Five reasons not to fear a $200 Linux PC

Related Stories
Dell: Microsoft warnings haven't hurt Linux uptake
October 12, 2007
Dell picks Ubuntu for Linux PCs
May 1, 2007
Related Blogs
Linux available on ThinkPad T61 and R61

January 15, 2008
Almost the Google PC: Everex gPC available at Wal-Mart

October 31, 2007
Shuttle's $199 Linux PC

January 9, 2008
Another sub-$200 Linux PC?

January 17, 2008
Linux is not just for computer whizzes.

In fact, buying Linux and learning how to use it are easier than ever, thanks to the open-source operating system's expanding presence in affordable computers and mainstream retail outlets.

In quick succession, the number of mass-market, sub-$200 desktops has tripled--from one to three--in less than three months. At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier this month, small form-factor PC maker Shuttle debuted its $199 KPC. The catch? It's not preloaded with Windows, but an operating system based on Linux. Then last week, Mirus and Linspire collaborated on the Mirus Linux PC, which is now for sale at Sears.com. It's $299 (although an included $100 rebate brings it to $199), and is preloaded with Freespire 2.0, an Ubuntu-based Linux distribution.

But the beginning of the low-cost computer trend actually started last fall. The Everex gPC showed up on the shelves of Wal-Mart for $198, a low price even for a desktop PC. It's bundled with speakers, a mouse, and a keyboard, and it comes with 24-hour tech support. The operating system is called gOS, a version of Ubuntu 7.10. Sure, that may be almost unpronounceable for most average consumers, but despite that, Wal-Mart is having trouble keeping the gPC in stock.

Photos: Three sub-$200 Linux PCs

Linux is getting more mainstream exposure than just appearing in inexpensive computers. It's now being offered by two of the world's largest PC manufacturers, Dell and Lenovo, and is making its way into tiny--not to mention trendy--inexpensive laptops, like One Laptop Per Child's XO, Everex's CloudBook, and Asus' Eee PC, all of which come with Linux preinstalled. In the case of the Eee, it is doing surprisingly well with consumers.

So what are we to think now that Linux, long popular among a very narrow niche of computer users, is making its way to mainstream retail outlets? Perhaps that trying a $200 Linux PC isn't as risky as some might think. Here are five reasons why.

Lower barrier to entry
At $200, that's not a huge penalty for trying an unfamiliar operating system packaged by a hardware company you may not have heard of before. Just to put it in proper perspective, $199 is less than half the price of an iPhone, and is roughly equivalent to about 5 percent of the cost of a new decent-quality 32-inch high-definition TV or five to six tanks of gas. If you don't have a ton of expendable income, you can always put off updating your current Windows or Mac machine for six months, try it out, and see what you think.

Preinstalled is perfect for newbies
True, the biggest headache associated with most versions of Linux these days is the actual installation, but that's the case for any operating system, Stephen O'Grady, principal analyst for Redmonk, points out. Installing Windows from scratch on a machine can hit snags just as much as installing a version of Linux. But, he added, "If you're getting it preinstalled, the manufacturer has done the legwork to make sure the individual parts in the machine work with the operating system involved." All of that can translate to fewer headaches for the user.

And maintenance is relatively easy. That's because most versions of Linux come with package management. Unlike Windows, which just updates the operating system itself, Ubuntu, for example, will update the OS plus any of the applications included. "The average everyday user doesn't have to do anything," O'Grady said.

Familiarity breeds loyalty
Linux is getting easier to use all the time--and better looking. The past two years have seen the most consistent leaps in the improvement of the user interface. In the last year alone, 3D desktop effects--a la Windows Vista and Mac OS X--have been introduced.

"There has been some effort in recent years to make the transition more comfortable by mimicking some of the user conventions of Windows or Mac OS," said O'Grady. For instance, a "Start" menu or an applications "dock." The Everex Green PC runs gOS, whose desktop looks strikingly similar to Mac OS X.

The specs are acceptable for general use
All of the companies making sub-$200 Linux machines--Everex, Shuttle, and Mirus--use brand-name parts you've heard of: Intel processors and chipsets; ATI graphics cards; and more. Mirus' and Shuttle's Linux PCs come with a minimum of 1GB of memory, and Everex's comes with 512MB, upgradable to 2GB. All three have an 80GB hard drive, enough to do basic computing tasks. It should be noted that none of the offerings is a complete PC, however. The gPC and the Mirus lack a monitor, and the Shuttle comes with nothing but the PC.

The Web browser is your friend
It sounds simple, but most of what the average user wants to do with a computer these days can be done online: word processing, spreadsheets, e-mail, photo editing, and more, which means less storage is less of an issue. You want e-mail? Gmail and the included GTalk instant-messaging feature are free. And Google's Docs and Spreadsheets Web apps get all of your office productivity done online (though most of the three PCs have open-source versions of Microsoft Office). For watching videos, there's YouTube and Hulu.com. And rather than downloading a photo editing tool, anyone can upload their photos to Flickr and use Picnik's editing software right in the browser.

The success of devices like the gPC and Mirus Freespire--both are sold out at Wal-Mart and Sears.com, respectively--and even the more expensive and portable Eee PC, is a surprise to most.

"The success is, in part, driven by the fact that for people doing an increasing percentage of day-to-day tasks like e-mail in the context of software as a service, at that point it soon doesn't matter what operating system you have," said Redmonk's O'Grady. "If a majority of (computer) usage is browsing the Internet and doing things like that, (Linux) is perfectly credible, perfectly usable."

More from News.com on this story's topics

Personal computers

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Linux

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Linux PC, Everex, Ubuntu, Linux, Stephen O'Grady

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 132 comments (Page 1 of 3)
really?
by FutureGuy January 24, 2008 11:16 AM PST
I could go to a local walmart and pick up a linux PC for 199 since last year? Humm, I was told by the *nix fanboys that people buy Vista PCs only because they don't have an option, they are "forced" to buy them!!!
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
It's not ready.
by thenet411 January 24, 2008 11:32 AM PST
Look, I am a big fan of Linux in the corporate and hobbiest spaces. They are excellent and robust servers and powerful workstations in the hands of tinkerers and computer professionals. But for mainstream users who are hopelessly addicted to the Windows way of computing, they are a non-issue. Sure, Linux has come a long way since the days of X but even the best desktop environments are not very new user friendly. Remember when WordPerfect was the king of the hill in word processing? Remember how MS Word took over the throne? They implemented a series of helper functions to assist those who were hopelessly addicted to WordPerfect migrate to Word. Help functions, pop up hints, even menu structures, were mimicked as close as legal to WordPerfect so it would make it easier to migrate. And it worked. Like it or not, Linux is going to have to do the same thing if it wants to win over the mainstream user. The desktops will have to be very similar to Windows and the applications will have to be as well. It's not going to happen overnight and it's not even happening yet. The person who wrote this article would better serve the mainstream readers if they would stop being a fangirl and start being a realist.
Reply to this comment View all 7 replies
They are not $200 PCs without a monitor!
by krosavcheg January 24, 2008 11:44 AM PST
Just shows how silly tech reporters are these days when they cannot do a simple analysis. You need a $100 monitor to go with that PC. So then why not pay another 50 dollars and get a real Windows PC from big names like Lenovo/Dell/Acer etc? I'm sure users will find the $50 premium for being able to run the vast majority of software out there quite reasonable. Yes even the internet requires plugins like Flash/QuickTime/Windows Media etc etc and Linux just doesn't cut it. This is a silly stupid story without a point.
Reply to this comment View all 7 replies
OSX
by coryschulz January 24, 2008 11:56 AM PST
Apple took Unix and made it people friendly. OSX is great! Linux still isn't entirely people friendly and fails to deliver a user friendly experience. I think Linux is worthless on a regular persons desktop machine. They might think they can go out and buy some software and install it, or buy a video game and play it, only to find out that nothing like that works with Linux. It can be a pain getting drivers and codecs to work properly. And no offense, but a lot of the programs written in the open source community are half assed and need to be better designed. They're just terrible to use compared to professional products. There are a few exceptions to this, but for the most part I don't care for open source that much. I'm glad it exists, but I don't want it on my machine and I don't think it's in the best interest of other people either.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
5% of the cost of a TV?
by lordeagle January 24, 2008 11:59 AM PST
According to this "journalist" $199 is about 5% of the cost of a "new decent-quality 32-inch high-definition TV" (to me that doesn't me top-of -the-line). Quick math: that's $3,980 for a 32" TV! When the last time this journalist looked at the price of TVs? 2001?? A very good 40-42" HDTV now costs around 2000 dollars... so 32" will be that much cheaper. I'm getting really annoyed by these "journalists" on CNET that post random numbers. How do you even get paid to post this???
Reply to this comment View reply
Linux
by ExWinUser January 24, 2008 12:06 PM PST
Out family has two computers. One has Ubuntu Linux installed and the other has WinXP Pro with all the virus protection, spyware protection, and latest updates. My teenage daughters are not computer geeks and don't care about OS versions, but they do care about MySpace, image editing, and loading music to their ipods. The Linux machine is still humming and the WinXP machine is down to a crawl. Now they love the Linux machine and hate the WinXP Pro machine! I already knew Linux was going to stand up to the riggers of two teenage duaghters and the WinXP Pro machine was going to eventually slow to a crawl. I will also never consider a Mac! Teenagers can easily adapt to Linux so give it a try!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
I bet...
by aemarques January 24, 2008 12:12 PM PST
... that the majority of these machines will have their hard drives formated and then the users will install a (probably pirated) copy of Windows...
Reply to this comment View reply
Open Source Version of MS Office?
by sirrobertm January 24, 2008 12:22 PM PST
I'm sure the people that design OpenOffice are very unhappy to hear you call their product that. Why not call it an open-source office suite or an open-source equivalent to MS Office? You make it sound like Microsoft made it.
Reply to this comment View reply
I agree in General
by rarsa January 24, 2008 12:34 PM PST
I agree in general with the statement that these computers are usable by the average user. I disagree with the tone that seems to imply that Linux "Is OK for lesser things". Linux when preinstalled and when using the appropriate hardware can be as functional as other OSs. Of course not all OSs are the same so some will be better at some things some will be better at others, but that's true with anything. There is always a tradeoff.
Reply to this comment
Open source version of Microsoft Office?
by markforstneger January 24, 2008 12:36 PM PST
When did this happen? I haven't heard of it before. Maybe you mean OpenOffice? That is not a Microsoft product; it works and it's free.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Yahoo responds to Icahn
Your Web activity, logged and loaded
Florida seeks to fine Verizon for bad service
Deconstructing Wikipedia at the Berkman Center
Nintendo tops April game console sales
Most Popular Stories
CBS to buy CNET Networks
Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop
Intel Germany executive reportedly confirms Atom-based iPhone
Xbox 360 hits 10 million sold in U.S.
Photos: Microsoft previews 2008 Xbox games
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You can do more when your phone runs Windows®
Windows Mobile

See it all at StartDoingMore.com Start Doing More

Start doing more
Get More Done with Windows Mobile

There's so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. StartDoingMore.com>

Familiar Microsoft Software and Services

With a Windows Mobile phone, your easy-to-use Microsoft software go wherever you go.

Choose the perfect phone for you

Side, flip, qwerty, touchscreen? See More>

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.73%) 94.28 12,992.66
S&P 500 (1.06%) 14.91 1,423.57
NASDAQ (1.48%) 37.03 2,533.73
CNET TECH (1.67%) 29.18 1,781.41
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On MovieTome: Your first look at the new JAMES BOND
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: