Bye-bye hard drive, hello flash

The world as notebook users know it is about to change in a flash.

Manufacturers of NAND flash memory say they will expand the market for their chips over the next few years and colonize devices that now rely on hard drives or other types of memory. In turn, this could mean phones that can record several hours of video, or smaller notebooks with twice or more the battery life.

The NAND noise will be particularly strong at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) this week in Las Vegas, with manufacturers showing off the solid-state technology as an increasingly important component in cell phones and talking up how it will find its way into notebook hard drives in 2006.

News.context

What's new:
Flash memory is on track for an ever larger role in gear like cell phones and notebook computers.

Bottom line:
Hard drives may have a cost advantage as a way to store data, but they're bulky, take longer to start up and use more energy. Plus, flash prices are dropping.

More stories on flash memory

By about the turn of the decade, NAND could even replace hard drives entirely in some mini notebooks because of the increasing amount of data the chips can hold, according to Steve Appleton, CEO of Micron Technology, one of the world's largest memory makers. Flash also takes up less space and uses less energy.

"The average notebook has 30GB (of hard drive storage). How long is it before the notebook has solid state memory? Five or six years," he said. "I'm not saying drives will go away. There will always be a need for storage, but when was the last time you tapped out a drive?"

Jim Handy, an analyst at Semico Research, says NAND won't replace notebook hard drives as long as Microsoft keeps expanding the number of storage-heavy features in its software, but it will become standard in video cameras, displacing tape, recordable DVDs and mini drives. Flash-based cameras, already a staple in Japan, are smaller, and the cost premium associated with the chips can be hidden in a $500 camera.

"Video is not a hard-drive area. I expect it will go with flash," Handy said.

NAND flash will also begin to appear in car navigation systems and play a role in large data storage systems at corporations and government agencies in the relatively near future, said Jon Kang, senior vice president of Samsung Electronics' technical marketing group. Kang's enthusiasm is understandable: Samsung is the world's largest maker of NAND in terms of bits shipped.

"It is really creating a boon in consumer applications," he said.

As with many other technologies before it, costs are coming down as capacities are heading up.

The NAND evolution fits the pattern established in Moore's Law, which states that the number of transistors on a given chip will double every two years. Doubling the number of transistors on a memory chip allows manufacturers to put more memory cells on it.

chart

Actually, the technology is moving a little faster than Moore's Law. A few years ago, NAND got produced on trailing-edge manufacturing lines. Now manufacturers are putting it on their cutting-edge processes. The shift has thus accelerated product development.

Currently, NAND chips double in memory density every year. The cutting-edge 4-gigabit chips of 2005, for example, will soon be dethroned by 8-gigabit chips. (Memory chips are measured in gigabits, or Gb, but consumer electronics manufacturers talk about how many gigabytes, or GB, are in their products. Eight gigabits make a gigabyte, so one 8Gb chip is the equivalent of 1GB.)

Another driving factor in the uptake of the technology is cost: NAND drops in price about 35 to 45 percent a year, due in part--again--to Moore's Law and in part to the fact that many companies are bringing on new factories. 1GB of flash costs a consumer electronics manufacturer about $45, said Handy. That will drop to $30 in next year, $20 in 2008 and $9 by 2009.

CONTINUED: Faster boot-up...
Page 1 | 2
More from News.com on this story's topics

CES

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Memory

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Notebooks and tablets

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Cell phones

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Storage

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Processors

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
NAND, Micron Technology Inc., NAND flash, notebook computer, flash memory

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 30 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Why are transfer rates ALWAYS ignored?
by JLBer January 4, 2006 11:32 AM PST
Frankly, the whole idea of storage costs dropping as technology improves is NOT new. This has been happening since the days of 16 KB of RAM costing $1,200 for the TRS-80. So hearding that a GB of RAM will cost $9 in 2009 is as much of a shock as hearing that a ten year old video card can't run "Half-Life 2". But I'm really getting tired of cost per megabyte always being the factor when these "Flash memory will replace hard drives" stories come about. At the rate Microsoft and the other software vendors continue to bloat their software, even having 16 GB of RAM probably won't be enough in 2009. That's going to require a hell of a lot of flash memory bandwidth to make its use efficient and thus far flash memory has never been able to hold a candle to hard drives with respect to speed and I doubt that it will change any time soon. I'm sure that flash memory bandwidth will improve over time. But hard drive speeds will increase as well. If history is any indicator, this might work for entry and mid-level systems, but that's about it. To read the article, you'd almost think that everything smaller than mid to enterprise level servers could get rid of hard drives.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
flash drives will never catch up to hard drive capacity
by lingsun January 4, 2006 12:58 PM PST
Flash drives will never catch up to hard drive capacity. Are we going to see 500gb flash drives at the same time as 500gb notebook hard drives? I seriously doubt it. Right now I could get a 1gb flash drive for my Compaq LTE 5400, which is a 9 year old laptop with a 1.3 gb hard drive. It's good to see that flash drives are about to pass the hard drive capacity of 9 year old laptops!!
Reply to this comment
What about durability?
by mbednar January 4, 2006 2:03 PM PST
While flash drives have an advantage in speed and power savings, the limit to the number of times that a given cell can be re-written is troubling. I can imagine that from swap file operations alone that wearing out a flash drive would happen in pretty short order. Don't even get me started about temp files. :-)
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
performance as well as economics
by January 4, 2006 2:32 PM PST
This article is shortsighted in as much as it only speculates on the economics of the decision and ignores engineering considerations, such as: access times (advantage hard drives) transfer rates (advantage: hard drives) power consumption (which would favor flash memory) heat dissipation (which also favors flash memory)
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Better Ways To Skin This Cat
by Stating January 4, 2006 4:06 PM PST
The lack of creativity by these engineers is apalling. They have a hammer and everything looks like a nail. Bring back the slide rule, crew cut, pocket protector guys. Here's what I would do to crack this performance/battery life equation: 1) Variable speed hard drive. The hard drive should have selectable RPM. 7500 RPM or better when plugged into AC. 2500, 3500, or 4500 depending on users' choice of performance vs. battery life. For a lot of tasks, the HD doesn't need to spin as fast, and you can make use of deferred writes. 2) Buffer HD to RAM. I've got 700 meg of RAM on my laptop. Windows should give me the option to buffer several hundred megs off the HD to RAM for read-only operations. I just watched a 2 hour MPEG movie on my last flight. Why couldn't 20-30 minutes have been buffered to RAM and then the HD powered down? That is just stupid. 3) Faster bootup. Ever heard of Windows Hibernate to disk? You can shutdown in 1-2 minutes and power back up in about the same amount of time and resume your work right where you left off.
Reply to this comment
Eventually but a long ways down the road
by pjonesCET January 4, 2006 4:45 PM PST
Noted the coment from the person when was the last time you tapped out a Hard drives capacity. With the Macintosh gone to UNIX, and I am sure Mr Gates will have itfinally hit him in the head that UNIX or Linux is they way to go (if for no reason than to make it hard for all these security problems Windows has); software will get Larger and larger and Larger and more complex because UNIX tell the Machine "everything to do" where previously the Processors had a lot of the code burnt in. I can remeberr in the not to didstat past when I bought a 150mb Hard drive and thought I'd never run out, then just two years later I bought a 500mb Hard drive. My Current machine came with a 30 gb Drive. I added a 120Gb Drive for OSX. I've now surpassed the amount of space in that entire original hard drive and then some on my 120GB drive (I've used up about 45GB and I've oly had the addition drive since I installed OSX.2. If they can get 1 Terabyte Flash drives (and above) out for the price of or less of 120gb Drives now, maybe. But that's way down the road.
Reply to this comment
Cost comparison HDD to flash
by Rbohn January 4, 2006 4:49 PM PST
Let me add to the other skeptical comments. A standard reference on cost/performance of hard disk drives and other forms of storage is Ed Grochowski's graphs, http:// www.hitachigst.com/hdd/hddpdf/tech/ hdd_technology2003.pdf. See page 3. The article shows flash costs falling from $45/GB to $9 per GB by 2009. Over this period, Grochowski's data suggests HDD storage costs will go from $1/GB to below $.10/GB. The two-order-of-magnitude cost gap between semiconductors and magnetic storage is actually increasing. Flash will continue to do well in specific applications where unit cost must be below $200, or small size is critical, but in the forseeable future it won't displace HDDs in full-function laptop computers.
Reply to this comment
It could happen...
by No_Man January 5, 2006 5:12 PM PST
First, to all those who have been ripping this article to shreds, let me point out the final quote: "Sam Bhavnani at Current Analysis said most consumers will continue to want big hard drives, but still, he added, "some high-end ultraportables could go that way"--to flash--"in a few years."" High-end ultraportables. Not your run-of-the-mill $1000-or- less laptop. Read the article before you crap your pants (and all over this discussion). Second, I actually think some of these predictions may be understated. Last year, for the first time ever, laptops outsold PCs, and the trend shows that sales margin to increase every year. Additionally, processors and optical drives are becoming more power consuming every generation. When you start talking about fuel cell based laptop batteries (as many analysts have) then you know something has to give. That creates a lot of pressure on the NAND manufacturers to decrease production costs and increase R&D. The article here stated that the cost per GB is dropping at a rate of 35%-45% per year. I honstely think we'll see that increase to a drop of 55%-65% per year. $9 per GB in 2009? Try $3-$4 per GB. $1,080 for a 120GB NAND may be absurd, but $400 sure ain't... especially when it comes with perks like a superfast boot time and ultra low power consumption.
Reply to this comment
The innovator dilemma
by Hoedic January 6, 2006 7:17 AM PST
In the book "The innovator dilemma", Christensen studies the memory industry (mostly hard drive) and how we went from 11" HDD to 2.5". It's a very interesting study about innovation and dominant designs for a given industry. Each new design of HDD started on a specific market segment where it slowly became competitive with the previous techno (the new design is usually less competitive at the beginnning : more expensive, less capacity, but grows faster). Then, the new design moves to new market segments and kills the previous players. It wouldn't be surprising to see flash cards replacing HDD more and more. This goes with a trend of getting pieces thats are sleeker and that have a better energetic efficience (Intel shows the path)
Reply to this comment
8 gb = 1 gb false
by kb9vgr January 6, 2006 7:59 AM PST
i thought 1 gb = 1gb 8 bits = 1 byte 1million bytes = 1MB 1000MB =1GB 1000GB= 1TB BUT 1GB=1GB AND im sure that laptop hard drives will be alot bigger by then
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Next Photoshop could come in small packages
A new Apple rumor--and why we're reporting it
Google Earth app shows climate change effects
LinkedIn soars as MySpace, Club Penguin waddle
Hedge fund, corporate raider backing Icahn
Most Popular Stories
Microsoft confirms Windows adheres to broadcast flag
Arthur W. Burks, early computer theorist, dies
Look out, Apple TV: The $100 Netflix Player has arrived
Apple cleaning up in $1,000-plus retail market
NBC says it inadvertently flagged 'American Gladiators'
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-1.85%) -241.49 12,786.67
S&P 500 (-1.10%) -15.69 1,410.94
NASDAQ (-1.19%) -29.97 2,486.12
CNET TECH (-1.75%) -31.22 1,750.57
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On ZDNet: Mac OS 10.5.2 = Apple Vista?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: