• On MovieTome: Megan Fox on TRANSFORMERS 2!
July 24, 2008 4:45 PM PDT

Cancer doc urges cell phone precaution

A prominent cancer researcher's warning to limit cell phone use has rekindled anew the longstanding question over mobile-phone health risks.

The media is abuzz with news of the memo from Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. He sent it to faculty and staff Wednesday, saying, among other things, that children should use cell phones only for emergencies, since their developing organs are the most likely to be sensitive to possible effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields.

Dr. Ronald B. Herberman

Dr. Ronald B. Herberman

(Credit: UPCI)

In his 10-point advisory, Herberman also urges adults to keep phones away from their heads and use speakerphones or wireless headsets.

He suggests that people try to avoid constantly carrying their cell phones on their bodies and also try not to keep the devices nearby at night under the pillow or on a nightstand. He even warns against using cell phones in public places like buses because it exposes others to the phone's electromagnetic fields.

Herberman notes that the precautions have been reviewed by UPCI experts in neuro-oncology, epidemiology, and neurosurgery, as well as the Center for Environmental Oncology.

The tumor immunologist's words are grabbing widespread attention both because of his professional position and because they contradict numerous studies that don't find a link between cancer and cell phone use.

Herberman said his warning was based on early findings from unpublished data (see PDF for more).

"Recently, I have become aware of the growing body of literature linking long-term cell phone use to possible adverse health effects including cancer," he says. "Although the evidence is still controversial, I am convinced that there are sufficient data to warrant issuing an advisory to share some precautionary advice on cell phone use."

For anyone concerned about possible health repercussions of cell phone use, many of Herberman's suggestions are easy enough to implement and minimally disruptive at most. Still, the topic can prove daunting to consumers. My colleague, cell phone guru Kent German, says he usually tells concerned consumers the following:

cell phone logo

"First off, choose a phone with a low SAR (Specific Absorption Rate, a measure of the strength of the magnetic field absorbed by the body rating). CNET lists the SARs for almost all current phones in our radiation charts. Secondly, use a headset or a speakerphone whenever possible in order to maximize the distance between the phone and your body. And lastly, limit cell phone use for very young children."

Kent will be addressing the issue further in his On Call column, out soon, so stay tuned. And please share your thoughts below. How much attention will you pay to Herberman's recommendations?

Leslie Katz, senior editor of CNET's Crave, covers gadgets, games, and most other digital distractions. E-mail Leslie.
Recent posts from Crave
Crooked Fingers, 'Phony Revolutions': Free MP3 of the Day
This week in Crave-land
Crave: There's a Storm a-brewing
Even more Samsung phones clear the FCC
Ubiquitous Netbooks, a cheap Acer, and WiMax cometh: The week in laptops
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 13 comments
by JRG1392 July 24, 2008 6:21 PM PDT
My question is what does that mean for bluetooth??
Reply to this comment
by word123 July 24, 2008 6:45 PM PDT
Australian neurosurgeon V. Khurana also warned about mobile phones (www.brain-surgery.us/mobph.pdf), and he recommends also minimizing bluetooth use.
Reply to this comment View reply
by bgnm July 24, 2008 8:47 PM PDT
Dr. Herberman has provided further evidence of how unscientific the medical profession is. Two facts: 1) not one credible study has shown a correlation between any detrimental effect and cell p hone usage (or any other low level EM field, for that matter); 2) no one has even postulated a credible interaction mechanism between an EM field and the human body that could result in a carcinogenic effect. Thermal deposition is too minute. Thirty years ago, alarmists were warning us that microwave ovens were going to kill us. In the early nineteenth century, it was well known that the human body could not survive traveling at 50 mph. Sounds like Dr. Herberman is creating rationale for a research project. Unfortunately, aided by the scientifically illiterate media, he has created fear and trepidation in the minds of the equally scientifically ignorant masses.
Reply to this comment
by bcarryer July 24, 2008 8:51 PM PDT
Look People...This isn't rocket science nor is it brain surgery. In fact it is pseudo-science. No respectable scientist would make claims based on "unpublished data". Let's see...the maximum energy from cell phone radiation is about 300 GHz. The radiation energy from your average light bulb is about 10 MILLION TIMES this. The intensity of UV rays are about 1 BILLION TIMES this. The radiation energy of x-rays are about 10 TRILLION TIMES this. "Published Research" as far I know shows that dangers of cancer result from exposure to UV waves or better, but not having access to this "Mystery Data" what do I know? It is truly ashame that a doctor of "respectable" position isn't capable of grasping basic highschool physics.
Reply to this comment View reply
by misfire99 July 25, 2008 1:46 AM PDT
It's all about money. He can't publish anything in a peer reviewed journal so he comes out with this memo and gets his name in the news. Then maybe he will get hired again or have his funding renewed. He's just a scammer with an MD after his name.
Reply to this comment
by misfire99 July 25, 2008 1:50 AM PDT
It's all about money. He can't publish anything in a peer reviewed journal so he comes out with this memo and gets his name in the news. Then maybe he will get hired again or have his funding renewed. He's just a scamer with an MD after his name.

I just did a medline search on his name. He only has one published work and his name is way down on the list. Here is the pubmed ID

PMID: 16888034 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

This guy should be brought up for disciplinary action.
Reply to this comment
by jamalystic July 25, 2008 8:04 AM PDT
If this is the case then , how comes some doctors are using mobile phones to monitor healthcare according to this blog: Doctors Unplugged: Monitoring Healthcare With Cellphones(http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=526&doc_id=147482&F_src=flftwo). I think this guy has to be ashame of himself and i'm upset that we are giving too much undue attention!!
Reply to this comment
by Qwedeare July 25, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
I would like to thank you. You have shared the same part of mind, and I would like to add that KNOWELDGE IS THE ONLY TREATMENT FOR IGNORANT.
Reply to this comment
by not1975 July 26, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
Wow, this is a particularly bad peice of science news. FoxNews and CNN would be very proud...

Utlimately, this guy is making claims without evidence, which means what he is saying is worthless. Science is based on evidence, authority != truth.

Also, the beginning of this article is inaccurate. This is not a legitmate science controversy. There is no legitmate evidence showing that cell phones are dangerous. There isn't even a known mechanism: microwaves are non-ionizing and can't break the bonds in DNA or other cells and can't cause cancer!

When this guy puts his evidence where his mouth is, well, *that* might be another story.
Reply to this comment
by Marie7399 August 12, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
I don't know about the scientific validity of these claims, but from personal experience I agree that the radiation from cell phones can have an effect on our health. I had a large brain tumor removed from my cerebellum 6 years ago. I do not attribute it's growth to cell phone usage, however now whenever I use my phone for more than a few minutes, I begin to feel throbbing and sometimes shooting pain in the same area. This does not occur at any other time except for when talking on the cell phone. I switched to a blue tooth device about 2 years ago hoping it would help, but had the same experience. Now I use my phone only when I have to, and almost always on speaker phone if at all possible. I also agree that it sounds strange, and I can't "scientifically" prove it of course, but I can't seem to tell my head that!
Reply to this comment
by 3rdalbum September 6, 2008 7:48 PM PDT
Marie, it's a psychological effect caused by your phone ear heating up. Your ear heats up because it's in close contact with an object, not because the phone is shooting high-frequency gamma rays into your head :-P

Switching to Bluetooth doesn't help because you've already got into the pattern of expecting the pain when on the phone.

If the "scientist" believes that Bluetooth is harmful, then he's an even bigger fool. Mobile phones have a range of 500 metres. The Bluetooth transcievers in the earpieces have a range of 10-50 metres. It's an order of magnitude lower in frequency and power. Of course, wireless networks run at the same range and power - where's the public health warning on this? What's next - smartcard readers are going to kill us through cancer of the hand?
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right