December 14, 2007 10:42 AM PST

Does GM now mean 'green motors'?

Related Stories

The plot behind killing electric cars

August 28, 2007
Related Blogs

GM walks the walk on hydrogen fuel cells


June 15, 2007

Dinner with a General Motors exec


September 19, 2007

Hydrogen-powered Chevys hit the streets


October 21, 2007

Cleaner and faster cars at the L.A. Auto Show


November 27, 2007

(continued from previous page)

reporter's notebook The company also is trying to ensure that the people testing the cars will live near those rare hydrogen filling stations.

In addition, there will be a big push for hybrids and plug-in hybrids, GM executives said. Over the next four years, GM will release 16 hybrids into the market.

Meanwhile, in ethanol, GM will continue to put out flex fuel vehicles that can drive on E85, or a blend of fuel that is 85 percent ethanol. The company has already sold 2.5 million flex fuel cars, and by 2012, roughly half the cars coming out of its factories will be flex fuel cars.

A chief problem with flex fuel cars, however, is the lack of stations that pump E85. Only about 1 percent of stations in the U.S. sell the stuff. To this end, GM will work with stations by providing them with advertising dollars or other promotional materials.

Most of these alternative energy ideas will first appear in the Chevy line, said Susan Docherty, western region general manager for GM, rather than the more expensive brands like Cadillac. The idea is to penetrate the market more rapidly.

There may be a historical element to GM's lack of interest in all-electric cars. The company came out with the EV1, an all-electric vehicle, in the late 1990s. The car developed a small, but rabid, following. GM, however, canceled the leases and took all the cars back a few years later. Some have theorized that GM removed the car from the market to protect its dealer base and oil companies. GM and other automakers (along with several battery executives) have said the withdrawal came because sales were slow.

Either way, it wasn't a public relations high point for GM.

And, by the way, the leases were never huge in number. GM leased only about 800 of the cars over a four-year period, GM's Barthmuss said.

Previous page
Page 1 | 2
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 35 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
What?
by aka_tripleB December 14, 2007 11:27 AM PST
The big yellow signs that say "E85" aren't enough to let people that E85 is available there?
Reply to this comment View reply
GM's all about greenbacks, not green-motors..!!
by imacpwr December 14, 2007 12:10 PM PST
http://www.chevrolet.com/hybrid/

And GM has the gall to call to say "it?s one of the many ways GM
is working to reduce our dependence on petroleum" with a gas guzzling SUV..?!?

Just wait America, if the dollar continues its spiraling decent
you'll soon see pump prices equalling those here in Europe.
Maybe then you'll be wishing you hadn't bought that 20mpg
"green" SUV and bought a 45mpg Volkswagen instead.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
The Volt has me 'energized'
by Vegaman_Dan December 14, 2007 2:45 PM PST
I can't afford a new car. I really can't, but by the time the Volt is ready in 2010, I will be able to look seriously at my first new car purchase ever. At $30K, this is soemthing I would be very much interested in. Since my daily commute is 35 miles, the electric motor would cut my fuel bills in half right there alone. Even with my fuel sipping compact pickup, the price of gas currently would mean I could drop my weekly fuel costs to $15-20 a week.

The company I work for has a large campus and already is offering plug in recharge stations for the Prius as an employee perk. Since the Volt takes a standard 120 VAC plug, there is no special charging stations needed. Already that company is talking about providing similar parking spaces for those vehicles. That would reduce my commuting costs to... zero.

Zero. That's NO money going to Big Oil at all. Now I have to be realistic and know that I will still fill the tank and it will run on gas now and then, but instead of filling up once a week, it will be more likely I'll fill up once every month or two.

Figure $30 per tank. Five tanks a month. Take that away and it's $150 month the oil company doesn't get from me. At year's end, that's $1800 that they don't get from my income. That money will go a long ways towards the price of the car itself.

Plus you have to admit, the thing is undeniably cool looking. A hybrid or electric car doesn't have to look ugly (like the Prius), they only build them that way. The Volt could be a mass produced car that really makes a difference in our oil consumption habits.
Reply to this comment
Only plug-ins make sense
by theBike45 December 14, 2007 5:05 PM PST
Battery-only electric cars at this point are, well, pointless. They are no advance over the EV-1, which was no advance over the Detroit Electric, circa 1907. The VOLT represents the first truly practical (at "nicely under $30K)
electrically propelled automobile and one that is neither inconvenient nor impotent, as all of the battery only electrics are. It takes advantage, brilliantly, on the fact that most cars don't travel more than 20 miles from home
much of the time, nor travel more than 40 miles a day (14,600 miles per year). Obviously Larry Hagmen doesn't understand the concept of tinted windows - here in Florida they are everywhere, and
immensely useful.
Reply to this comment View reply
GM should stand for 'green-washing motors'
by digital.proteus December 14, 2007 5:42 PM PST
GM works hard to create the (false) impression they actually care about the environment. It's articles like this that **** me off. GM is not a company that is on the side of ?green? cars. It has spent millions lobbying against tougher corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards and it KILLED THE ELECTRIC CAR, while continuing to push the not-in-our-lifetime hydrogen car instead.
Reply to this comment View reply
Kanellos is a GM shill
by jemiller0 December 14, 2007 6:29 PM PST
The subject says it all. GM, a green company? I don't think so. Look at the joke hybrids they are coming out with. GM won green car of the year with an SUV that gets 21 MPG! Prius gets 60! Regardless, GM is going down and will continue to do so because they make unreliable products. I like the way GM is already advertising the Volt. It won't be out for another 2 years at least and that is if they release it at all. All it is is marketting. They want to ride the green wave now that it's popular.
Reply to this comment View reply
Gas guzzling SUV
by decomrade December 14, 2007 8:07 PM PST
It makes a lot more sense to put a hybrid powertrain (re: the Tahoe doesn't lose any power unlike comparable Toyota and regular last-gen GM hybrids... Hell, even Hondas) in a vehicle that gets under 20MPG with its regular powertrain than putting one in a vehicle that gets over 30, don't you think?

It takes so long to get the money you invest in a Prius back that it's not even worth it, while the money you'd invest in a hybridized Tahoe comes back rather quickly! And it's well-equipped, too.
Reply to this comment
We dont need Moore's Law.
by ronpierre December 15, 2007 7:14 PM PST
On your own figures in 10 years time a battery car will go 500 miles on a charge and cost 70% less. Who needs Moores Law. By the time the volt is out in 2010 (even without the inevitable delays) batteries should be doing 333 miles and cost 20% less. When you factor in no gas, no maintenance and continuing battery improvements at an incremental level who needs Moores Law type improvements?
Reply to this comment
Better bring more coal plants online!
by mcepat December 16, 2007 5:24 PM PST
With everybody plugging in there cars we will need them.

Why would we want to have all cars plug intot he grid like the Chevy Volt when the majority of powere provided to the grid is supplied by the dirtiest sources there is to the earth (coal)

Plugging your car in does not make it magical and zero impact free, the electricity is made and then supplied to your house

we need to look more to self hydrogen systems like purdue unvirsity is working on or the guy with the salt water for energy

we need to close the loop for energy of cars, not add it to a much bigger costly, dirty loop known as the grid
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
We could have purely electric cars
by crazeduser December 16, 2007 6:18 PM PST
The excuse that batteries are the reason we can't have electric cars
is wrong. Interested parties should watch "Who Killed the Electric
Car?" or read the Wiki page at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F

-Jim
Reply to this comment View reply
Error in story.
by ralfthedog December 16, 2007 8:13 PM PST
... or green liquids like ethanol. ...

Ethanol is only green on saint Patrick's day. All other days it is clear.
Reply to this comment
GM green motors
by mtoc December 17, 2007 3:10 AM PST
GM should try to work more in the present than in the future. if they did, they probably would sell more cars!
Reply to this comment View reply
1995 was viable 2007 more viable
by BrianOh2 December 18, 2007 1:55 PM PST
I like people who tell us black is white.
Groucho said it well "Who do you believe, me
or your own eyes?". We all saw the EV1 or at
least a video. Or shouldn't I believe me eyes?
Brian
Reply to this comment
Air Powered Car?
by Sparky650 February 22, 2008 10:19 AM PST
That seems more interesting that all these mentions.
Reply to this comment
More needs to be done
by tech_crazy May 5, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
I was one of the guinea pigs test-driving another vehicle from GM, back in 1997. It was a modified Geo Metro. The acceleration was fantastic as was the simplicity - 2 switches - one for forward/reverse, the other for wet/dry braking (normal/regenerative).

What sucked was the battery capacity - less than 100 miles on a charge.

I had thought about the small gas motor idea to recharge the battery back then but never got around to patenting/publishing on it and now that idea is taken. They call it a "serial hybrid" technology now, unlike the Prius' "parallel hybrid".

What most people don't realize is that even if it is made plug-in, where is the electricity going to come from? If its the same non-renewable source like coal, we have just shifted the problem around, not solved it.

In my opinion we need to solve problems systematically

1) Use renewable sources - solar, wind, hydel
2) Use more efficient technologies as applicable. e.g. fuel cells have a higher efficiency.
3) Use a combination of techniques and fitting the problem keeping in mind that there is no "one size fits all" solution.
4) Encourage, plan and implement effective mass transportation. This is woefully lacking in most of the US.

That this if we really intend to solve/mitigate the problems.
Reply to this comment
by BigDumbRedneck May 29, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
Tell Tesla Motors that electric cars are not an alternative..
We Americans are ridiculous..if it wont go 500 miles on a charge, we dont want it. We better be waking up soon, the Amero is coming ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amero ) and times are-a-changing. We must stop believing everything CNN, Fox and MSNBC tell us as gospel and find out for ourselves.
Remember folks, no-where is it set in stone that The United States will prevail forever, its up to us.
People should not fear its Government, Governments should fear its PEOPLE!!
BDR
Reply to this comment
by willdryden June 2, 2008 2:03 AM PDT
I ordered mine Volt. http://www.chevymall.com/shopping/product/detailmain.jsp?itemID=5077&itemType=PRODUCT&RS=1&keyword=volt Buy it now before they pull the model off the market. I do not think they will ever built the full sized version.
Reply to this comment
 See all 35 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

Resource center from News.com sponsors
Same great protection. Reengineered for speed.
Norton Internet Security™2008

Click Here!
Norton still delivers award-winning protection and now uses 83% less memory and scans 48% faster than the competitor average. Get a FREE trial today!

Click Here!
Norton Beats the Competition

See how Norton Internet Security™2008 uses less memory, while scanning and booting faster than the competitor average.

Norton Protection Blog

Read the latest from our security experts as they help protect people from evolving online threats.

Protect Your Bluetooth Connection

Don't let fraudsters sink their teeth into your Bluetooth connection.

Vishing - What you need to know

Meet the latest ID theft scam: Voice Phishing.

Take Norton for a Test Drive Today!

Act now to get your FREE trial of Norton Internet Security 2008.

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right