Newsmaker: Debating the morality behind software development

newsmaker In the long history of software development--let's loosely mark the starting point around the time of the ENIAC--code writers have dealt with a myriad of technical and business challenges. It's fair to say they've also not had to confront questions of morality or ethics about how governments later deploy their finished work.

Until now.

Grady Booch, the inventor of the Unified Modeling Language, says those days of splendid isolation are--and should be--coming to an end.

Booch was the first chief scientist at Rational Software when it began in 1981. He kept the job after IBM bought the company in 2003 when he was also elevated to the rank of IBM fellow.

Maybe it's the freedom that comes with possessing a small fortune or perhaps it's just in his DNA to make waves, but Booch relishes the "voice in the wilderness" mantle--both inside and outside of the technology world's largest corporation. CNET News.com spoke with Booch about his ideas concerning software and ethics during a recent swing he made out to the West Coast.

Q: You've gone on record talking about this question of morality in software. I didn't think one could classify software as moral or immoral. What's behind your thinking?
Booch: Even though what we're doing is deeply technical stuff, there are ethical, moral implications about what we do. And it's not just in our sciences--look at the struggles the physicists of the '40s and '50s had dealing with their ability to unlock the secrets of the universe.

Even though what we're doing is deeply technical stuff, there are ethical, moral implications about what we do. And it's not just in our sciences--look at the struggles the physicists of the '40s and '50s had dealing with their ability to unlock the secrets of the universe.

You're talking about nuclear power?
Booch: I'm talking about nuclear power and not just nuclear power, but also nuclear weapons and the like. It's our ability to unlock these secrets of the universe for either good or bad.

And so?
And so there were great discussions then--and even today--to the effect that I may have the ability to do these things, but should I do these things? The same thing is true in software systems.

But those are technical issues, then.
Booch: They're not.

But they don't have anything to do with morality.
Booch: I'm leading up to where the morality issue goes up this (development) ladder. It's the place where it's not just a matter of whether we can build or want to build but also the question of whether we should build.

Here's an example. London's installing more video cameras per square mile on the street than anybody else. All right, not a lot of software there. But what happens when they couple that with facial recognition software so I can actually track individuals as they go through the city?

But that's not a question that the software developer gets presented with. That's something for the city of London to consider based upon its needs.
Booch: Yes, but at the ultimate level, the software developer can say, "Do I want to actually build a system that potentially could violate human rights?"

What software developer do you know actually thinks about that when he or she sits down at the keyboard?
Booch: I know many. There is a group called Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility where many of its members think about that kind of thing. That group was formed to deal with the social issues of the developers. Do I as a developer, coming fresh out of college, decide to go work for someplace in Silicon Valley working on a benign business application? Or do I work for some defense contractor? So that's a moral decision that a person has to make to use his or her skills.

For the sake of argument, I also could say that while Google is a for-profit corporation, it's been involved in China and some people have raised questions in connection with the company's policies. So when some freshly minted engineering candidate out of Berkeley decides where to apply for a job, does Google then get put on par with the military as far as these moral questions are concerned?
Booch: That's a decision that person has to make. The issues you raise are philosophical ones. Let's say I'm working on some bit of software that enables sort of a social networking kind of thing that enables connectivity among people and there's potential for the exposure of lots of information. Well, do I then add a particular feature realizing it may have a coolness factor. But at the same time I may just have found a way that pedophiles can get into this network more easily.

More Newsmakers

More from News.com on this story's topics

Programming

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Business ethics

Create an email alert | RSS feed

IBM

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Grady Booch, nuclear power, implication, ethics, software development

