Digital TV switch set for early 2009

It's almost official: Starting Feb. 18, 2009, millions of televisions in American households will go black unless they're outfitted to receive all-digital broadcasts.

The deadline became final on Wednesday as part of a broader spending bill that the U.S. Senate approved by an ultra-thin margin. Stuck in a deadlock over proposals involving Medicaid and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, the legislation earned approval only after Vice President Dick Cheney flew back from a Middle East trip to push the 50-50 vote over the edge.

The 2009 deadline will not affect the vast majority of Americans who already subscribe to cable or satellite TV. But households relying on an antenna to receive "over-the-air" analog broadcasts must acquire a digital tuner to continue receiving TV shows.

The Senate's action effectively ends months of debate and solidifies a compromise politicians made this weekend with the U.S. House of Representatives. Earlier versions of the Senate bill had called for an April 7, 2009 deadline, while the House had pushed for Dec. 31, 2008, as the cutoff date.

By the time of the 2009 switch, the government will have auctioned the remaining spectrum to companies interested in deploying wireless technologies. The proceeds are estimated at about $10 billion by the Congressional Budget Office. The auction is supposed to begin no later than Jan. 7, 2008.

Wednesday's vote won immediate praise from the technology industry, which sees the imminent auction as a breeding ground for business opportunities.

"It's just about the best Christmas present that I can think of coming to the tech sector from the public policy process," said Janice Obuchowski, executive director of the High Tech DTV Coalition, a group of 19 trade associations and technology companies including AT&T, Dell, Cisco Systems, IBM, Intel, Microsoft and Texas Instruments. "It's really great spectrum, and it's going to yield some great applications."

Analog TV signals use the 700MHz frequency band, meaning that by nature, they travel farther than those on bands used by the wireless and electronics industries today. Reusing that spectrum could mean easier and cheaper deployment of broadband networks--and translate to more affordable, widespread high-speed Internet access for consumers.

chart

The compromise also settled differences over the amount of money to be set aside for a set-top box subsidy program for those still relying on over-the-air analog broadcasts.

Before Wednesday's action, a 1997 law stipulated that analog television would have be cut off on Dec. 31, 2006, or when 85 percent of households are capable of receiving digital signals, whichever arrived sooner. A slice of that spectrum would be handed over to police, fire, ambulance and other public safety responders who rely on the analog spectrum to communicate.

But eight years later, with the transition nowhere near that percentage mark and the 9/11 Commission warning of the perils of inadequate spectrum, politicians and interest groups stepped up the pressure to set a hard deadline. Reports of bungled communications during Hurricane Katrina upped the urgency.

The final bill also earmarks $1 billion for upgrading emergency communications equipment.

President Bush must sign the package into law before it takes effect. Because the House of Representatives also must approve it--which is expected to be just a formality--it was unclear Wednesday when it would reach the White House.

Upgrading the rabbit ears
American households have until the February 2009 deadline to ensure that their televisions are capable of receiving digital broadcasts.

According to congressional estimates, less than 15 percent of households rely exclusively on over-the-air broadcasts. According to estimates by the Federal Communications Commission, that number will drop to 7 percent by 2009.

But advocacy group Consumers Union said that will still leave an unconscionable number of individual sets--many of them operated by elderly and low-income viewers--ill-equipped to meet the changes.

Households that already rely solely on cable or satellite broadcasting should not have to make any changes. Satellite services, such as DirecTV, are already capable of converting signals, and most cable companies intend a seamless transition, such as re-engineering their signals at the source, so that no extra home hardware is necessary.

Many are already conscious of the switch. According to the Consumer Electronics Association, TV manufacturers offer more than 600 models of digital TV products, including integrated sets, digital monitors and set-top receivers. Since they began releasing the devices in 1998, they have sold more than 13 million products.

FCC rules require all television sets and other TV receivers on the market to contain digital tuners by March 1, 2007.

In short, only those who continue to rely solely on over-the-air broadcast stations should have to make adjustments. Short of buying a new digital-ready television, they can opt for a digital-to-analog converter box, which manufacturers estimate will cost about $50 by 2009.

The approved Senate package would dispense up to $1.5 billion in government subsidies to households, which may request up to two $40 vouchers to use toward purchasing set-top boxes.

But Consumers Union argued those funds are sorely inadequate to meet those needs and would still leave $2 billion in overall out-of-pocket costs for consumers.

Jeannine Kenney, a senior policy analyst for the organization, also criticized the bill for setting aside only $5 million for consumer education. "Consumers will have no idea what's coming and what they need to do to prepare for it, making it likely that tens of millions of television sets will go black on Feb. 17, 2009," she said.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Federal government

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Cable

Create an email alert | RSS feed

TVs

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
household, spectrum, deadline, digital television, set-top box

46 comments (Page 1 of 3)
Fifty Dollar Boxes
by NewWorldDan December 21, 2005 12:51 PM PST
I for one happen to get my TV over the air. I'm still waiting for one of those mythical $50 boxes to show up at my local retailer. I want to go digital, but I can't justify spending $300 on a converter that might be obsolete in a few years. Oddly, I have no problem blowing $1000 on a computer that absolutely will be obsolete in the same time span.
Reply to this comment View reply
Typical Feet Dragging
by LinuxRules December 21, 2005 2:44 PM PST
I really can not take this typical American Politician feet dragging any more. Stick to the original schedule. These Morals put off implementing the Metric System forever. These invertebrates need to stand their ground and force the corporations in making the box top receivers now. Just try and buy a under $100. (Radio Shack has one, thats all I can find). All the stations in my area are now broadcasting Digital and no one thinks they need to do anything now to buy or sell the units. Why? BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO BACKBONES.
Reply to this comment
$10 is too much?
by open-mind December 21, 2005 3:11 PM PST
According to the story, by the time it's needed, a converter box should be about $50, minus a $40 subsidy. So like $10. Does Consumers Union think $10 is too much? Or do they think those future prices are bogus?
Reply to this comment View reply
"It's the content, stupid."
by MichaelM December 21, 2005 3:50 PM PST
Too bad the conversion to all-digital broadcasts will do little to improve the dreck that qualifies as entertainment today. I canceled my cable service and then my satellite service because I refused to pay for so many unwanted channels, to say nothing of the endless commercials. I would rather the government use the $40 voucher to help fund better OTA programming.
Reply to this comment View reply
And by then I'll be podcatching HDTV
by CharlesRovira December 21, 2005 5:52 PM PST
This is very good. The broadcast industry is forcing a whole new standard and requiring that all equipment be upgraded. All of the TVs will require on-board computers to decode and decompress the signals captured over the air (an 'iffy' situation at best) or from cable. People who are resistant to having these devices, lets call them neo-luddites, are not going to be happy when their old Philco goes dark; but the industry doesn't care. To be honest, neither do we, the technorati. This WILL happen, whether its stupid or not. Meanwhile podcatching (and podasting) are already becoming entrenched. Why pay for an additional TiVO just because you're not there spot on seven to watch a show, when you're already using a computer. With podcatching you can elect to catch it anytime it becomes available, watch it when you want, as often as you want, to fast forward or reverse over parts of it, all on the same HDTV screen, that is dropping in price as I write this. Your money goes directly to the producer, the content provider, which kills the avertising market. They'll be forced to use Google and make their ads for podcasting. You don't bothered by the broadcaster's eternal need for money, with the ever growing 30% interruptions of the programming. When that programming isn't preempted because some other programming knocks your show from the roster just because it was cheaper to produce and doesn't impact their ability to sell coffee-flavoured hemmorhoid shaving cream. The broadcasters never thought that the internet would be their downfall. After all, its packetized, non-continuous, jerky and could never compete with on-air quality. (Trying to watch streaming video can be time consuming, what with all those 'Buffering ..." messages, and trying to listen to streaming audio can be painful to artistic ears.) But since they're going digital and the old rabbit ears are about to be lopped off, they're in the same boat. If a fly farts or there's a flare on Aldebaran, your tevevisual experience boils down to "No Signal, or encrypted..." Podcatching is a much superior delivery mechanism for digital content. Well, they brought it on themselves. I predict that they'll have another five years before their investors force them into liquidation. Broadcsating has commited suicide. Long live podcasting (and podcasters.)
Reply to this comment View reply
They will extend it again
by sda3 December 21, 2005 10:43 PM PST
Watch them push it back again. It was supposed to happen Jan 1, 2006
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Free to air digital tv in the UK already - Box £30
by ahickey December 22, 2005 12:01 AM PST
Free to air digital TV is already in the UK and you can get the convertor boxes for £30 whcih is about $50, so the price is right. This is what I have and it suits my needs. The picture quality is great and the extra information available is fantastic. I spent some of the summer watching Wimbledon and when the through the digital box I could watch any of 3 courts on the same channel. So, if the offical coverage wasn't the game I wanted to see I wasn't stuck with it. I think it is right to change over to digital for so many reasons. HDTV Surround Sound Imrpoved Control Free up bandwidth for all those new technologies we want. By the time 2009 comes people will be crying out for it. Think back 4/5 years. Where was broadband where was wireless, where was personal medial players (not using a brand name...) By 2009 digital will be mainstream and the conversion will have happened with out any fuss.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Already Obsolete?
by tofarrell December 22, 2005 6:29 AM PST
Seems that they are ensuring that Government and Big Business will still have total control over what and how you receive information over the airwaves. This will assure new technologies will be controlled and monopolized and personal expressions censored for years to come. I wonder how many superbowl commercials it would take to make those set top boxes free?
Reply to this comment
Require Inclusion of ATSC Tuners NOW!...
by fred dunn December 22, 2005 7:09 AM PST
They are letting the consumer electronics industry get away with another year or so of peddling analog-only sets when the vast majority of couch potatoes do not even know this is coming. They are magnifying the same problem they are trying to solve by extending the date for the "required" inclusion of a digital tuner. The sidenote to this is that it doesn't take much to include the tuner in a set but if the manufacturers sell the unit as a "monitor" as so many HD sets sell as then this requirement does not apply so they wind up having to buy a set top box anyway. Bottom line: If you are going to buy a TV for "over the air" (OTA) use then you need to select one of the few that has a digital tuner built-in or you will be playing multiple remotes again just like in the old VHS days. Remember this too, When your cable or satellite signal goes dark for one reason or another, if you don't have the tuner then you are SOL (solidly out of luck). What did you think it meant? Fred Dunn
Reply to this comment
Actuall $10 is far too much, it should be free!
by heystoopid December 22, 2005 11:26 AM PST
Since the Spectrum will cancelled by law, then the government, is required to provide a free alternative to end user, to be paid for and installed by all broadcasters of this technology, for that is the only way, to insure uniform introduction by the due date!
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Click Here
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Texas to force Amazon into sales tax collection?
HP to acquire EDS for $13.9 billion
Hello, lover: HBO-iTunes hookup is official
Mac Office sales soar on Apple's gains
Friend Connect warms up Google Campfire One
Most Popular Stories
RIM makes a Bold BlackBerry debut
Google to launch Friend Connect for the social Web
Stolen Mac helps nab burglary suspects
FBI probe nets counterfeit Chinese networking parts
Google brings Friend Connect to the masses
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-0.15%) -19.13 12,857.18
S&P 500 (-0.06%) -0.89 1,402.69
NASDAQ (-0.25%) -6.10 2,482.39
CNET TECH (-0.04%) -0.64 1,745.16
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On TV.com: THE OFFICE season 4
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: