• On TV.com: THE GIRLS NEXT DOOR photos
September 4, 2008 4:14 PM PDT

URC MX-6000: The $1,500 touch-screen universal remote

Posted by Matthew Panton
  • Font size
  • Print

(Credit: Universal Remote Control)

Don't expect to see Universal Remote Control's MX-6000 on the shelf at Circuit City or Best Buy--it's strictly intended as part of a custom solution that a professional installer would set up. Thankfully, the $1,500 touch-screen unit does offer quite a few bells and whistles that take it beyond mainstream consumer remotes such as the $200 Logitech Harmony One.

An update to URC's previous touch-screen model, the MX-3000, the MX-6000 is the company's first wide-screen (480x272) remote. Beyond standard device control (infrared and RF control), the MX-6000 adds Wi-Fi to the mix for access to networked PC home entertainment--according to the company, cover art, artist name, and other metadata will be aggregated from your combined media libraries and displayed on the remote's wide-screen display. It also includes built-in modules that when connected to the Internet can display personalized weather reports, stocks, and news, which can be customized within the remote's interface. Also of interest to digital media fans is the companion PSX-1, a networked iPod dock that the MX-6000 can control--dial up iPod-based music and videos on the remote, and have the content play back on your receiver or HDTV (the PSX-1 has component video output for optimal video quality).

So what do you think: If you had unlimited funds, would you be interested in a $1,500 touch-screen remote? Or is this sort of product overkill, even for the Rolls Royce crowd?

Recent posts from Crave
Ion's bevy of turntables and iPod accessories
Psyko 5.1 headset puts speakers where they've never been before
T-Mobile slide show
Panasonic SC-TZ1: wireless, ultra-slim speaker system
LG BD390 Blu-ray player includes built-in Wi-Fi
Nokia shows off the BH-804 Bluetooth headset
News of home theater tech from LG comes streaming in
Iriver's Wave Home: All-in-one communications/multimedia hub gets some buzz
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 15 comments
by backstorker4736 September 4, 2008 4:43 PM PDT
This is retarded
Reply to this comment
by Afishionado September 4, 2008 5:00 PM PDT
I will install one in my Rolls.
Reply to this comment
by Scott Gardener September 4, 2008 10:18 PM PDT
Given sufficient funds, I'd consider it if it offered enough additional functionality I couldn't get out of a higher end Logitech universal remote, like the Harmony 1000. The main advantage to a universal remote is to simplify functionality rather than add it, so the remote itself should operate intuitively. If I had the funds to build, say, a $20,000 home theater system, then I would consider spending upwards to $2000 on a good remote, if it were the right remote for the job. If I could do the same with a $500 model, with the difference being trivial features, then I'd save the money.

I do have some real world points of comparison. I happen to have recently finished assembling a system worth on the order of about $8000. I spent nothing on the remote, because I was given a Logitech Harmony 880 about three years earlier, and I just had it reprogrammed. But, I did spend $200 to have it reprogrammed for me, a substantial splurge considering that I know how to do it myself. I just did not want to have to put up with hours and hours of troubleshooting, when I work 80 hours a week.

I'm learning from experience that the economics of the well-paid but overworked professional often hinges as much on time as it does money, and that I've found myself willing to spend more on things that work right the first time. I've become a stickler for reliability.

So, I don't consider $1600 unrealistic for a high end universal remote. I just wouldn't expect a lot of people lining up for it like the next iPod, nor would most owners of the thing use it to control the mini TV and boom-box in their bathroom.

I will say that at $1600, it had better be darned good.
Reply to this comment
by jimothyGator September 5, 2008 6:21 AM PDT
I'm with Scott on this one. If I had the funds, I could see myself spending this amount of dough on a remote. That said, I doubt it'd be this particular remote. The unit seems awfully big relative to the size of the screen. While the idea of dedicated volume and challenge buttons is nice, a touch screen remote should be dominated by the screen itself, and the row of buttons below the screen seem unnecessary.

So, I can see how a $1,500 remote isn't unreasonable (though well out of my own budget), I think more work needs to be done.
Reply to this comment
by jakebala September 5, 2008 6:52 AM PDT
personally i bought the harmony one and I love that thing. it is not only beautiful and ergonomic but it works like a dream. (the only downside is what cnet brought up about the non-rf ability of the remote, but that for me is not a big deal)

this remote looks like one of those remotes that u would use for a 75k+ home theater. like the ones u see on tv that people build or get a contractor to build for them for obscene amounts of money (over 100 grand if u know what i mean). As far as using it for the living room to channel surf i don't care for tablets i like the wand remotes. u can use it in 1 hand instead of 2, u point n click just like a normal remote.

really, it is overkill. but like i said if i'm spending upwards of 100 grand on a home theater i'll be buying a 10-20 grand projector and a ridiculous amount on the receiver/pre-amp and amplifier as well as speakers. and after that's all said and done there will definitely be 2% of the budget left for a nice remote.
Reply to this comment
by natedgo September 8, 2008 8:24 AM PDT
I wouldn't install it. That's a pretty low resolution screen. I install crestron touch panels on yachts, and this is a toy compared to whats out there.
Reply to this comment
by Ok_Go September 23, 2008 1:38 PM PDT
You sound like a primadonna programmer who's not looking at the purpose of this remote. The screen resolution is fine relative to the screen size and of course there is better out there, but even Crestron uses URC technology in like the MT-1000c or the ML-600 which are pretty much just rebadged URC remotes that use Crestron programming language. This is a very capable remote at a very competitive price for what it does. Compared to an RTI T4 touchscreen that retails at $2,400(without all of the function of this remote), you could even consider it a deal.
by troyoverton September 8, 2008 9:52 AM PDT
I have the Harmony 1000 touch screen, and unless there is some kind of update, I can't say that I am impressed with it. I wasn't impressed with the touch screen battery life or the button layout. I sometimes have to push the same button several times to get the function to "work."

Like Scott said above... The damned thing MUST work. If I find myself with time to sit and relax and do whatever I do that may necessitate the use of my remote, I don't want to have to reload the settings or spend hours looking for the button or function that I want.

Come to think of it... I should sell it. The only thing that I think is cool about it is that it supports every device that I have, except the xbox360.
Reply to this comment
by SVPHarper December 1, 2008 2:42 PM PST
This remote is excellent for the money. Unlike the ultra expensive Crestron remotes that you would have to pay $1500 just for the programming, this one will do everything anyone needs. It even has 2 way communication with WiFI components and has the ease of use with its own RF system. If you don't need 2 way though, the MX-980 is the way to go plus it has hard buttons which many people like rather than all touch screen.
by xxarcticxx September 8, 2008 10:03 AM PDT
$1,500 and still no blu-tooth for the PS3? No thanks.
Reply to this comment
by SVPHarper December 1, 2008 2:47 PM PST
Blame the idiots at Sony for that one. However, there are now 3rd party USB devices and proprietary IR systems that make the PS3 IR compatible.
by Ben_Bowers September 8, 2008 10:05 AM PDT
I agree with Jake in that the price of this remote should be put into with the costs of other high end home theater components. That being said, for such a hefty fee I would expect additional functionality such as Blue tooth compatibility as well.

The Wi-Fi functionality is intriguing though, especially since it allows the remote to display weather and news. Call me a technophile, but considering the amount of news I consume online, particularly from blogs, the ability to wake up each morning and browse my remote for the latest news while drinking my coffee sounds quite appealing.

Looking at the description though, I don?t see anything about a built in browser, or compatibility with Google reader so perhaps the kindle is still the best option on that front.

Ideally good technology should simplify your life. If this remote and its accessories takes the place of a kindle, harmony one, and ipod video home theater dock, which I estimate totaling up to around $700 bucks then this price seems to be less daunting.

However I?m no expert on the high end home theater remote market and I?m sure there are other options with similar feature sets. My guess is though that people considering this device are less concerned with money than they are about technological wow factor.

Ben Bowers
Contributing Editor for Gear Patrol
www.gearpatrol.com
Reply to this comment
by renGek September 8, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
Does it come with a back massager??

Seriously, if I won the lottery there would still be lots of other things I would spend my money on. I did buy one of the early harmony remotes. For the first 2 months I thought it was great and loved the idea of being able to write my own macros even though at the time $300 seemed obscene for a.....remote controller.

After a few months I starred at the thing and thought "wow what a colossal waste of money that was". Things like weight and battery life made me wondered why I didn't just use the universal remote that came with my tv because after a while I really didn't do much with my tv/stereo beyond changing channels and volume.

There are other toys I rather get first.
Reply to this comment
by SVPHarper December 1, 2008 2:45 PM PST
Oh and the Harmony Logitech remotes are only useful for the simplest systems. Their programming lacks the ability to do real custom programming for multiple zones and sophisticated macros.
Reply to this comment
by Philzone57 December 20, 2008 7:12 AM PST
If all you wish to do is change channels, vol, etc... then logitech is a fine product. But one must consider the WAF(wife approval factor). How many of you have a wife/child that cant use your entertainment system? My daughter has a "kate" button on my mx series remote. When pressed, the remote turns on the tv, cable box. Then switches the tv to vid5, and puts the cable box on channel 45. Viola! Cartoons. Quite a useful function at 8am on a sunday morning when I need sleep. By the way, upon completion of that macro, the remote switches to a profile that merges tv/cable remotes, to eliminate the need to switch between tv and cable controls. In other words, vol operates tv, channel up/down operates cable box. Guide, picture mode, etc... operate respective devices.
My son has an "xbox!" button. This turns on tv, avr507, and xbox360. Puts tv on vid6, 507 to a preset that puts vol at -35db, 360 as source, proper surround mode, etc. Mutes the tv, then goes to a hybrid profile that controls the tv's video options, all 360 options, and gives full audio control to the 507.
I have macros and hybrid profiles setup for all situations(in my home). This allows my family to use my system without my assistance. I could never go back to "remote hell". Which is 12 remotes on my table(2 of which were universal). 1 TRULY programmable remote takes the place of ALL, with no loss of function. In fact, I have found commands that did not exist on my factory remotes. Such as on and off commands for all devices. Discreet video inputs(vid1, 2, etc), as opposed to a tv/video button, and many others. ALL of my factory remotes have the batteries removed, and are stashed away in a closet. I have not used any of them for years now.
That all being said, I am not a computer programmer, or some crazy tech genius. I am a construction worker from Buffalo, NY.
I believe a remote can be worth $1500. It is a small price to pay for tranquility at home, and sleeping in on Sunday.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

In the news now

Yahoo's Decker strong contender for CEO

Sources say the president of the embattled Internet search pioneer has been through two rounds of interviews with the board.


Gadget extravaganza in Las Vegas

CES 2009 is in full swing. Highlights so far include Palm's WebOS and Pre device, Microsoft's Windows 7 beta, and much more.


advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
-->