• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
September 4, 2008 5:43 PM PDT

10 things we'd like to see in Chrome

Posted by Josh Lowensohn
  • Print

So far we're pretty smitten with Google's Chrome. It's certainly not without its faults, but for version 1.0 of a browser it's pretty sharp. We've compiled a list of 10 things we'd really like to see added or tweaked. Some come from other browsers, and some are just improvements on some of the existing features. Google, we hope you're listening.

1. Profile roaming between multiple browsers. This may be a pipe dream, but if Foxmarks for Firefox has proved anything, syncing up your bookmarks between multiple machines is awesome. Doing the same with passwords, settings, and history would be even better. Considering Google already has a way for your browser to send data back to the mothership, and a hosted Web history service of its own, a little sync using my Google account doesn't seem that hard does it?

2. Better bookmark management. Speaking of bookmarks, the bookmarking system in Chrome is about as basic as it gets. "Stripped-down" might be a better way to describe it. On the outset, it seems as robust as Firefox 3's with a really simple one-click way to save links. Where the system falls apart is the lack of tools for organization, and a complete lack of a back-up tool to save your short (or long) list of favorite sites. Of course, a bookmarks plug-in like Delicious would help sort this out, which brings us to the next yearning...

Chrome's bookmark management is incredibly sparse compared with some of the more mature offerings from browsers like Firefox 3. (click to enlarge)

(Credit: CBS Interactive)

3. Plug-ins. Google has acknowledged that plug-ins are on the road map, which is a good thing. Here's how the search giant can totally one-up Mozilla, though: let me install and make changes to extensions without having to restart the browser. Nothing is worse than having 30 tabs open and having to restart, even if it remembers what I had open before. This reminds me...

4. Saved sessions/Warning messages when closing multiple tabs. Firefox's little warning for when you're closing a group of tabs was a huge lifesaver in version two. Firefox 3 brought with it a way to save that grouping of open tabs for later. Chrome has neither of these features. Accidentally closing your browser with a slew of tabs open means they're gone for good--that is unless you set it from the default option of clearing what you were looking at. Chrome is also nice enough to tell you some of the most recently closed tabs back on its special start page, but that's it.

This warning feature in Firefox has saved this author many hours of hardship over the years. Sadly it is missing from Google's Chrome.

(Credit: CBS Interactive)

5. A full-screen mode. I love the minimalism of Chrome, but sometimes I just want those extra 60-90 vertical pixels back. Give me a keyboard shortcut for this too, and I'll be in screen hog heaven.

6. A more customizable interface. The blue is neat, but getting that great deep purple found in incognito mode is enough of a tease to make me want to change the way it looks based on how I'm feeling. Plus, you've taken away the nice special Windows-theme coloring I had when you got rid of the top of the application, so let me choose how I want it to look. Bonus points for a tie-dye mode or something that changes depending on what time of day it is--like your personalized homepage service iGoogle.

Dragging tabs in and out of windows is really cool. Trying to do this with sites you've designated as applications does not work though.

7. A way to drag "applications" back into the main browser. The option to turn a certain site into a self-contained browser window with a stripped-down interface is great. However, the inability to drag it back into an open Chrome browser window is maddening when you're trying to re-open some real estate on the task bar. You can do this with existing tabs and windows, and it works great.

8. A Mac/Linux version. The lack of a Mac client has left the growing percentage of Mac users in a bit of a tizzy. Worse yet, based on Google's track record with some of its other cross-platform software offerings like Google Earth and Google Desktop search, the Mac has fared a little worse with slower release schedules and less features than its PC siblings. Hopefully new features will be rolled out to all the platforms at about the same time.

9. A pop-up blocker that blocks. Clearly Google is trying to shake things up with a pop-up blocker that really should be called a "pop-up relocator," since it not only lets them open but also load. Frankly, this drives me nuts since I have to close them down to get them off the screen. Also if it's really important and something I meant to click, I have to go drag it off from the bottom of the screen.

10. A regular old search box. Yes progress is good and the "omnibar" does a pretty slam-dunk job of getting new searches going, but let's get some of the ambiguity away from that thing and have an option to leave it for URLs only. Also, a separate search box would let me pick from the other multitude of search providers in addition to Google without compromising my screen real estate.

Any you think we missed? Leave them in the comments.

Update: Changed number 4's lack of a session saver, although this feature is turned off by default.

Click here for full coverage of the Google Chrome launch.

Josh Lowensohn is an associate editor for Webware.com, CNET's blog about cool and otherwise useful Web applications and services. If you've found a site you'd like profiled, shoot him an e-mail. E-mail Josh.
Recent posts from Webware
Boarding helps you find other stranded travelers
Flickr adds a credit system for tags
Amazon Mobile now ringing up sales on iPhone
Streaming-music recorder in murky legal waters
Wikipedia gets $890,000 for the Luddites
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 222 comments
by axis_304 September 4, 2008 5:59 PM PDT
I could be wrong, but almost everything mentioned there is just a feature of firefox. Addons, firefox has them, cross platform, firefox has that, themes firefox has as well. So really all you guys want is a faster firefox?
Reply to this comment
by rgersmrk September 6, 2008 4:41 AM PDT
lol, I was about to type out the same thing.
by BCF1968 September 6, 2008 9:18 AM PDT
When are you FireFox fanboys going to get it that some of us never have and never will like FireFox. It's pretty simple. Out of IE, FF, Opera and Chrome, FF will be 4th on my list of browsers I would use. The fact the FF biggest issue is speed and memory useage and after being told over and over again to fix it and they still don't even try what does that tell you.
by cbasden September 6, 2008 9:44 AM PDT
Why is everyone so nuts about Firefox? The Chrome article in fact only compared it to Firefiox like there is no other browser.
by evenicoulddoit September 7, 2008 2:45 AM PDT
I think people are highlighting a key issue here about people wanting a Firefox, or indeed a better one. I think the problem I have found with Firefox 3 is that they have completely compromised functionality for an impressive GUI and an extensive list of features. Whilst I'd like Chrome to have a number of these features, or moreover to simply enhance a couple of their already existing features such as the bookmarking platform, I think they have approached browsing in completely the right way, with speed and browsing functionality being of key concern. Unlike the report above I do think that the uni-bar for both searches and for addresses is a good tool, as realistically who uses Yahoo or MSN search features over Google - and if you wish you can also change these in the settings list. I actually gave up with Firefox 3 and went back to 2 because I felt they deviated away from the original goal they set out to accomplish, something which Google appear to have taken over. THIS IS WHY WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR FIREFOX.
by c-net geek September 8, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
@cbasden: There is no other browser. The other browsers aren't remotely as good as firefox.

@BCF1968: Firefox is the best in those categories, I don't know where you heard otherwise, but you need to get your facts straight.
by awnstudio September 8, 2008 11:07 PM PDT
As stated, Chrome has a different approach to browsing, a minimalistic approach, if Firefox had the same approach as Chrome, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Firefox is fast, but Chrome is faster, better with memory, better with tabs and its in its infancy. So no, all we really want is a better browser. Hidden extras, blazing fast, better mem consumption.
by September 4, 2008 6:07 PM PDT
Don't know what you're doing wrong, but it is saving sessions flawlessly.

Also, applications are meant to be used separately. There is no reason to want to reatttach them. That's what tearing away tabs is for....
Reply to this comment
by September 4, 2008 10:12 PM PDT
Actually, I wouldn't mind snapping everything open back into one browser making it one cohesive session. For example, I found that you can't snap incognito into the main browser at all either. I would love it if you can right click a tab and there was an option for opening an incognito session that's a functioning tab in the browser's frame.

I'm scheming with some friends on how to write that... I'll let you know how it goes.
by Yittirum39 September 6, 2008 11:49 AM PDT
You can reattach applications anyway. Click on the document icon in the upper-left hand corner, then in the dropdown, select "show as tab." Then you can put it wherever you want.
by firestarter September 4, 2008 6:19 PM PDT
a home bottom would be nice and also a drop down address bar too and also when i max i want to be able to access my task bar
Reply to this comment
by alvareo September 4, 2008 7:46 PM PDT
the home button enabling is already in Chrome's options.
don't ask for features if you haven't even taken a look at the browser's options.
by cavergeek September 5, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
Uh, there is a home button. Click on the wrench and the option to show the home button is under the basics tab.
by ronin.achilles September 4, 2008 6:24 PM PDT
:)) So you are basically asking for Firefox?
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis September 7, 2008 9:45 PM PDT
Yeah, I have to agree that is basically what he is asking for. The fact is that Firefox is an extremely good web browser... though Chrome one-ups it in some areas.

Namely, the having browser tabs in separate processes (I was wondering why there were 12 instances of it in my Task Manager).
by Spartan_458 September 4, 2008 6:31 PM PDT
@ axis,

That would make it better, though.
Reply to this comment
by BradTaylor September 4, 2008 6:32 PM PDT
WHAT is everyone's fascination with Foxmarks. the GMarks addon for Firefox is SO much better. Last I used Foxmarks, the Syncing wasn't that reliable. GMarks everythings online, and when your using bookmarks your generally online, so doesnt matter if they're not on your system. GMarks has made it much easier to reinstall FF on multiple machines, no exporting/importing/syncing bookmarks, just install the addon and go.

I would have assumed that a GMarks like thing would have been implimented into Chrome from the begining, it is google after all. I'm sure in time it'll be that way.

....just dont get foxmarks....
Reply to this comment
by AndrewBNZ September 5, 2008 1:50 AM PDT
Foxmarks works seamlessly for me, I had trouble with other syncing apps in the past which couldn't get their head around the fact I would have my desktop and laptop logged on at the same time and that I wanted syncing to happen on both, simultaneously.
by geneven September 6, 2008 12:58 PM PDT
I've installed Foxmarks on maybe 50 Firefox installation and have had no problem with sync. I'll try GMarks, but there is nothing wrong with Foxmarks. If you are mentioning alternatives, why not mention Mozilla Weave? I haven't had great results with it (slows my system down) but it's still under development and shows promise.

Anyway, Chrome is great and I use it on the rare occasions when I run that program, what's its name? Oh yeah, Windows.
by geneven September 6, 2008 1:20 PM PDT
For one thing, gmarks assumes that you are running Google Bookmarks, and Foxmarks doesn't. If I don't happen to want to use Google Bookmarks, it appears that gmarks is worthless.
by Lerianis September 7, 2008 9:46 PM PDT
You haven't used FoxMarks in a long time then. It has always been able to sync my 3 browsers, no problem whatsoever.
by mauidan1 September 4, 2008 6:32 PM PDT
How about autocomplete on form fields?
Reply to this comment
by vectorizer September 4, 2008 6:34 PM PDT
In response to #4: Chrome does have the option to resume the previous browsing session on startup. It is just not set by default, like in Firefox.
Reply to this comment
by t26l September 4, 2008 6:36 PM PDT
So you're going to use Google Chrome eh?.
So you'll browse with Google, search with Google and get all your mail thru Google as well? You trust them that much eh?
Do you really want to keep all your personal eggs in one Google basket?
Personally I'd trust Google as far as I could throw Bill Gates!
Reply to this comment
by bikerelc September 4, 2008 10:00 PM PDT
I don't know about you but I bet I could throw Bill Gates pretty darn far.
by jab818 September 5, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
I dunno, some of us might be able to give gates a good heave. He's not very big.
by geneven September 6, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
Chrome is open source, so even if you don't use it, it will probably be turning up as part of Opera or Firefox anyway.
by manodud September 4, 2008 6:39 PM PDT
add keyboard shortcuts to the list
Reply to this comment
by jtkunle September 4, 2008 6:39 PM PDT
How about Google's own Toolbar built right in without even having it as an extension, if all my bookmarks are in google toolbar, I don't think copy and pasting links from Firefox makes sense, I've gotten so use to looking at my web history for sites I've visited and as a mac user, I can't even use it all.

I hope by the time the mac version is out, all this extra's are added because if I don't get everything that firefox already has, saving only 2 milliseconds to load a page is not enough reason for me to switch.
Reply to this comment
by mpitogo September 4, 2008 6:50 PM PDT
I concur with #8 Considering webkit is already on Mac OS X why was it hard to release it simultaneously?
Reply to this comment
by buggermenot September 20, 2008 9:12 AM PDT
webkit is already on linux (KDE) too. Apple hasn't released safari for llinux either
by mjconver September 4, 2008 6:54 PM PDT
Ad-block! The one feature it needs, and Google will never add, because it's totally against the business model.

Chrome is wonderfully fast, but I was shocked at all the advertisements that I haven't seen in years. Including this page. On Firefox, this page is clean and quiet. On Chrome, it's cacophony.
Reply to this comment
by mike.loux September 5, 2008 5:07 AM PDT
mjconver, I agree with you 100%. I've been using FireFox since the 1.0 beta, and one of the first extensions I installed was AdBlock (then AdBlock plus when that came out), so I've been blissfully ignorant of the onslaught of ads we get pummeled with every time we load a page for close to 5 years now. The first time I went to a commercial site using Chrome, I nearly screamed in shock from all the visual noise on the page. :-)

I'm still sticking with FireFox for the majority of my browsing, especially at work (I'm a developer, so I spend a lot of time on code sites), but I have to admit that for email and such, I am leaning towards Chrome because it's screamingly fast at page rendering. If they start adding in some (but not all) of the features of FireFox, it will be a nice, happy medium.
by lordeagle September 4, 2008 6:55 PM PDT
What version 1.0 of a browser? If you go to "About Google Chrome" in the Tools menu, it says v0.2xxxxxxxxx
Reply to this comment
by mike.loux September 5, 2008 5:08 AM PDT
That's pretty standard for a Google product. Chrome is still very much a beta application (and given their track record of wanting to make sure it's perfect before taking it off of beta status), it will most likely remain so for quite some time (GMail was in beta for 4 years).
by bigpicture September 4, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
No. 10, maybe there is something different about the way that you use a browser, than as to how I use it, but when you have the home page set to Google, and on a whole lot of other web pages besides, there is already a "search box" present on the page.
Reply to this comment
by iisensei September 4, 2008 7:12 PM PDT
I too wish to surf without ads, but the reality is that websites have to make money to exist. If they can't make money they will go out of business. Nothing is free. I will not visit sites that put ads in my face or are obnoxious with their presentations.
Reply to this comment
by RJSUSC September 4, 2008 7:26 PM PDT
As a mac user, I hear you on the slowwww release dates for us. I guess I'm used to that though as a mac user, comes with the territory. I'm definitely looking forward to using Chrome, but Firefox 3 is getting the job for me just fine.
Reply to this comment
by theonlybuster September 4, 2008 7:29 PM PDT
Everyone brings up FF and says that it's Chrome and not FF, but the fact is that FF is the browser to beat, it's the mode widely used browser (next to IE because it's forced on users). But FF is the browser to beat. So far Chrome has it beat in terms of speed, and also why not add another Google product to your desktop?
I see all the Google gadgets syncing and communicating with each other soon.
Reply to this comment
by mbPixelated September 8, 2008 8:07 AM PDT
I totally agree - FF is the one to beat and in terms of speed Chrome is right up there!
by The_Decider September 8, 2008 10:43 AM PDT
Speed is overrated and Chrome is nothing but a trojan horse
by andrefavron September 4, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
speaking of incognito... this feature will make it very difficult to monitor what our children are doing when on-line.
Reply to this comment
by public_pants September 6, 2008 11:21 AM PDT
uh? No. We "your children" can easily clear our browsing history in any browser. For example in firefox clear private data ;). Chrome just makes it such that we dont have to clear it. Its fair.
by hopskipnfall September 8, 2008 7:21 PM PDT
or even move easily and thoroughly with internet explorer. tools>internet options>delete web history>delete all or something like that. it takes out the web history and cookies and all temporary internet files to boot.
by andrefavron September 4, 2008 7:47 PM PDT
speaking of incognito... this feature will make it very difficult to monitor what our children are doing when on-line.
Reply to this comment
by shakethebabyass2 September 6, 2008 2:43 PM PDT
You can download k9 web protection for free and monitor and restrict everything that goes on. Thats what Ive had to do becuase my kids are to smart.
www.k9webprotection.com
by denzii2006 September 8, 2008 6:12 AM PDT
Perhaps a Password to protect the ingognito pages from loading. This way your kids can't open them.
 See all 222 Comments >>
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

In the news now

Confessions of a man who does the layoffs

It's easy to vilify the guy who hands out the pink slips. But contrary to popular notions, these aren't decisions that are taken lightly, at least with the executive we interviewed.


Dell racks up Microsoft as data center customer

After finding itself on the losing end of a number of deals, Dell creates a special unit aimed at getting its gear inside the world's largest data centers.


advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right