10 things we'd like to see in Chrome

So far we're pretty smitten with Google's Chrome. It's certainly not without its faults, but for version 1.0 of a browser it's pretty sharp. We've compiled a list of 10 things we'd really like to see added or tweaked. Some come from other browsers, and some are just improvements on some of the existing features. Google, we hope you're listening.
1. Profile roaming between multiple browsers. This may be a pipe dream, but if Foxmarks for Firefox has proved anything, syncing up your bookmarks between multiple machines is awesome. Doing the same with passwords, settings, and history would be even better. Considering Google already has a way for your browser to send data back to the mothership, and a hosted Web history service of its own, a little sync using my Google account doesn't seem that hard does it?
2. Better bookmark management. Speaking of bookmarks, the bookmarking system in Chrome is about as basic as it gets. "Stripped-down" might be a better way to describe it. On the outset, it seems as robust as Firefox 3's with a really simple one-click way to save links. Where the system falls apart is the lack of tools for organization, and a complete lack of a back-up tool to save your short (or long) list of favorite sites. Of course, a bookmarks plug-in like Delicious would help sort this out, which brings us to the next yearning...

Chrome's bookmark management is incredibly sparse compared with some of the more mature offerings from browsers like Firefox 3. (click to enlarge)
(Credit: CBS Interactive)3. Plug-ins. Google has acknowledged that plug-ins are on the road map, which is a good thing. Here's how the search giant can totally one-up Mozilla, though: let me install and make changes to extensions without having to restart the browser. Nothing is worse than having 30 tabs open and having to restart, even if it remembers what I had open before. This reminds me...
4. Saved sessions/Warning messages when closing multiple tabs. Firefox's little warning for when you're closing a group of tabs was a huge lifesaver in version two. Firefox 3 brought with it a way to save that grouping of open tabs for later. Chrome has neither of these features. Accidentally closing your browser with a slew of tabs open means they're gone for good--that is unless you set it from the default option of clearing what you were looking at. Chrome is also nice enough to tell you some of the most recently closed tabs back on its special start page, but that's it.

This warning feature in Firefox has saved this author many hours of hardship over the years. Sadly it is missing from Google's Chrome.
(Credit: CBS Interactive)5. A full-screen mode. I love the minimalism of Chrome, but sometimes I just want those extra 60-90 vertical pixels back. Give me a keyboard shortcut for this too, and I'll be in screen hog heaven.
6. A more customizable interface. The blue is neat, but getting that great deep purple found in incognito mode is enough of a tease to make me want to change the way it looks based on how I'm feeling. Plus, you've taken away the nice special Windows-theme coloring I had when you got rid of the top of the application, so let me choose how I want it to look. Bonus points for a tie-dye mode or something that changes depending on what time of day it is--like your personalized homepage service iGoogle.

Dragging tabs in and out of windows is really cool. Trying to do this with sites you've designated as applications does not work though.
7. A way to drag "applications" back into the main browser. The option to turn a certain site into a self-contained browser window with a stripped-down interface is great. However, the inability to drag it back into an open Chrome browser window is maddening when you're trying to re-open some real estate on the task bar. You can do this with existing tabs and windows, and it works great.
8. A Mac/Linux version. The lack of a Mac client has left the growing percentage of Mac users in a bit of a tizzy. Worse yet, based on Google's track record with some of its other cross-platform software offerings like Google Earth and Google Desktop search, the Mac has fared a little worse with slower release schedules and less features than its PC siblings. Hopefully new features will be rolled out to all the platforms at about the same time.
9. A pop-up blocker that blocks. Clearly Google is trying to shake things up with a pop-up blocker that really should be called a "pop-up relocator," since it not only lets them open but also load. Frankly, this drives me nuts since I have to close them down to get them off the screen. Also if it's really important and something I meant to click, I have to go drag it off from the bottom of the screen.
10. A regular old search box. Yes progress is good and the "omnibar" does a pretty slam-dunk job of getting new searches going, but let's get some of the ambiguity away from that thing and have an option to leave it for URLs only. Also, a separate search box would let me pick from the other multitude of search providers in addition to Google without compromising my screen real estate.
Any you think we missed? Leave them in the comments.
Update: Changed number 4's lack of a session saver, although this feature is turned off by default.
Josh Lowensohn is an associate editor for Webware.com, CNET's blog about cool and otherwise useful Web applications and services. If you've found a site you'd like profiled, shoot him an e-mail. E-mail Josh.
- Topics:
-
Browsers and extensions
- Tags:
-
Google Chrome,
-
browsers,
-
improvements,
-
Chrome
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us



@BCF1968: Firefox is the best in those categories, I don't know where you heard otherwise, but you need to get your facts straight.
Also, applications are meant to be used separately. There is no reason to want to reatttach them. That's what tearing away tabs is for....
I'm scheming with some friends on how to write that... I'll let you know how it goes.
don't ask for features if you haven't even taken a look at the browser's options.
Namely, the having browser tabs in separate processes (I was wondering why there were 12 instances of it in my Task Manager).
That would make it better, though.
I would have assumed that a GMarks like thing would have been implimented into Chrome from the begining, it is google after all. I'm sure in time it'll be that way.
....just dont get foxmarks....
Anyway, Chrome is great and I use it on the rare occasions when I run that program, what's its name? Oh yeah, Windows.
So you'll browse with Google, search with Google and get all your mail thru Google as well? You trust them that much eh?
Do you really want to keep all your personal eggs in one Google basket?
Personally I'd trust Google as far as I could throw Bill Gates!
I hope by the time the mac version is out, all this extra's are added because if I don't get everything that firefox already has, saving only 2 milliseconds to load a page is not enough reason for me to switch.
Chrome is wonderfully fast, but I was shocked at all the advertisements that I haven't seen in years. Including this page. On Firefox, this page is clean and quiet. On Chrome, it's cacophony.
I'm still sticking with FireFox for the majority of my browsing, especially at work (I'm a developer, so I spend a lot of time on code sites), but I have to admit that for email and such, I am leaning towards Chrome because it's screamingly fast at page rendering. If they start adding in some (but not all) of the features of FireFox, it will be a nice, happy medium.
I see all the Google gadgets syncing and communicating with each other soon.
-
by andrefavron
September 4, 2008 7:47 PM PDT
- speaking of incognito... this feature will make it very difficult to monitor what our children are doing when on-line.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
-
by shakethebabyass2
September 6, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
- You can download k9 web protection for free and monitor and restrict everything that goes on. Thats what Ive had to do becuase my kids are to smart.
-
-
-
by denzii2006
September 8, 2008 6:12 AM PDT
- Perhaps a Password to protect the ingognito pages from loading. This way your kids can't open them.
-
-
See all 222 Comments >>www.k9webprotection.com