Credit: CC ShielNiak)

It's not about moving below or above your price point. It's about how you do it.

Appearing at a price point at which you've rarely been seen before (yes, there's Mac Mini, but I think we're talking laptops here) isn't going to suddenly devalue your brand. What is important is not that Apple might launch an $800 laptop, but whether the little thing will be cute.

Apple strokes people's feely bits like few other brands in the world.

And its brand has arguably never been stronger than it is today. No other laptop manufacturer has ever really successfully competed with Apple on design.

Please don't be cross with me, but it seems like every other laptop around looks like the portable equivalent of most General Motors' automobiles. Circa 1992.

So with no real threat at the core of its brand, Apple can tiptoe through its competitors' tulips and check out the undersoil.

I imagine an $800 Apple laptop may have fewer of those function thingies that the more refined devotee might enjoy. Perhaps not. But those who want to pay $800 for an Apple laptop may well be happy with a little less ringing and whistling. Many won't even hear the silence.

Especially given that most of them know that Apple products function in a simple, engaging and human way. That, plus looks, is the real definition of great design.

What is vital, though, to much of the target is Arm Candy Quality: what the new laptop will look like, how it will feel you're using it, and what it will be like to be seen with. Yes, that may sound frustrating for those who regard a laptop's capabilities as the tech equivalent of the Ultimate Fighting Championship.

But if Apple gets the feely parts right (and who can imagine it won't?) then the laundry bills around Austin, Texas, and other centers of laptop manufacture might just rise quite considerably.

Chris Matyszczyk is an award-winning creative director who advises major corporations on content creation and marketing. He brings an irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice to the tech world. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Recent posts from Technically Incorrect
What Facebook should have learned from religion
'Tetris' can wipe out your traumas
Why Wall Street has no faith in Steve Jobs
Twitter's celebrity hack: The unanswered question
Think yourself fat to save the planet
Six sure things for 2009
Hey, Facebook, what have you got against breast-feeding?
Celebrities are not very bright, suggest scientists
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 24 comments
by Galaxy5 October 10, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
Sure would be cool if they sold a product that could be used as a laptop or a desktop, a la Mac Mini. $600.00 for the 'brick' and you get what's essentially a Mac Mini. $800 gets you the same thing with a bright, sharp, fully detachable 13" display.

Not that I would be in a position to know...I just like leaving cryptic comments. And I drink beer at B.J.s on DeAnza a lot.
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee October 10, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
But what about the competitors? They have gotten fairly good at design and aesthetics and they are really good at pricing their products. I can get a notebook from Dell or HP with specs of the most high end MacBook for $600 to $800. As soon Apple delivers this product, don't be surprised to see $300 to $500 notebooks from Dell, HP, Lenovo or Acer. Then we can say, the cycle continues. Apple will have to use its design, user experience and end to end value to really make this an easy sell.
Reply to this comment
by technewsjunkie October 11, 2008 8:52 AM PDT
" I can get a notebook from Dell or HP with specs of the most high end MacBook for $600 to $800."

Please provide a link to this. I would like to see it. Especially the display.

Thank you .
by Penguinisto October 11, 2008 5:26 PM PDT
Well, Dell and HP already operate on razor-thin margins... plus they have to pay Microsoft for the privilege of selling those laptops with Windows pre-loaded on them. Not sure how on Earth they're going to be able to shrink their existing prices without having to cut even more corners (read: more gray-market parts, under-specced RAM and mainboard components, overclocked video components, HDD's with undersized buffer, etc). Sure, the numbers on the surface will look pretty, but I suspect that now more than ever, the numbers that consumers don't pay attention to (e.g. CAS latency on RAM) will suck even more than they do now...

