• On last.fm: Free iPhone/iTouch Streaming Radio App

October 22, 2007 4:19 AM PDT

Comcast says it's not blocking content, applications

Comcast says it's not blocking content, applications
Related Stories

The P2P mistake at Ohio University

May 7, 2007

FCC to study need for more Net neutrality regulation

March 22, 2007

BitTorrent to open digital-media store

February 23, 2007
Related Blogs

Comcast really does block BitTorrent traffic after all


October 19, 2007

Is Comcast's BitTorrent filtering violating the law?


September 4, 2007

Comcast denies monkeying with BitTorrent traffic


August 21, 2007

In response to news report, Comcast says bandwidth management technologies may slow a peer-to-peer service as part of what's called bandwidth shaping.

The story "Comcast says it's not blocking content, applications" published October 22, 2007 at 4:19 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 17 comments
I disagree with comcast assertions.
by inachu October 22, 2007 5:17 PM PDT
I am kicked off internet game servers such as
WORLD OF WARCRAFT
QUAKE WARS
AGE OF EMPIRES III
OUTLOOK EXPRESS times out 3 times a week.

Many times for either having low ping or lost connection.

I want to be that old lady with a hammer so bad.
Reply to this comment View reply
So what's the use of "SpeedBoost"
by chrisaroz October 22, 2007 6:07 PM PDT
So basically you can pay Comcast for high speed and get their "SpeedBoost" stuff to help download large files like movies, but you'll never actually be able to use it since they throttle back your connection when downloading large files like movies. Well done Comcast, well done.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
One AP User "Hogging?"
by jbelkin October 22, 2007 9:14 PM PDT
"hogging all the bandwidth and slowing down the experience for other users," Bannerman added."

The AP experiment was ONE user - that's "hogging" the bandwidth, what is their network - pig guts & kindling as wiring?

That excuse might make sense if the AP user was trying to download 10 HD movies ... but clearly the Comcast network is either that feeble that ONE user requires rejiggering of the Eastern seaboard?

That should be the followup - if one user is "hogging," what are two p2p users? A crash?
Reply to this comment View reply
Is it any surprise...
by zyzzy77 October 23, 2007 5:12 AM PDT
that Comcast has oversold it's network capacity? Just like the airlines, some customer traffic are going to be bumped randomly (to protect the 'common good'). C-cast had the opportunity over 10 years ago to build a fiber-to-premises network and decided to stay with coax to save some cash. Now they have HDTV, voice and data they have try to compress and push through a copper delivery technology over thats over 100 years old. No surprise that internet users will have to fly standby. Just repeat after me..... It's comcastic!
Reply to this comment
As usual story missing key point
by clumpkin October 23, 2007 5:56 AM PDT
The story points out that Net Neutrality is not a law but missed the part about HOW Comcast was allegedly blocking the Bittorrent clients. The way Bittorrent works AFAIK the two clients communicate between each other. The tests concluded that reset commands were sent to both clients but were not FROM the other client. Basically someone between the two clients impersonated the clients and sent bogus data to the clients. That is not blocking that is hijacking and possible fraud. Both of which are most definitely illegal.
Reply to this comment
Good for Comcast! I don't want thieves slowing my connection!!
by WJeansonne October 23, 2007 7:04 AM PDT
It figures a liberal news organization to side with bandwith (and intellectual property) thieves. I hope Comcast, ATT and other backbone providers choke off the air supply to Bit Torrent hosted sites. Has anyone visited or researched Web sites that utilize Bit Torrent's technology? They are packed with stolen software and movies!!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
So....
by zyzzy77 October 23, 2007 8:33 AM PDT
What part of "unlimited" don't you understand? I'll accept bandwidth limits (err sorry, "traffic shaping") if they tell me what they are in advance, and I can pay accordingly. How much usage is too much? Which applications are off-limits?
Reply to this comment
You pay for a service that...
by Heebee Jeebies October 23, 2007 8:57 AM PDT
is charged for by the upload and download speed you want. Now if providing this speed to their customers is not doable then Comcast and any other ISP that charges based on how fast the upload and download speed is is perpetrating a fraud on their customers who expect to get the upload and download speed they are paying for.

Also, since you pay for upload and download speed and not buy how much you upload or download you should be able to use that upload and download speed for whatever you want even if because their system chokes on it.

No Comcast and many others just want you to pay them the big bucks and then buzz off. They want your money but don't want to provide you with what you are paying for.

Robert
Reply to this comment View reply
I'd bet on it smarta**!
by WJeansonne October 23, 2007 2:07 PM PDT
Really, really really, really. LOL.
Reply to this comment
On my end, Comcast is also limiting access to att.com
by DMAN3k October 23, 2007 5:29 PM PDT
I can't even check my phone bills without disconnecting.

I pretty sure it's not a coincidence either. I can repeat it anytime. Let me check on that now.

Yup. It took about 40 seconds to get reconnected again.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right