- Related Stories
-
Bush defends spy program after new disclosure
May 11, 2006 -
NSA spying comes under legal, political attack
April 27, 2006 -
EFF reaches out to D.C. with new office
April 27, 2006 -
Yahoo on NSA surveillance: No comment
February 15, 2006 -
Gonzales: NSA may tap 'ordinary' Americans' e-mail
February 6, 2006 -
Some companies helped the NSA, but which?
February 6, 2006 -
AT&T sued over NSA spy program
January 31, 2006 -
Editing tips from the NSA
January 24, 2006 -
Bush allies defend NSA surveillance
January 24, 2006
In a sign that political opposition to surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency may be growing, a wide range of top Democrats took aim at the program throughout the day and called for immediate hearings to investigate the president's eavesdropping and data-mining efforts.
"We need to know what our government is doing in its activities that spy upon Americans," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. "The Republican-controlled Congress has failed in its oversight responsibilities to the American people."
Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, vowed to force executives from AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth to show up at a hearing and answer questions about what data they quietly handed over to the NSA without court approval. USA Today reported on Thursday that those three companies had voluntarily opened their databases to the NSA, while Qwest refused.
Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, wrote his colleagues on the Senate Commerce Committee asking for a parallel set of hearings--in closed session, if necessary--that would require those three chief executives to explain "the role of the phone companies in this program."
During a hastily arranged press conference at the White House this morning, Bush defended the data-mining as perfectly legal and necessary to thwart terrorism. "We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans," Bush said. "Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda and their known affiliates. So far we've been very successful in preventing another attack on our soil."
It wasn't immediately clear how many other GOP members would break ranks and support more hearings. Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, warned his colleagues not to rush to judgment on the latest revelations, which said that the three phone companies had divulged records of the calling histories of hundreds of millions of Americans--but not the actual content of the conversations.
One hearing in the House of Representatives, for instance, was supposed to focus on the privacy of Social Security numbers. But Democrats used it as a platform to criticize the president, while the panel's Republican members remained silent.
"We've entered a time where consumers' rights and privacy are for sale, and as it turns out, the government may be the best customer," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Illinois Democrat. According to Rep. Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, the news represented "another telecom merger between NSA and AT&T."
"We've got a new slogan for the AT&T and NSA: Reach out and tap someone," Markey said, drawing laughter from fellow Democrats and their aides. Markey added, more seriously, that the nation has reached "a point of privacy crisis."
Other House Democrats, including Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, on Thursday introduced what they called the Lawful Intelligence and Surveillance of Terrorists in an Emergency by NSA, or the Listen Act. It specifies that covert attempts to spy on Americans or collect telephone and e-mail records must be approved by a court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Bush's difficult political position
The new revelations could be politically damaging to the Bush administration because the president has repeatedly stressed that the NSA spy program is aimed only at intercepting phone conversations and e-mail messages where one party to the conversation was outside the United States. In January, for instance, Bush assured Americans that "one end of the communication must be outside the United States."
A New York Times/CBS News poll published Wednesday put Bush's approval rating at a new low of 31 percent, the third-lowest of any president in the last 50 years.
USA Today reported the three phone companies had divulged "call detail records," which are database entries that record the parties to the conversation, the length of the call, and so on. It wasn't clear whether only names or names and phone numbers were turned over to the NSA.
A CNET News.com survey published in February asked telecommunications carriers whether they "turned over information or opened up their networks to the NSA without being compelled by law." Neither Verizon nor AT&T would answer yes or no to that question.
But BellSouth did answer in the negative at the time. A BellSouth representative on Thursday said he could not explain the discrepancy, and provided News.com with a statement saying: "BellSouth does not provide any confidential customer information to the NSA or any governmental agency without proper legal authority." The statement did not elaborate on what "proper legal authority" might be, and whether it would encompass a mere request from the White House.
Complicating the situation for the White House is the pending Senate confirmation of Michael Hayden, who was at the helm of the NSA when the surveillance program was created and was nominated by Bush last week to be the new CIA head.
Senate Democrats pledged to use those confirmation hearings as a means to get their questions answered. They will be "an opportunity to explore this and other vital issues regarding the effectiveness of our intelligence community," said Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. "Hayden must demonstrate a willingness to be forthcoming with the Congress and present a strategy to address the systemic problems facing our intelligence community."
CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Telephony
Government
United States
Privacy
AT&T (formerly BellSouth)
AT&T
Qwest Communications International
Verizon Communications
See more CNET content tagged:
NSA,
Democrat,
Edward Markey,
hearing,
BellSouth Corp.


This smacks of Watergate - except that they are spying on us all.
It's time for a change. And, no, I don't mean Democrats.
We need more fundamental changes. Like 2 term limits on ALL elected officials. If it's good enough for the President, its good enough for all.
This would reduce the ability to create "good ol' boy" networks (no matter which side of the aisle they are built on). And, it would make the lawmakers simplify laws and lawmaking.
But, the lawmakers would have to vote on this, and who really thinks they'll vote themselves out of thier cushy jobs and self-approved raises in the midst of economic recessions?
Aren't you tired of politics as usual? Don't you see what more government gets us? It's less freedom and less money in our own pockets. And wars based on suspicion and hype - not facts and evidence.
They tax the working people to death and use that tax money to spy on the workers. Just how sick is that?
I'm an independent voter....but I'd have to say I lean more towwards the Libertarian camp.
What have we got to lose by going Libertarian? The Republicans and Democrats are just two sides of the same coin.
I, for one, am tired of flipping this coin.
The privacy issues here cannot be underestimated. If government agencies can tell who calls whom, how big a stretch is it for this information to be used to determine what a person's political leanings are. Imagine a person that keeps their political feelings close to their chest being denied a job in the government due to their friendships with more vocal individuals, exposed through phone records. This is the tip of the iceberg - financial records, Internet-access histories, travel records, etc.
I hope America still hasn't been so defeated by fear that it can't stand up against this.
The privacy issues here cannot be underestimated. If government agencies can tell who calls whom, how big a stretch is it for this information to be used to determine what a person's political leanings are. Imagine a person that keeps their political feelings close to their chest being denied a job in the government due to their friendships with more vocal individuals, exposed through phone records. This is the tip of the iceberg - financial records, Internet-access histories, travel records, etc.
I hope America still hasn't been so defeated by fear that it can't stand up against this.
Your true (partisan) colors are showing... again.
God forbid WHEN or if the next Al Kaida attack occurs in the
good old USA with a weapon that will make 9-11 look like a
picnic, we won't be arguing over this unfortunate necessity
(privacy invasion). We'll be demanding the president fight back -
as he is now.
I hate giving up my privacy, but it's the price we all must pay
post 9-11. Al Kaida are brainwashed fanatics and they want to
kill our families, in large numbers. Get it Liberals? Get REAL.
That info is being pattern matched against known suspect numbers. Is that important? Oh biy you betcha.
If you go back and look at how 9-11 was organized, it was done over the phone. Had a system such as this been in place prior to that horrific terrorist attack, it might have been prevented.
But don't let facts color your judgement. If you're angry over this, definitely write your congressperson and demand that the process be stopped at once. Then, after it is, and we experience another 9-11 (and we will), you can write your congressperson again and demand to know why the President didn't connect the dots.
"terrorism," they can do whatever they please. The average Joe
will buy into anything that is passed off as a way to "thwart the
bad guys." Bush and company like for the public to fear the
Boogeyman and seek protection behind their skirt.
The subtext of these domestic surveillance programs is this:
"Don't be critical or get in our way. Either you are a patriotic
American and on our side, or you're with the enemy.
Incidentally, we've amassed quite a database about your
personal life and habits. Let's see...in 2003, you phoned an
escort service. And what's this Internet search about how to
avoid taxes?"
The details of the foiling of the evildoers will not be fully released, because that is classified and would compromise security, but you can be sure it was foiled by increased vigilance.
- Poor analysis
-
by smoyerjx
May 11, 2006 11:13 PM PDT
- You guys should have been good techies and pointed out this USA Today story is simply a anonymously sourced rehash of the original James Risen story that broke in the Times last December.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>The irony is techie folks should be the first to discuss the myth of privacy in an electronic world where everything is logged.
Y'all missed it.
Spy Agency Mined Vast Data Trove, Officials Report
NYT December 24, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/24/politics/24spy.html?ei=5090&en=016edb46b79bde83&ex=1293080400&pagewanted=print