Editors' picks
No longer confined to the technology subculture in which it grew up, Web logging is going mainstream. So much so that bloggers even received invitations to attend the Democratic National Convention in Boston last month. But their performance wilted under the glare of the spotlight. That kindled a debate about the real prospects for blogging's future. Will blogs truly revolutionize the way people consume media?
August 10, 2004
The DNC debut
Blogging came into the spotlight when a few dozen bloggers were awarded press credentials at the Democratic National Convention in Boston. With the nation's focus on them, it was truly the credentialed bloggers' moment to shine. Some say the DNC blogs did just that; some say they were a miserable failure; others excuse the lack of earth-shattering coverage to first-date jitters and stage fright.
Critics' corner
For better or for worse, blogging has carved out its spot in the mainstream media. In doing so, it gained the attention of journalists around the world and has certainly incurred the wrath of many. Likened to the "lunchtime chatter in a high-school cafeteria," blogs are taking a beating in the ongoing commentary on their worth. While their overall journalistic contribution can be debated endlessly, some of the medium's drawbacks cannot be ignored. Studies show that their voluntary nature is a huge detriment, with 25 percent of blogs being abandoned within a year of their inception. And Fark.com's recent declaration that its contributors don't hold themselves "to the same standards as (The New York Times)" probably didn't do the genre any favors.
Support system
Critics like to use words like vapid, boring, uninformed and lazy to describe why they don't waste their time with blogs. But many others believe that blogs represent a true democratization of the First Amendment, warts and all. Instant interaction with readers, a diversity of viewpoints and the ability to focus on a favorite subject are among the strongest selling points.