Australia's porn-blocking plan unveiled

Australian Prime Minister John Howard has announced a plan by the country's Coalition political parties to clean up Internet porn, in an effort to woo Christian voters.

Protecting Australian Families Online program, which will cost $160 million, is under the auspices of NetAlert, Australia?s Internet safety advisory body. The program will kick in August 20 and include a package of measures that the government says will help parents protect their children from online dangers.

Howard announced the slew of changes last week in a joint Webcast with opposition leader Kevin Rudd, broadcast to 770 churches and watched by an estimated 100,000 Christians.

The lion's share of the cash--$71.8 million--will go into a filtering program offered to individual homes and public libraries. Parents will be able to choose either to install filtering software on their home PCs or to request a "clean" connection from their service provider, which will be responsible for blocking pornographic content at the ISP level.

The government will post a list of approved filtering software providers on its Web site and mandate that all sanctioned vendors update their products as the threat landscape changes.

While individual filters will be available beginning later this month, ISP-level blocking may take some time to implement. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is currently planning a trial of ISP-level filtering in Tasmania that will inform the government's decision on a national launch.

The federal government has already examined the potential ISP-level filtering three times, starting in 1999.

Following the most recent trial, Coonan acknowledged problems with the concept saying: "Each report has found significant problems with content filter products operating at the ISP-level...The Australian trials have also found the effect on performance of the Internet by ISP filtering to be substantial and a lack of scalability of the filters to larger ISPs."

NetAlert's Protecting Australian Families Online program will also see publicity campaigns stepped up, including an $18.6 million awareness scheme to "inform parents and (caretakers) of children about online safety issues and provide information about where they can go to receive support and assistance", and 10 new ACMA Internet safety officers who will visit schools to talk about online dangers.

More "Web police" will be added to the Online Child Sex Exploitation Team, which will receive a $36.8 million cash injection to pay 36 new hires in 2007-08, rising to a total of 90 in 2009-10. The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions will also receive a funding boost to cope with the expected increase in prosecutions resulting from the additional Web police.

Other changes include an extension of the ACMA Blacklist, which includes pornography denied classification by regulators, to cover malicious software and terror sites.

The plan comes in addition to a previously announced government initiatives to curb online pornography. Communications Minister Helen Coonan first unveiled the plan to launch content filters last year, although the program has been beset with delays since then.

Coonan welcomed last week's announcement, saying in a statement: "Unfortunately, no single measure alone can protect children from online harm and, in fact, traditional parenting skills have never been more important."

Jo Best of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Down Under

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Internet service providers

RSS feed

Censorship

RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Tasmania, porn, Australia, home PC, children

40 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Isn't that illegal?
by thedreaming August 13, 2007 11:33 AM PDT
I know Australia isn't he US and they have different laws, but is it really legal for the government to mandate that commercial isp install porn filters? Isn't this a job better suited to parents? I've never seen a child search for or receive porn when their parent is sitting right there next to them. It just doesn't happen. Doesn't it make more sense to let the parents be the parents and keep the goverment and big business out of the home?
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
When did Australia become China?
by R. U. Sirius August 13, 2007 12:06 PM PDT
This story is unbelievable. I thought Australia was a free country. Wow, it sounds like it is becoming China.
Reply to this comment View reply
Good idea, that is bound to fail
by rcrusoe August 13, 2007 12:18 PM PDT
IMO, we use one of the best internet filters available and I am constantly having to make changes to allow access to legitimate sites. Normal sites get blocked and objectionable sites get through. And it isn't hard, if you know what you are doing, to bypass filters entirely. Filters don't work.
Reply to this comment View reply
The end of freedom...
by Hoser McMoose August 13, 2007 1:25 PM PDT
The end of freedom and democracy always starts with the best of intentions. Who doesn't want to 'protect the children' and 'fight the evils of child pornography', or even protect us from those 'evil terrorists'? Obviously we all do, but at what point do the ends no longer justify the means? When do a government's efforts to "protect" us become worse than the dangers from which we're being protected? Installing mandatory, government-issued filters to limit free thought on the Internet is a DANGEROUS activity, one that Australians should be extremely wary of, even if the proposal only calls for blocking out porn. As the initial filters fail miserably in their designed task the choice will have to be made to scrap the idea or to make the filters MUCH more draconian. Protecting the children of our world may well be the most noble cause out there, but that does not mean one should blindly accept a proposal just because it purports to do so!
Reply to this comment
Australia's Porn-Blocking Plan
by kevinbwalker August 13, 2007 1:48 PM PDT
What's truly obscene is the political pandering to right-wing religious fanatics. Filters block far more content than you would expect, and it is the off-line actions that are taken by ignorant people (frequently illegal behavior), not web content that causes harm to people. Nobody ever died from reading a book or looking at a picture or movie. Usually, it is because they did something off-line.
Reply to this comment
Porn, Porn, Porn...
by rturner2 August 13, 2007 3:55 PM PDT
I am against stopping, especially kids, being exposed to porn, however, parents can already purchase filters and put them on their computers. The plan for ISPs to provide "clean" connections is a joke, as well as this funding to provide ALL parents with filters... over half will not install the software, understand how to configure it etc. An an Australian, this is a waste of public money. I am against porn, however, I am also against election-year, policy-on-the-run decisions.
Reply to this comment View reply
Porn, Porn, Porn - huh
by Gonzo BobH August 13, 2007 4:01 PM PDT
ME: I quote your comment. YOU: Reader post by: rturner2 Posted on: August 13, 2007, 3:55 PM PDT I am against stopping, especially kids, being exposed to porn... ME: Don't think this is exactly what you meant to say. Or are you really against stopping kids being exposed to porn. Hmmmm.
Reply to this comment View reply
Filtering Folly
by Schratboy August 13, 2007 7:54 PM PDT
No matter how much the authorities try to prevent the nasty content they'll never achieve 100% blocking. The nature of Web filters is based on trying to block well-known URL and domains. However, the trend is to aggregate content from various sites making tracking the offensive content almost impossible. You may as well take th 170 million dollars and spent it on user education rather that pouring it down the Web filter hole year and after year.
Reply to this comment
Good in theory.
by ralfthedog August 13, 2007 11:34 PM PDT
If the ISP level filtration is voluntary (for the customer) it is a good thing. If you make it mandatory, this would be very bad. In the early days of the commercial internet, my company started being blocked by a number of porn filters. After some research, I found out that it was because we shared an IP address with a porn site. later we moved to our own server, however we were blocked by an anti spam filter. Why? because we use Server Beach. The anti spam company did not like Server Beaches TOS, so they labeled all Server Beach customers as spammers. This is now fixed, but it shows that filters can be dangerous.
Reply to this comment View reply
Idiots...
by KiraiAnca August 14, 2007 4:09 AM PDT
Doesn't the government notice how sex offenses dropped with porn being readily available? Sheesh. I'd personally much rather have assorted rapists fap themselves silly at home, in front of their monitors, than doing the alternative. And why would the Christians care either way?! Their Bible pretty much said /not/ to judge anything, that being God's job.
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
RIM unveils BlackBerry Bold/BlackBerry 9000
HelioVolt claims CIGS solar efficiency mark
Virtual worlds for pre-schoolers? They're here
Powerset brings the Semantic Web to Wikipedia
Flaw turns Gmail into spamming machine
Most Popular Stories
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Did you get infected? Virus runs amok amid JavaOne
Resource center from News.com sponsors
Same great protection. Reengineered for speed.
Norton Internet Security™2008

Click Here!
Norton still delivers award-winning protection and now uses 83% less memory and scans 48% faster than the competitor average. Get a FREE trial today!

Click Here!
Norton Beats the Competition

See how Norton Internet Security™2008 uses less memory, while scanning and booting faster than the competitor average.

Norton Protection Blog

Read the latest from our security experts as they help protect people from evolving online threats.

Protect Your Bluetooth Connection

Don't let fraudsters sink their teeth into your Bluetooth connection.

Vishing - What you need to know

Meet the latest ID theft scam: Voice Phishing.

Take Norton for a Test Drive Today!

Act now to get your FREE trial of Norton Internet Security 2008.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.94%) -120.90 12,745.88
S&P 500 (-0.67%) -9.40 1,388.28
NASDAQ (-0.23%) -5.72 2,445.52
CNET TECH (-0.64%) -11.13 1,724.28
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On TechRepublic: 10 ways users mess up their computers
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: