AMD files antitrust suit against Intel

update Advanced Micro Devices has fired off a federal antitrust lawsuit against Intel, claiming that its rival has a monopolistic grip on the PC industry.

The suit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court in Delaware, details alleged scare tactics and coercion that AMD claims Intel imposed on 38 companies, including large-scale computer makers, small system builders, wholesale distributors and retailers.

Hector Ruiz
Hector Ruiz
CEO, AMD

Intel processors account for more than 80 percent of the computers running x86-based chips, according to IDC. Those chips run many families of operating systems, including Microsoft Windows, Solaris and Linux. Even Apple Computer has announced that it will switch exclusively to x86 processors for running Mac OS software, beginning in 2006.

The suit is different from previous anticompetition fights between the two companies, according to AMD spokesman Mike Simonoff, in that the Sunnyvale, Calif.-based chipmaker has new information obtained from a recent investigation by Japan's Fair Trade Commission.

In that investigation, the agency said that Intel's Japan unit stifled competition by offering rebates to five Japanese PC makers--Fujitsu, Hitachi, NEC, Sony and Toshiba--which agreed not to buy or to limit their purchases of chips made by AMD and Transmeta.

"You don't have to take our word for it when it comes to Intel's abuses; the Japanese government condemned Intel for its exclusionary and illegal misconduct," Thomas McCoy, AMD's executive vice president of legal affairs and chief administrative officer, said in a statement.

News analysis
Coercion or circumstance?
AMD case could pry open lid
on Intel's high market shares.

In a statement, Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel declined to comment on specifics of the case, saying that it will respond to AMD's antitrust allegations in court.

"We strongly disagree with AMD's complaints about the business practices of Intel and Intel's customers," the statement said. "Intel believes in competing fairly and believes consumers are benefiting from this vigorous competition. AMD has chosen, once again, to complain to a court about Intel's success, with a legal case full of excuses and speculation.

Regarding the Japanese investigation, Intel said at the time that it would abide by the Fair Trade Commission's recommendations but that it disagreed with the agency's findings and with its application of the law.

One analyst suggested that the lawsuit reveals a clue to AMD's market standing.

"Rightly or wrongly, AMD's move can be seen as a clever move to take advantage of a recent favorable ruling in Japan. However, the timing of the complaint and the company's tone of indignation (perhaps exasperation) give us a sense that AMD's traction in processors that they enjoyed last year is not meeting expectations," Hans Mosesmann, an analyst at investment firm Moors & Cabot, wrote in a research report Tuesday.

"It strikes us that AMD's approach is based on throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Intel in the hopes of getting something to stick," Mosesmann wrote.

AMD Chief Executive Hector Ruiz and some of his top executives are expected to speak about the charges during a conference call later Tuesday.

The two chipmakers have a contentious history. In 2000, AMD complained to the European Commission that Intel was violating European anticompetition laws through "abusive" marketing programs.

AMD sought to give the Commission access to documents produced in another Intel antitrust case, one filed by Intergraph. The Intergraph case was eventually settled.

The European Commission has continued to investigate Intel's marketing techniques.

Among the alleged abuses detailed Monday in AMD's 48-page complaint, the company said former Compaq CEO Michael Capellas complained that Intel withheld delivery of server chips in 2000. Saying "he had a gun to his head," he told AMD he had to stop buying its processors.

According to the complaint, Gateway executives recounted to AMD that their company paid a high price for even its limited AMD

CONTINUED: ...
Page 1 | 2
More from News.com on this story's topics

Processors

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Antitrust

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Intel

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Advanced Micro Devices

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
AMD, Intergraph Corp., antitrust, Intel, Intel x86

27 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Intel no stranger in court room appearences around the world.
by 4nchip June 28, 2005 4:34 AM PDT
If the pattern continues, they will pay up to shut up as usual. Ask our friends in Japan and Europe. Go AMD!
Reply to this comment
I hope this leads to an AMD based Mac
by Juster444 June 28, 2005 6:56 AM PDT
With Apple's announcement that it is switching to Intel chips, I hope that Apple does not exclude AMD or that Intel does not force Apple to exclude AMD. I think a Turion based PowerBook would be very appealing and would be my next computer purchase if it becomes available. Can anyone who knows hardware tell me if Athlon or Turion would be a good fit with the Mac?
Reply to this comment View reply
Obvious that Intel is using high-handed tactics
by AgeOfPenguins_com June 28, 2005 7:21 AM PDT
You can't tell me that Dell is simply following the market's demand when they refuse to buy so much as 1 AMD processor. Sorry, but AMD is much more mainstream (and in demand) than that. Obviously Intel is giving them something (or threatening them) to prevent even limited AMD CPU purchases. And why wouldn't AMD fight? Of course they have to fight - they're the underdog. With a better product, yes - but still only 25% to Intel's 75%. Of course they have to be feisty and hope that "something will stick". They'd be foolish and cowardly not to. Matthew
Reply to this comment
Dells and Apples
by Tex Murphy PI June 28, 2005 8:44 AM PDT
Of the many conspiracy theories floating out there in the web, most of the Intel-related ones centered around Dell and Apple. Why is Dell adamantly sticking to Intel instead of branching out to AMD? That's a simple answer to figure out: Price, Price, AND Price. 1) Dell is one of Intel's LARGEST customers, and as such, would most likely get a sizeable volume discount. 2) Dell needs to keep support costs DOWN. Supporting two platforms will double the cost of engineering and technical support for Dell - something they don't want to do. 3) Dell's Just-In-Time inventory control is very demanding, and that kind of demand is probably something AMD cannot match at the present time. 4) Or, maybe Dell is an Intel subsidiary! <Gasp!> BTW, this is a joke for you conspiracy theorists. Conclusion: The fact that Dell is still making tons of cash, compared to HP (who sells a lot of AMD systems), is proof positive that the first three points made above are contributing factors to why Dell has decided to stay with Intel - for the time being. No consipracy theories, or illegal monopolistic activities here! Just plain business sense. As to why Apple went with Intel. 1) It may surprise many people posting here, but it was Intel, NOT AMD who courted Apple all these years to switch to Intel chips. 2) It was Intel, NOT AMD who built the relationships, and the deals that swayed Apple over, not AMD. Read it on any internet publication and you well see that Intel had been courting Apple for YEARS. 3) Any technological transition is fraught with perils. The transition from a PowerPC architecture to an Intel EMT64 x86 architect is hard enough to do - without throwing a lot more variables into the mix. So, it makes sense that Apple chose an exclusive chip vendor. 4) Apple is soon to be bought out by Intel <Gasp!>, so they must use Intel chips. BTW, this is ALSO a joke. Conclusion: Unlike the welfare system, Intel EARNED the Apple contract by offering them a compelling product line, volume-discounts, technological assistance, as well as many other intangibles that made a great deal of sense to both parties. All of these facts are available in the net for verification - you just have to read the articles objectively. www.anandtech.com www.news.com www.theregister.co.uk etc. etc. etc.
Reply to this comment
No More AMD For Me!!!!!!
by jackintucson June 28, 2005 8:53 AM PDT
For twenty years I have used Intel to drive my machin es. Finally, because of 64-bit processing, I buy an ASUS motherboard with the AMD Athlon 64. Yesterday my house took a minor power hit. Of the four machines I had online, the AMD was the only one to cook. I always use ASUS motherboards so I have to believe AMD's architecture has to be weaker than Intel's. I'm just lucky I instituted my first real backup system last week in all those twenty years. But discussing backups is for a different forum. And life goes on.... Jack In Tucson
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
Intel is a superior company
by nitehawk10 June 28, 2005 9:53 AM PDT
Intel is continuing to develop devices and motherboards. They are not too big to answer a Small user question!! The idea that something that is said in japan or europe can be used in court in this country against a taxpaying American Co. is ridiculous and unpatriotic!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Never AMD for me
by June 28, 2005 10:03 AM PDT
AMD what a bunch of sore losers, can't come up with a half way decent chip that works well with "all" applications not just some applications. Business is tough get into the game or get out. their customer service stinks too, At least Apple and Intel build a better brand and stories like this make me dislike the AMD brand even more.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Want the Real Story Go to 4ntv.com
by 4nchip June 28, 2005 11:01 AM PDT
Check out Intelamac.com. Dellamac.com etc,etc
Reply to this comment
This is antitrust case
by June 28, 2005 12:00 PM PDT
Intel is not playing fair by using various tactics to swing companies to use Intel or stay with Intel cpu's which is illegal.
Reply to this comment
AMD will always have a niche market to fall back on
by wazzledoozle June 28, 2005 11:40 PM PDT
Gamers.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
EarthLink ditches Philly Wi-Fi network
Craigslist files lawsuit against eBay
A reminder of why Microsoft wanted Yahoo
Online ads showing signs of economic wear?
Facebook pulls 'stalker list' tool
Most Popular Stories
Welcome to the social mess?
HP in talks to buy EDS
HP to acquire EDS for $13.9 billion
Mac Office sales soar on Apple's gains
Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Intel (0.51%) 0.12 23.76
Advanced Micro Devices (0.42%) 0.03 7.19
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.34%) -44.13 12,832.18
S&P 500 (-0.04%) -0.54 1,403.04
NASDAQ (0.27%) 6.63 2,495.12
CNET TECH (-0.06%) -0.99 1,744.82
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
Click Here
On CHOW: Does drinking ice water burn calories?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: