• On TechRepublic: Five reasons why Windows Vista failed
August 29, 2008 10:11 AM PDT

More tidbits on the new Comcast cap (updated)

Posted by Josh Lowensohn
  • Font size
  • Print

Thursday's news about the upcoming 250 GB monthly cap for Comcast data subscribers left some questions unanswered. I shot a few of my own, as well as some from readers over to Comcast to get them answered. These are mostly items that did not appear in both the post about the amendment, or the otherwise comprehensive FAQ page.

Update at 5:05 p.m. PDT: In a bizarre twist, the previous answers to my questions were answered by someone named Bill G., who Comcast says is not an authorized spokesperson for the company, despite answering my e-mail sent through the company's press contacts page. Charlie Douglas, who is Director of Corporate Communications for Comcast's Online & Voice Services, wrote me back to let me know the "correct" answers to these questions. I've highlighted where the previous unofficial answers differed for the sake of continuity, although the only major differentiation from the unofficial contact is the mention of Comcast developing its own bandwidth monitoring and notification service for its customers, which is apparently not happening.

Q: Will people who go over for the second time be able to challenge the account suspension, or is the two strikes and you're out policy the standard?
Charlie Douglas: If a customer receives a call that he/she has exceeded 250 GB in a month, then we ask them to please moderate their usage. The vast majority of customers do so voluntarily. During that first call, however, we also explain that, per our Acceptable Use Policy, if they are among our heaviest users for a second time in the following six months, that we reserve the right to suspend their account for 12 months. Again, this is an extremely small number of customers--far less than 1 percent--and is a policy that does not affect more than 99 percent of our customers.

Will there be a usage meter available on Comcast subscriber's online account information?
Douglas: There are numerous free or fee-based meters that are widely available on the Internet to anyone who wants one.
(Editor's note: This differs from our unofficial contact who said "Comcast is developing a meter to track your bandwidth." We've got a write-up of ways to do this using various software tools.)

Will you be offering larger bandwidth packages for home businesses or "excessive users?"
Douglas: Our excessive use policy is only for residential service customers. As of today, this policy does not apply to our commercial services customers.

How does this factor in with users of your Digital Voice service? On average how much bandwidth does that service take up?
Douglas: Comcast Digital Voice is a completely separate service and is not a factor.

We've also had some questions about the bandwidth averages cited on this page. 2-3 GB median monthly bandwidth seems incredibly low, as does the figure for how large an e-mail is (0.05KB/e-mail). Most messages in my inbox hover between 10-50k. Was it a typo for 0.05MB?
Douglas: 2 to 3 GB/month is the median monthly amount used by our residential high-speed Internet customers. The examples we provided at www.comcast.net/networkmanagement are illustrative of how much activity would be required to reach 250GB in a month. More than 99 percent of our customers do not come close to using more than that amount.

Got any other questions you feel are unanswered? Leave them in the comments and we can send out a second round.

Josh Lowensohn is an associate editor for Webware.com, CNET's blog about cool and otherwise useful Web applications and services. If you've found a site you'd like profiled, shoot him an e-mail. E-mail Josh.
Recent posts from Webware
New Firefox extension turns Amazon.com into illegal free-for-all
Google, Hallmark Channel team up for TV ads
Tech layoffs: The scorecard
Boarding helps you find other stranded travelers
Flickr adds a credit system for tags
Amazon Mobile now ringing up sales on iPhone
Streaming-music recorder in murky legal waters
Wikipedia gets $890,000 for the Luddites
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 159 comments
by themike5000 August 29, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
One question... What is the phone number for Verizon Wireless?
Reply to this comment
by cicad August 30, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
Try http://www22.verizon.com/
It's fast, cheap and no bandwidth limit!
-Ivan Romanov
by Namtok August 29, 2008 10:52 AM PDT
So I signed up for an unlimited internet package. Obviously it is no longer unlimited, so will the rates change?
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn August 29, 2008 11:03 AM PDT
I actually couldn't find the term "unlimited" anywhere on Comcast's site, although I think it's generally assumed because it isn't written anywhere that there's a limit of how much downloading you can do--at least until now.
by seeker_all August 29, 2008 6:53 PM PDT
After contacting live online help at Comcast, I was informed a request can be made to continue unlimited usage. Below is an extract of the conversation which I hope will help others maintain the product they signed up for - UNLIMITED internet usage.

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:27:28 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>
Hi.

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:27:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>
I spend 61.16 per month purely for internet connection. I use Vonage, data back ups for two computers to internet sources, I utilize online streaming video. How can the MOST expensive internet connection place a limit?

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:28:41 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

Your concern is regarding the limit for your internet?

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:28:57 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

yes

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:30:49 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

I signed up for unlimited usage because I need the unlimited usage. This is a change in product

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:33:40 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

how will I be assured that i will continue to have unlimited usage?

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:34:34 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

I requested here to give your internet service an unlimited usage.

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:36:05 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

how do I get confirmation?

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:37:18 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

I will give you a confirmation number now regarding the request.


Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:37:38 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

good, now how do I receive confirmation that I do indeed have unlimited access?

Jeff_(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:39:03 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

thank you, by the way, how long do you assume the request will take to process? And, have you see such requests like mine approved?

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:39:42 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

Yes, infact my request has been approved. I also request my internet to be unlimited 2 weeks ago and it was approved.

Denise Donna(Thu Aug 28 2008 22:42:27 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time))>

Thank you for holding. Your confirmation number is: CRXXXXXXXXX.
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:34 PM PDT
The 'Unlimited' statement isn't on their website. It's in their ADS, which are even more enforceable than something on their website. The fact is that Comcast is going to have to realize that bandwidth demands are going up, and they are just going to have to start investing in their networks like anyone else does.
by cicad August 30, 2008 9:39 AM PDT
Try http://www22.verizon.com/
It's fast, cheap and no bandwidth limit!
-Ivan Romanov
by parsnipnose3000 September 29, 2008 7:50 PM PDT
After speaking to comcast this evening they insisted it IS "unlimited". Unlimited in the sense that you can do anything you like, but not in the sense that you can do it as much as you like. So content is not unlimited, but quantity is.
by thrusterbutt August 29, 2008 10:59 AM PDT
This is another example of Comcast's disservice to customers. More and more people are doing more and more things on the internet. forward thinking ISPs are providing more bandwidth with no caps. One good thing, it will surely make it easier to choose a competitive solution.
Reply to this comment
by Gaurasells August 29, 2008 11:01 AM PDT
Ask them if we users, who are paying for this service, have the RIGHT to NOT accept advertisements coming along with the downloads?
These ads probably consume a large percentage of the download bandwidth.
Reply to this comment
by NikEst August 29, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
Question One.... How do they differentiate between downloads of files (say a movie) and regular websites?

Question Two.... Why don't they charge people who go over extra and invest that in their network instead of dropping their customers?

Question Three.... When will FIOS be available in my area?
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn August 29, 2008 11:24 AM PDT
Good questions--at least the first two ;)

You'll have to call Verizon to find out about FiOS.
by Laserdisc August 30, 2008 6:50 AM PDT
FiOS will be available in your area as soon as Verizon bribes enough politicians to help them overturn exclusive contracts cable operators made with your local county.
by danthalis August 29, 2008 11:02 AM PDT
So even though I am paying $90 a month for a 16 meg connection, with this limit I can only use that speed (which I paid for) for 35 hours before being over the 250GB limit.... How is that in the least bit fair? If you're going to limit my total use, then you can't in the same token charge me extra for a faster connection... Comcast is once again sticking it to it's customers to save themselves a buck, what a joke. Go ADSL I am switching my account today!

Not to mention that I have a family of five, so that's 12 HD movies per month max for my family, so long as we don't read any email or play games. Oh and if MS hits me with a service pack and that pushes me over my limit, I suppose I should be pissed at MS for not knowing what my current usage was?

Please let netflix and MS and any other big dog sue the pants off of comcast for limitings *their* customers usage. Comcast doesn't own the internet, or the content on it, who the hell are they to try and regulate it's usage?
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 August 29, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
How often do you get a full 16Mb/s? How long can you sustain 16Mb/s?

I'm not saying this is a good move on their parts - just that saying you will only get 35 hours of usage is a little disingenuous.
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:37 PM PDT
Rapier1, I get almost very good speeds on my Comcast connection, almost at 10MB speeds even though I am only supposed to get 5 or 6 in my area. And, from using my Bittorrent, I get them CONSISTENTLY. So yes, the 35 hours thing for this guy is pretty much accurate.
by BCF1968 August 30, 2008 2:53 PM PDT
Getting 12 HD movies LEGALLY would be around 75 GB. So that leaves 175 GB left to use. People bring up bittorrent. Please, anyone getting movies, music, games etc from that is committing a crime anyways. Comcast is under no obligation to help you do that. It takes A LOT of work to get to 250 GB LEGALLY. Also no one uses their internet connection full bore for 35 hours straight. When I'm on this website reading comments I'm not consistently using bandwidth. it's like that on most sites. 90% of the time you're on a site you actually aren't using any bandwidth at all. Sure if I'm on Hulu watching a movie for 2 hours I'm constantly using bandwidth for 2 hours, but not even at 10% of 16 Mbps. If you legally purchase 12 HD movies a month that's $72. if you can afford that it seems like you can afford a second account. A family of 5? Maybe the teen-agers should have a job and help pay for thier own account.

As far a suing Comcast? On what grounds? Hughesnet and Wildblue satellite ISPs have always had caps( caps that are 5% or less than what Comcast is going to have ) and they haven't been sued. Cell phone companies have 5 GB a month caps( that's 5 as in FIVE ) for thier internet and they haven't been sued. Hell Verizon charges $256 per GB overage. I have yet to see a lawsuit filed against them.

Though I'm think it's dubious that the median useage Comcast claims is 2-3 GB a month and also think more than 0.1% use more than 250 GB I still feel that 99% of the people worrying about this don't come anywhere near the 250 cap. people that go over because they illegally download movies and stuff from bittorrent I have no sympathy for. Get your stuff legally like everyone else. If you get your stuff legally and somehow still use more than 250 GB then you can still go over the cap twice a year. The rest of the time you'll just have to adjust your useage.
by JasonDJ August 29, 2008 11:04 AM PDT
Of course *their* digital voice service won't count towards the bandwidth cap. Only their competitors, like Vonage and Skype...and this is exactly what's wrong with having bandwidth caps.
Reply to this comment
by MadBand August 29, 2008 11:11 AM PDT
I really think the big companies need to help us the consumer fight comcast.

Netflix, Blockbuster, Amazon, Real Networks, Vonage, Skype and so many many more. This *WILL* hurt them.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:37 PM PDT
You hit the nail on the head. People need to start protesting these bandwidth caps and enlisting the big name companies to help them fight the bandwidth caps.
by skillingssucks August 29, 2008 11:12 AM PDT
This is nothing more than an attempt to get around "net neutrality" using bandwidth issues as a red herring. Comcast doesn't want Directv, Vudu, iTunes, NetFlix and the YouTubes of the world competing with their own offerings. That's what this is all about. How long will it take for a Directv customer using Directv's "On Demand" service (which uses the Internet) to reach the cap? How about a Vudu or Roku customer? What about when YouTube has high definition videos, and so on and so on?

The Canadians ISP's made the same arguments when they instituted their caps that American ISP's are now making, then later when investigations were done, it was shown that they had no bandwidth clogging issues at all.

I'm sure Comcast has no problem with you downloading their own video services via Comcast On Demand all day long without any limitations whatsoever.

These kinds of caps will forever change how the Internet can be used. Don't let them do it! Lodge your complaints with your local franchise board, representatives and the FCC.
Reply to this comment
by geodesy August 29, 2008 11:18 AM PDT
I'm an engineer, land surveyor and GIS professional. I work from home in a large condominium community in Westchester where the only digtial service available is Comcast. I routinely download very large graphic, CADD and GIS files when I work from home. These files can easily run to over 100Mbs a file.

Since I am currently undergoing chemotherapy for leukemia I'm working at home quite often. I can easily surpass the 250 GB limit in month.

What happens to me? It is my understanding I can't obtain a commercial account in my location.
Reply to this comment
by mijcar August 29, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
First consider resorting to the Disabilities Act, which might afford you some protection. This is new territory for Comcast and running into a suit for violating your civil rights might make them think twice.

You might consider getting Comcast to install two cable lines into your home. Why not? They can certain install two cables if your home were a duplex. Of course, organizing both lines' usage would be a PITA, but it might provide a temporary solution until Comcast gets hit with other suits (restraint of trade for charging Vonage users for the same service Comcast provides but doesn't charge for, de facto monopoly because of the limited market possibilities, etc)

Truly, I forsee a huge class action suit in the near future.
by Stormspace August 29, 2008 5:33 PM PDT
You can get a sonicwall router and tie two accounts together, whether DSL or Cable.
by umbrae August 29, 2008 11:26 AM PDT
I smell another congressional panel and FCC hearings. This is totally to keep people from using the competitors services, and another way to limit BitTorrent and P2P without "targeting" it specifically. Comcast is the ONLY ISP I see complaining about Bandwidth. They are just too cheap to get enough to handle their customer base, and provide they service they advertised.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:40 PM PDT
Well, they aren't the ONLY one: Time Warner Cable was ******** about it and still is to a certain extent, AOL was ******** about it (until people started to push and ask them to PROVE that they were having bandwidth problems), etc.

A lot of these companies are saying "We don't have the bandwidth to support these people! WAAAAAH! We're going to have to upgrade and lose money for short or long periods of time, that will cut into our profits!"

A Congressional investigation and FCC hearings needs to be done immediately, if not sooner.
by rshearin August 30, 2008 5:40 AM PDT
Investors are the only ones who can truly fight this. (by saying, "no thank you" when offered this stock.)

Otherwise, It's simply a question of divvying up the money between fat salaries, bonuses, etc for upper company executives and fees and penalties for lawyers and politicians when it should have been put into infrastructure improvements.
by Steve_in_Georgia August 29, 2008 11:27 AM PDT
My two teenage sons play XBox Live all the time. I would imagine they use up the cap in about three days. If the FCC even allows this to happen, Comcast will end up being sued and will lose a huge customer base. I'm calling AT&T today and switching to DSL.
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 August 29, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
Do your son's game use full bandwidth? Doubtful to say the least. Most of these games are geared to run in less than 200Kb/s which would be a hundred or so days of continuous play. As I said, this doesn't make this cap good business and really limits things for some people who have legitimate uses (for example, every few months I back up my hard drives to my servers at work). However, there is no way that XBox game playing will consume 250GB in a few days.
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:43 PM PDT
Yes, rapier1, it will. Because, gaming is not the ONLY thing that you do online in XBoxLive. You download game demos (which can be past 2GB's per game in some cases, and 1GB is the mean) as well, so that can push your usage past this 250GB's.
It is simply time to start telling ISP's that they have to offer full-speed all the time with NO bandwidth caps. If they cannot support that, they have to upgrade their networks until they can, even putting fiber-optic in that last 100 feet to the homes if they have to.
by GlennAllen August 29, 2008 11:27 AM PDT
Yes... how large is an email message? According to Comcast it's 0.05KB... huh? That's five hundredths or five percent of 1 KB (1024 bytes), which is about 50 bytes. The typical header is larger than that. Sooo, typo? mis-placed decimal point?

Was that "Comcast cap" or "Comcast crap"? Inquiring minds want to know. (Good to have confirmation from them that dropping their service was the right thing to do. Hope your "congestion" clears up soon. :D)
Reply to this comment
by Josh.Lowensohn August 29, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
I am almost positive it was a typo, but it was not confirmed as such. Even tiny e-mails have enough embedded data to push them over that cap.
by Nael August 29, 2008 11:30 AM PDT
One question? Why do you offer "Power Boost" if you are putting a cap limit. This is hypocritical, you can have fast download speed 16mb but there is a cap now. I use Netflix video streaming and I can easily go over 250 gb in less than one month.

Time for http://www.speakeasy.net/home/dsl/ ADSL solutions. Looks like I will also cancel my triple play package as well and move to tmobile @ home and get Dish Network. No need to get a bundle any more.
Reply to this comment
by Nael August 29, 2008 11:31 AM PDT
One question? Why do you offer "Power Boost" if you are putting a cap limit. This is hypocritical, you can have fast download speed 16mb but there is a cap now. I use Netflix video streaming and I can easily go over 250 gb in less than one month.

Time for http://www.speakeasy.net/home/dsl/ ADSL solutions. Looks like I will also cancel my triple play package as well and move to tmobile @ home and get Dish Network. No need to get a bundle any more.
Reply to this comment
by was_a_guru August 29, 2008 11:32 AM PDT
As far as using a bandwidth meter to determine usage, I may be wrong, but bandwidth meters only show bandwidth speed, NOT usage. Additionally if you have more than one computer on a network to track your usage it seems to me that you would need something in either at the isp site, in your modem, or in your router.
Reply to this comment
by MadBand August 29, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
Exactly! We have 2 Desktops, 2 media center PC's 2 laptops plus xbox 360, ps3 and wii there is no way to watch our limit on our own.
by rapier1 August 29, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
Actually there are a number of ways to do this with a single router handling multiple machines. None of them are particularly easy for most users though.
by bmohr1 August 29, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
You are correct.
by Earl Benzar August 29, 2008 11:35 AM PDT
This is an example why net neutrality, in the absence of truly robust competition, is needed. Congress either needs to eliminate the cable monopolies or regulate these guys heavily. One or the other. I don't care which, but something needs to be done.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:46 PM PDT
You are exactly right. The 'free enterprise and capitalism over all' people keep on saying that we shouldn't do that, because it would give companies a disincentive to do business in our country. Well, if they don't want to play by reasonable and just rules, I say I freaking well don't want them in our country! Move out, let someone else who has a better business model move in, and to heck with these companies who are not smart enough or willing enough to invest in infrastructure to compete.
by skepticblue August 29, 2008 11:36 AM PDT
There is a conflict between Bill G's statement that the cap applies to downloads only and an example Comcast gives about the cap (uploading 25,000 HD pics). I think what Bill G meant to say was that the cap applies to Internet service only. As I understand it, the cap applies to uploads + downloads < 250 GB.

I'm a happy FIOS user: $64 for 20Mb/s up and 20Mb/s down and quantities of up + down > 500GB/mth (mostly bittorrent). I just paid $12 more (from $52) to go from 5Mb/s up to 20 Mb/s up -- it really makes keeping a good bt ratio a snap.)


, so that the 20Mb/s up is important also)
Reply to this comment
by bmohr1 August 29, 2008 11:38 AM PDT
Google bandwidth measurement tools or any PC based tools won't work. You need a system that knows you Comcast IP address and tracks upload and download traffic based on that IP address. PC or Mac based tools won't work because they track the traffic out of the PC's ethernet port. This causes a problem when you are tranfering or streaming files between machine as those files are also counted giving you a false reading. Also, they will not track any of the traffic from an PS3, Wii, or Xbox 360. You need a Comcast web tool or a router that will give you this information. Right now I don't believe either exist.

I also expect to have the cap increased every time they increase the speed of the network. If they don't then the speed won't be worth it. You will just reach the cap quickly.

Plus I don't know where they get their figures, but a SD movie of DVD quality is around 4GB. That's the typical size of a DVD. True HD movies have not really hit the web yet as they are still 25GB in 1080p.
Reply to this comment
by texaslabrat August 29, 2008 1:40 PM PDT
1) You are making this more difficult that it has to be. There are definitely tools available that can handle the job for a single PC as well as your entire network (assuming that your broadband router can deliver the standard SNMP bandwidth data). While it might be too difficult for the average user, I suspect that most people who are downloading so much that they are in danger of hitting the cap are probably sophisticated enough to figure it out or at least know where to go for help

2) No arguments there...if they have a capped total bandwidth then why not uncap the speeds and just use some sort of fair weighted queuing to handle the individual streams?

3) No, an SD movie of DVD quality from the internet isn't anywhere near 4GB in size unless you're downloading a raw rip from a DVD (in MPEG2). Most downloads are encoded in some flavor of MPEG4 and are typically 1GB or less...hence the 250 movie line. There are exceptions, of course (tivo's amazon unbox downloads are MPEG2, though they aren't DVD quality but rather MPEG2 encodings of the MPEG4 version that is offered for PC downloads), but for the most part you'd be hard pressed to find someone offering MPEG2 stuff for download when there are so many other, more efficient, codecs to use. No arguments about the true-HD stuff though...however most people would probably be satisfied with a carefully authored 720p version of most movies if they were available online (eg xbox live offerings). The true videophiles are going to buy the bluray discs anyway, so the folks that really care about having full-blown 1080p will have it while the rest of the people will happily watch 720p over the internet.
by Lerianis August 29, 2008 10:50 PM PDT
texasalabrat, I am sorry, but on the last point you are wrong. An SD movie of DVD quality can range from 1GB to 4GB's, even WITHOUT it being a DVD rip. I record videos online with Microsoft Media Center in Vista, and 1 2 hour movie is about 8GB's. Don't ask me why the freak it is so damn big, I honestly don't know why it is, considering that I can get the same movie online encoded in MPEG-4 or x.264 and it's BARELY 750MB's.
by slashMike August 29, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
I am so upset about this. Like probably most Comcast customers I too have no other internet choice. Starting today I am going to be mobilizing my community to get another choice. Comcast you have truthfully screwed yourself because we are stronger than you think we are!
Reply to this comment
by moore614 September 14, 2008 9:47 AM PDT
I would fully support any effort within my community to open the doors to full competition. Unless Comcast revisits this decision, I am going to move all my business to other providers.
 See all 159 Comments >>
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

Confessions of a man who does the layoffs

It's easy to vilify the guy who hands out the pink slips. But contrary to popular notions, these aren't decisions that are taken lightly, at least with the executive we interviewed.


Dell racks up Microsoft as data center customer

After finding itself on the losing end of a number of deals, Dell creates a special unit aimed at getting its gear inside the world's largest data centers.


advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right