/P
by jasonschlachter October 10, 2008 12:14 PM PDT
you might see an dual core atom powered laptop for $800 from Apple. Perfectly usable by most students and cloud computing types.
Reply to this comment
by wratbatblue October 10, 2008 12:22 PM PDT
I couldn't resist the chance to speak up as one who disagrees with the statement that Apple always gets the "pretty" part right. I think they do extremely well with their desktops and handhelds, but I, personally, don't think their laptops are pretty at all, with the possible exception of the black Macbook. They're too minimalist for my taste.
Reply to this comment
by technewsjunkie October 11, 2008 8:56 AM PDT
Yeah, I much prefer the WinTel "luggable" laptops I see. They are not "minimalist" at all, they are deep, fat and heavy.
by bgnm October 10, 2008 12:48 PM PDT
As usual, the industry pundits have it backwards. Apple makes products that work extremely well and that also happen to look great, not the other way around. My Mac is worth large price premium because of frustration I don't have to suffer. For example, I logged onto a free WiFi service at an airport Tuesday, and checked email and the market within a minute or two. The Windows geeks across from me were not able to get logged on in the 45 minutes before the flight boarded. They were obviously not novices, and they were obviously very frustrated. I'm always amused at the little things the Windows platform designers never seem to get right, e.g. USB ports too close together to be used simultaneously. My MacBook looks (and performs) like a Porshe. By contrast, HP laptops always remind me of the station wagon in the original Vacation movie. Lots of chrome, but not much more.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 10, 2008 2:46 PM PDT
Oh, please don't get me wrong, bgnm.

I agree that Apple makes really good products. For me, at least. I have never used anything else. Not sure that I could. But I'm still drawn to them first for the looks. And then for the other 'feely' things, like ease of use.

Chris
by rapier1 October 10, 2008 7:40 PM PDT
Ummm... DHCP is pretty fundamental technology and in most situations it just works. Unless they were trying to access VPN through a poorly configured router there should have been no problem. So I have to believe that these 'geeks' were trying to do something more than just send out a DHCP request and that you just weren't aware of what they were trying to do.
by Penguinisto October 10, 2008 1:02 PM PDT
@ the author: Screw the looks - question is, what will it have under the hood? I can live with a 13-inch screen for $800, but as long as they don't skimp too much on the CPU (a decent Core2 Duo or Centrino Duo will do), a decent OpenGL-capable video card (GeForce-something with 128/256MB on it), and allow the buyer to jam in a few sticks of RAM and perhaps stick in a bigger HDD (SATA will do just fine, thanks)... all is well.

I can always get a bigger monitor to plug the creature into @ home (same w/ the keyboard and etc), and looks are the last thing I care about (I own and use a very banged-up Sony Vaio Centrino rig).

If it has some decent 'oomph under the hood (with potential for the user to pack in more), I'd happily run out and grab one.

/P
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 10, 2008 2:48 PM PDT
And there is plenty of room in this world for the UnderTheHooders, penguinisto.

It's just that some folks out there don't look at things quite like you do. I mean, CPUs, RAMs...Lordy, Lordy, you are deep, man.

It's all good.

Chris

Chris
by rapier1 October 10, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
Chris, thats a really weird reply. Pretty means nothing if the product doesn't meet the basic needs of the users. We're talking about computers here - not fashion accessories. As far as the design goes - apple is good on the edges but the fundamentals of the ID are consistent throughout the problem space. A notebook needs to conform to a basic set of tasks and this dictates the major modalities of the design. The remainder is frill. It speaks to some people - but if the core components aren't there then the frill adds nothing.
by Penguinisto October 11, 2008 8:54 AM PDT
@ Chris: Dude - form has its place, but not at the expense of function.

The only gripe I've had against the low-end Apple notebooks are that they tend to have mediocre parts when compared to their more powerful siblings, and that the scale of mediocrity is on a curve. The Mac Mini doesn't suffer that problem. The Minis come with decent hardware that provides a decent bang-for-buck value (though it's a bit of a trial to bump the specs after you bring it home).

Now with a laptop, I don't expect to hop it up like I did my old G4 Mac Cube (where I basically gutted and customized pretty much everything but the logic board). OTOH, I do want something I can reasonably expect to bring up to speed in a small form factor.

I guess what I'm saying is, looks aren't my top priority when it comes to shelling out for a computer. I'll leave that to the folks who, say, happily drop $50 or so extra just to have their Dell arrive in some "custom" color. ;)

/P
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 11, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
Of course not at the expense of function...but design isn't just the sheer cosmetic look. It's what your eyes recognize as an invitation to use, understand and explore without intimidation or confusion.

Macs always seem to function well enough to me...

Chris
by Kalama October 10, 2008 3:59 PM PDT
" bgnm " says something very straight forward .... years ago when I was involved in getting my internet connection set up for my business, the tech guy was here, WinPC in hand, trying to "hook up" to the connection .... before he could reboot, my old "Blue Clam Shell" was on line and I was surfing the net ... Hum? I still use that old unit when ever I need to program a router for off site use. << 15 employees - VPN to office >>
Reply to this comment
by navanee2u October 11, 2008 1:07 AM PDT
This is going to be a new kind of "notebook" from Apple... Almost like a real school "notebook".

Check out these predictions:
http://navanee.wordpress.com/2008/10/09/14-predictions-for-apple-oct-14-product-launch/
Reply to this comment
by ssicomputers October 11, 2008 8:31 AM PDT
Personally, I think the real question will be:

When (if) Apple does come out with this $800 Macbook, are they going to be ready for the new customers in the sub-$1000 market they've never had to deal with before?

"Why doesn't Deer Hunter run on my new Mac?"
"What do you mean I can't use this 5-year old printer?"
"What the hell is Finder?"

Apple's forte' is Mac users, and those folks who are willing to take the time to know their Mac that they are able to afford and spend the time getting to know.

I'm just curious to see if this will open up to another MobileMe situation.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 11, 2008 9:00 AM PDT
@ssicomputers:

* Deer Hunter (*chuckle*) can run on a new Mac - just get Parallels, and you're set.
* five-year-old printers are not a problem with OSX (my Mac has an ancient HP DeskJet 940c latched onto it - no drivers needed).
* Finder = "Windows Explorer", but better. No more "right-click on My Computer", but instead you get "double click on the square smiling face thingy"

I know what you;re getting at, but seriously? It's pretty easy to get the hang of a Mac.

Trust me - I've had a wild array of relatives and friends stay at my place, sit down in front of a Macintosh they've never seen before, and in less than 10-15 minutes they were reading web pages, sending email, playing games, etc etc. Most of them summed it up in saying "wow - this is pretty easy to use!" I think my mother took the longest to get the hang of the thing, at 15 minutes total (mostly because she kept asking me about the thing out of curiosity more than for any help).

/P
Reply to this comment
by ssicomputers October 11, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
I hear ya. I just wonder organizationally if Apple's ready for this. It's going to be interesting to watch, regardless.
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 11, 2008 2:55 PM PDT
penguinisto,

I really do think you are so very right. Macs are genuinely intuitive for most normal, ordinary humans. they simple feel less 'scientific.'

Especially for Mums.

Chris
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 11, 2008 10:29 PM PDT
Indeed. The biggest shock I've noticed from folks was best summed up by my missus: Not knowing where to start. OTOH, that's easy to fix... I pointed out the icons for the web browser, email client, etc on the dock, and left the icon leading to Applications on the dock as well... the rest I simply left her at, and in no time she was totally cozy with it. :)
by Stormspace October 12, 2008 7:28 PM PDT
I work in a large organization with a mixed windows.mac, linux environment and I find that macs do great as a peer on a network. It's real easy to connect them and get them going. When you try to do anything with the network, other than surf or print, is when the problems arise. Macs simply don't do networking very well, or intuitively for that matter. But in a consumer market you typically wouldn't see those problems.
Reply to this comment
by twyrick October 13, 2008 2:41 PM PDT
Stormspace, I agree completely. OS X has made a lot of improvements in the area of networking capabilities and compatibility - but much of what we finally got in Leopard should have been there several versions ago. And in some cases, it seems like Apple even broke compatibility that was there in Tiger. (EG. I was trying to connect to an NFS share on my Linux-based MythTV box from OS X and I kept getting "Access denied" type errors trying to work with the files on the NFS share in Leopard, despite the fact that share was set up completely open for full access to all users (anonymous included). In OS X 10.4 Tiger, it worked just fine.) After a few software "point release" updates to Leopard, it started working for me again, but it's this kind of thing that upsets you, when Macs are known for promising that things "just work" with them!
Reply to this comment
 See all 24 Comments >>
advertisement

In the news now

Apple: DRM-free tunes, unibody MacBook Pro

roundup At Macworld, Phil Schiller touts 10 million songs sans DRM, plus 69-cent songs, a unibody 17-inch notebook, iLife updates, and more.


Countdown to CES

special coverage The tech community descends on Las Vegas as the Consumer Electronics Show gets ready to kick off in all its gadgety glory.


About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right