- Related Stories
-
Record exec: Mobile industry could learn from Apple
March 28, 2007 -
EMI courts YouTube to help fight pirates
June 14, 2006 -
Apple, labels stick with 99 cents per iTunes song
May 1, 2006 -
iPods to support copy-protected CDs?
November 17, 2005 -
EMI, Audible Magic ink anti-piracy deal
October 29, 2002
EMI's entire digital music catalog will be available in premium DRM-free form via iTunes in May, the music label said Monday at a press conference in London. Beatles tunes under EMI's control, however, are not part of the plan.
Higher-quality music files, which will play on any computer and any digital-audio player, will not replace the copy-protected EMI music currently sold through iTunes. Rather, they will complement the standard 99-cent iTunes downloads and will be sold at a premium: $1.29 per song.
Consumers who have already purchased EMI tracks containing Apple's FairPlay copy protection will be able to upgrade them to the premium version for 30 cents, EMI said. Full albums in DRM-free form can be bought at the same price as standard iTunes albums.
"We are committed to embracing change, and to developing products and services that consumers really want to buy," said Eric Nicoli, chief executive of EMI. Nicoli cited internal EMI tests in which higher-quality, DRM-free songs outsold its lower-quality, copy-protected counterparts 10-to-1.
The higher sound quality of EMI's premium tracks is produced by increasing their bit rate, which translates to larger files with reduced compression.
After initially selling the premium DRM-free music through Apple, EMI plans to expand the program to other music outlets. Retailers partnering with EMI, which also plans to remove DRM from its video downloads, will be able to choose from a variety of levels of sound quality. Retailers will also be able to choose whether to sell files in the MP3, WMA or AAC format.
In iTunes, music will be sold in a 256 kilobit-per-second AAC format.
The packed press conference at EMI's London headquarters featured a performance by EMI recording artist The Good, The Bad and The Queen, as well as a guest appearance by Apple CEO Steve Jobs.
Jobs, who stressed the need for higher-quality music with the rise of high-fidelity home speaker systems, called EMI's move "the next big step forward in the digital-music revolution--the movement to completely interoperable DRM-free music." He added that "Apple will reach out to all the major and independent labels to give them the same opportunity."
Jobs expressed confidence in Apple's plan to offer the premium DRM-free tracks alongside standard ones. "What we're adding is a choice--a new choice," Jobs said regarding Apple's decision to make available two levels of sound quality and of DRM restriction. He suggested that half of iTunes' music tracks will be available in both DRM-loaded and DRM-free form by the end of 2007.
"EMI is pioneering something that I think is going to become very popular," Jobs said when asked if other music labels would likely add DRM-free music to their iTunes catalog.
But James McQuivey, an analyst at Forrester Research, said he believes that other labels may approach the prospect of DRM-free music sales with trepidation.
"The timing of when they sign on is going to be what's interesting to watch," McQuivey said. "They will eventually, but eventually could mean a year from now. Now that a major label has done it, they're all going to want to wait and see the proof that it worked."
In February, Jobs released an open letter to record companies, encouraging them to abandon DRM restrictions and claiming that Apple had only implemented the controversial system because the four major record labels would not have otherwise signed up with iTunes.
News.com Poll
In the recent past, EMI has put forth some initiatives in digital-music distribution that could be considered somewhat experimental, most notably offering its music catalog to peer-to-peer services like Mashboxx and iMesh. But until this point, DRM-free music had been largely the domain of services like eMusic, with songs limited to those from independent labels.
"This is something that Apple wants, but it's something that EMI needs," McQuivey said.
"Together with the RIAA, (EMI) was one of the loudest voices among the labels sponsoring the aggressive lawsuits against people who were file-sharing music," McQuivey said of the Recording Industry Association of America's persistent legal battles against music pirates using peer-to-peer networks. "It's not to say that you can't aggressively pursue file sharers and develop a digital strategy, but they didn't. They chose to focus on the lawsuits, hoping to keep the CD business alive."
Last year, iTunes rival Yahoo Music tested the DRM-free waters by offering a Jesse McCartney album and a Jessica Simpson single for sale with no copy protection.
EMI announced the press conference on Sunday, leading to much speculation of whether it was a prank--"We are acutely aware that the invitations were issued on April Fools' Day," Nicoli observed--and whether the event might have been held to unveil the availability of songs by The Beatles on iTunes.
Music from the Fab Four has been released by EMI since 1962 and is currently unavailable for legal digital download anywhere on the Internet. When a reporter asked Jobs whether a Beatles deal with EMI was upcoming, Jobs replied, "I want to know that, too." Nicoli stressed that "we're working on it."
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Media players
DRM
Music
Apple
See more CNET content tagged:
EMI Group Plc.,
Steve Jobs,
Apple iTunes,
digital-rights management,
digital music


questions:
1. What's the quality diffference? If there's a 30 cents price
increase, then it'd better be very significant.
2. Does this mean that more audio devices can connect to
iTunes, since the songs can be played on any device?
3. If they increased the price because of the quality difference,
then why didn't Apple/EMI just go the Yahoo Music route and
offer unrestricted songs at the same quality? That way there
wouldn't be a price increase and it would appeal to consumers
far more.
Almost everyone hates DRM, now we have a big label giving us what 'we want'. We need to show our support by buying their tracks. If this is seen as successful the other labels can't be far behind.
On to music Utopia!
wrote his open letter supporting DRM-free music. Yeah, you
people, the one who smugly wagged your fingers and shouted "Put
your money where your mouth is."
Here's his response. I hope you don't choke on the feathers as you
eat your well-deserved crow!
disappointed they won't be offering lossless audio.
The only problem with this implementation is Apple's insistence upon AAC. Apple is trying to lock people into the "Applesphere" (sorta) once again.
If Apple was 100% serious about offering digital downloads DRM free then they would have offered them in the more universal mp3 format (I know AAC can be converted relatively easily but if I am paying a premium I don't want to have to waste my time converting the files).
Also, Apple should be offering encoding choices, for example, charge 1.30 for 256 VBR but maybe change 1.50 for 320 or lossless.
But all these things will come in the coming years (though you can get them now with AllofMp3.com).
As for now, I applaud EMI for taking this desperately needed initiative.
- It's a good start...
-
by Siegfried Schtauffen
April 2, 2007 8:13 AM PDT
- ...but I would have been happier if they used MP3 instead. Yes, I know AAC is not a Apple standard, and it is arguably better, but it simply isn't as commonly supported. Hopefully this will be a success.
-
Reply to this comment
View
all 2 replies
-
-
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>Thanks Steve!