22 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Horrible Interview, Charles
by projectnation October 15, 2007 10:45 AM PDT
I hardly ever post on here but just cannot stand it when a reporter get so belligerent with their guest. Wish I got paid to ask questions like "And so?". Anyway, great idea horrible interview.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
The EULA is about as immoral as you can get...
by Zimm2 October 15, 2007 11:19 AM PDT
Morality issues start way before you start thinking about how software is used. Just look at the average EULA; the customer is screwed no matter how bad the software is... The average developer doesn't even stand behind his or her product. That's were I believe this discussion needs to start!
Reply to this comment
ivory tower
by baike October 15, 2007 11:26 AM PDT
Come back to reality. This is such an ivory tower discussion. Booch and his buddies have the time and money to contemplate 'should I', while the average developer in the US is scared his job is going overseas. Do you really believe that a developer in the US will say no to any work, when there are a billion Indians who will do the same work at half the rate (or less)? Also, Booch sounds pretty high on developers, as if they're turning lead to gold or something. Does he realize that whatever we code a machine to do, a person can already do? The only advantage the machine brings is speed and scale.
Reply to this comment
Your fellowship has been revoked!
by bvdon October 15, 2007 1:37 PM PDT
How did this guy get to be an IBM Fellow? His philosophy on software morality is not very well thought out and he is putting too much responsibility on the programmer and not the business person driving the project. What world does this guy live in?
Reply to this comment View reply
If developer A doesn't want to build it..
by basraw October 15, 2007 1:55 PM PDT
1) If developer A doesn't want to build it.. Developer B will and developer B will get paid while A goes hungry. "But that's not a question that the software developer gets presented with. That's something for the city of London to consider based upon its needs. Booch: Yes, but at the ultimate level, the software developer can say, "Do I want to actually build a system that potentially could violate human rights?""
Reply to this comment
I was only following orders...
by wildthought October 15, 2007 2:29 PM PDT
I am not suprised by the comments that feel it should not be a programmers responsibility to think about what they are building and its impact on society. I am however dismayed. Taken to its extreme we the people who made and installed the gas chambers (pretend they were independant contractors) were very much morraly responsible for the deaths that occurred in the holocaust. Do we really want to live in a society where the government can and does track our individual movement through software? We of all people know how close that Orwellian nightmare is to beocoming technologically feasible. It is one thing to be aplotical and not care, it is quite another level of immorality to participate in the erosion of our civil liverties and that of others. Go Grady!
Reply to this comment
If Hitler or ToJo had the bomb...
by lkrupp October 15, 2007 3:16 PM PDT
Read the book Hiroshima Day One. The American physicists did indeed discuss moral issues as to the building of the first atomic bomb. All one has to do is imagine if those scientists had come to the conclusion that the bomb should not be constructed and had refused to do further work. Both Nazi Germany and Japan had bomb projects and would have built one sooner or later. And of not them then some other despot down the line. Where might we be if that had happened? The whole interview was an exercise in futility and wrong headed thinking. If developer A doesn't add the feature being morally debated then developer B WILL add it. Developer A can do nothing to prevent it other than run off at the mouth. Splitting the atom, cloning a human being or building a computer, once the genie is out of the bottle moral arguments mean nothing. The best one can hope for is to control the issue through regulation or negotiation.
Reply to this comment View reply
Why not question the morality of Google helping to oppress Chinese?
by lingsun October 15, 2007 3:32 PM PDT
What they've done should be a crime.
Reply to this comment View reply
morality
by spothannah October 16, 2007 4:55 AM PDT
Read Kierkegaard. Do your best. Nobody here gets out alive. Love.
Reply to this comment
Morality and ethics are relative
by R.Jefferson October 16, 2007 9:09 AM PDT
The logic a business uses as opposed to a person is very different. A person may be a thoughtful and principled person on a human to human level. A business is principled in making money. The transactions that occur are between an impersonal group (a business) and a consumer (a person), so there?s no meaningful human interaction taking place. The profit motive is the guiding principle of the business world and morality and ethics are in direct conflict with the profit motive.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Barriers to solar energy's blockbuster promise
Refunds for Powerbook, iBook power adapters
Virus runs amok amid JavaOne
Firefox add-on infected with Trojan
Citi: Solar prices to sink rapidly
Most Popular Stories
Can any game break the 'GTA IV' sales records?
Photos: HTC's Touch Diamond phone
Gates: Vista is doing just fine
Photos: Cracking open the Nintendo Wii Remote
A modest proposal to fix Dell's customer service
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You can do more when your phone runs Windows®
Windows Mobile

See it all at StartDoingMore.com Start Doing More

Start doing more
Get More Done with Windows Mobile

There's so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. StartDoingMore.com>

Familiar Microsoft Software and Services

With a Windows Mobile phone, your easy-to-use Microsoft software go wherever you go.

Choose the perfect phone for you

Side, flip, qwerty, touchscreen? See More>

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

IBM (-0.61%) -0.76 124.16
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.96%) -123.18 12,743.60
S&P 500 (-0.81%) -11.29 1,386.39
NASDAQ (-0.48%) -11.77 2,439.47
CNET TECH (-0.68%) -11.82 1,723.59
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On CHOW: Does drinking ice water burn calories?
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: