Newsmaker: Gates explains why Microsoft needs Yahoo

Gates explains why Microsoft needs Yahoo
Related Stories
Microsoft's big bid for Yahoo
May 16, 2008
Memo to Microsoft: Yahoo's A-list
February 13, 2008
Microsoft buys speech recognition company Tellme
March 14, 2007
Related Blogs
Gates on Yahoo: It's the people

February 19, 2008
Keyboard, mouse to get company in Windows 7

February 19, 2008
Cultural differences loom large in Microsoft-Yahoo

February 1, 2008
Microsoft wants to bring Surface home sooner

February 4, 2008
newsmaker PALO ALTO, Calif.--For a man a few months away from leaving his job, Bill Gates has a lot on his mind.

The Microsoft chairman is looking ahead to the time later this year when he will be focused full-time on fighting disease and poverty, while also trying to do everything he can to help his software company in its battle against Google. These days, that includes trying to sell Microsoft's $40 billion plus offer for Yahoo, not only to Wall Street, but also to all those Yahoo folks that Gates has his eye on.

Gates spoke to CNET News.com on Tuesday about how Microsoft needs Yahoo's engineering talent, how Windows 7 will make the keyboard and mouse less essential, though far from obsolete, and what journalism will look like in the future.

Q: You mentioned in some of the phone interviews earlier today that Microsoft isn't really looking to up its bid for Yahoo. I was hoping you might be to talk about why acquiring Yahoo is important, what is it that they have that they could bring to Microsoft? And then as a follow-up, do you think the company is ready to go the proxy fight route? Is that what's needed to get the deal in front of shareholders?
Gates: We have a strategy for competing in the search space that Google dominates today, that we'll pursue that we had before we made the Yahoo offer, and that we can pursue without that. It involves breakthrough engineering. We think that the combination with Yahoo would accelerate things in a very exciting way, because they do have great engineers, they have done a lot of great work. So, if you combine their work and our work, the speed at which you can innovate and get things done is just dramatically more rapid. So, it's really about the people there that want to join in and create a better search, better portal for a very broad set of customers. That's the vision that's behind saying, hey, wouldn't this be a great combination.

So, it's not a scale question but more a people question?
Gates: With people, you get scale in terms of the number of brilliant engineers and the speed of innovation that they're really driving. If you take mobile and video and neat new things for advertisers with targeting, and just the basic search algorithms, and the kind of computational platform we're building that we're using for search and we're going to use for cloud computing generally, the amount of computer science it's taken to do that is phenomenal. As you get more scale of engineering, you can just pursue that agenda more rapidly.

It's really about the people there that want to join in and create a better search, better portal for a very broad set of customers. That's the vision that's behind saying, hey, wouldn't this be a great combination.

So, yes, the advertisers and the number of end users is good, but we'd put the people in the engineering as the key thing that we say, yes, what can we get when we put their brilliant people and our brilliant people together.

Since you mentioned the people, how big of an issue do you think the cultural difference is? Because, I mean, obviously the key to retaining people is making sure that they actually want to work for Microsoft. Do you think there are significant cultural differences?
Gates: We've had an extremely successful group here in Silicon Valley that's done brilliant product work like Mediaroom and PowerPoint, and we have a research lab down here. Yahoo wants to do breakthrough software. The engineers there want to compete very effectively against Google or any other thing that comes along. So, I don't think there's really a different culture. If Yahoo had gone the direction of just being a media company, and not said that software innovation was important to them, then, no, there wouldn't be that intersection, because we're about breakthrough software. And that's where you can take search, portal, and these other things, and really bring them to a whole new level.

(Yahoo CEO) Jerry Yang, to his credit, has kept a lot of very top engineers that have just been doing their work and improving those things, and that's why we see the combination as so powerful.

One of the things that you've been talking a lot about is this idea of the new digital decade. What are some of the things that we can't do today that we're going to be able to do in the coming years through digital technology?
Gates: Well, everything is evolutionary in that things that start with a few people, get very widespread, and then eventually at least among younger people in the more developed markets just become common sense that that's the way things get done.

A cell phone that does photography; that's easy for your photos to just be shared and available. A cell phone that you can talk to and it will find the information that you're interested in. The next 10 years will have a lot of those (things) where they're not very commonplace today. If you look hard, you could find a little bit of location-based software or a little bit of interactive TV. But over a period of a decade, these increases become dramatic enough that it's a qualitative change, that you almost laugh at why did we have physical film, why did we have TV that was very channel-oriented.

There are a lot of these things about books, and note-taking, and TV watching that are basically unchanged by the digital revolution today, even though there are some avant-garde users. Whereas 10 years from now, the mainstream users will act like, well, of course, it was always supposed to be this way.

More Newsmakers

See more CNET content tagged:
Bill Gates, engineer, Yahoo! Inc., engineering, vision

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 26 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Not a good mix
by t8 February 20, 2008 2:55 PM PST
Yahoo is open source and Microsoft is proprietary. Not a good mix.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Microsoft/Yahoo
by goosgog February 20, 2008 5:04 PM PST
Remember all those OIL COMPANIES that competed with one another, gave you a choice and kept the price within reason. Now Look what's happened, The Big Three and the price per barrel is out of site and will soon be over $100. a barrel.We once had ANTI-TRUST it was just that! Long since gone!! If you think this deal would be good....all I can say is too bad Sucker, cause your gonna regret it !
Reply to this comment View reply
Expensive for People
by xcgeek February 20, 2008 7:00 PM PST
45B for Yahoo is a bit expensive if all you want is some engineers. They could be individually bought off for a fraction of that price.
Reply to this comment View reply
Gates answers a question or two about Yahoo... the rest is unrelated
by Cauthon February 20, 2008 7:31 PM PST
What happened with this article? I thought it was about Microsoft and Yahoo... who cares about schools using Tablet PC and natural language in Vista?
Reply to this comment
This is how Microsoft will lose all those great Yahoo engineers:
by tundraboy February 20, 2008 8:00 PM PST
Ballmer: Welcome, welcome to all Yahoo engineers. We've got a great retention package for you and we're waiting for brilliant new ideas. Ex-Yahoo Microsoftie: Wonderful. I've been working on this exciting new internet application that . . . B: Wait, wait. This idea of yours, will it run exclusively on Windows servers? Is it optimized solely for Windows PCs? Will it protect and preserve our Windows and Office monopoly? E-Y M: Well actually no because frankly it leapfrogs the Windows infrastructure, which is frankly kind of old technology. B: Oops, on second thought your idea sucks. Forget about it. If it doesn't protect and preserve the Windows-Office monopoly it's not going to see the light of day. E-Y M: Can you tell me again what highway goes from Redmond to Mountain View?
Reply to this comment
Make engineers want to come to Microsoft
by bartszyszka February 20, 2008 8:14 PM PST
This is so ridiculous. If Microsoft is after the engineers, why not make Microsoft a place where people want to work instead of stealing them from another company? After Yahoo has turned them down and everyone's pretty much in agreement that they don't want to work for Microsoft, how could any good come out of Microsoft taking over the company so aggressively?
Reply to this comment View reply
Caping the billionare
by wildchild_plasma_gyro February 20, 2008 10:01 PM PST
What If you capped Billionares for two resons. I was thinking what about 14 billion and increased year on year decided by inflation. 1) To Create a higher distribution of billionares and to work a higher representative group. 2) to create a stronger Kasian Bilionare market (Especially usful when considering the amount of managment minds needed to solve Earth affairs and make the future space market work properly not to mention to give a better stand point politically. This way it could actually social capitalistlically work that infact Billionares had a strong but Fairer voice and Gained more Bang for there buck in an even more sustainable way. Uncapping this leads to more potential for market inbalance and less balanace that could allow better bang for buck. If you held everyone down at a couple of mill then you would risk falling into a burocratic nightmare and if you went down further than that you could risk having very low market dynamics indeed and less cultural spread. So just as much as there should be a clever Minimum wage stratagy and good fair population control in the future we should consider Capping Fairly billionares but not in a way that would prevent good strong industrious minds from achieving good potential just to bolster dynamic strengh at that range to let more solutions occur in the world. Either way the issue must be addressed and handled with care the last thing anyone need is a nanny or to great a market distortion or other poor Market equlibrium nightmares the last century of industrial revolution was far bad enough in those respects.
Reply to this comment View reply
Not just the Engineers there Mr Gates
by wildchild_plasma_gyro February 20, 2008 10:22 PM PST
MSN is and could be better for basic communications reliability and a technical solutions system. Microosft the growing Software solutions group. These two ventures are heavily dependent on very strong engineering communities. Yes indeed somthing like yahoo or google need a damn good Engineering communty and Backbone but it Needs highly lingustically trained experts in everything and Managers who are Masters in Nash Equilibrium alwys looking to socially capitalise and balance the professional load. It's not the same. Infact if MSN dosent support technical solutions well in the future it could be to the detriment of the wider Engineering community. And if Microsoft dosent push at the Heels of the software community with others at their heels it could stiffle progress an cause the dreded world of generic products and Burocracy(I can hear the Jaw theme tune in my head for some reason). Anyway my point you need more than just those very important engineers for that one mr gates.
Reply to this comment
Refresh my memories please!
by Joe Real February 20, 2008 10:41 PM PST
What original "breakthroughs" did Microsoft originally made? Microsoft is successful at packaging and marketing the works of others via its monopolistic powers, but breakthroughs? There's none that are have really helped mankind. Microsoft's cancer-like tendrils that contaminates mankind is the only breakthrough that it made.
Reply to this comment
The questions we would liked to have asked...
by Ted Miller February 21, 2008 9:41 AM PST
1. We have noticed many of or CNet readers are not happy with Vista (except for a few MS bootlickers). What do you thik of that. 2 It has been noted many home users are not able to function well with Vista. What do you thik of that? 3. Many have noticed that much software does not work well with Vista but works excellant with XP. What is your reply to that? 4. Do you use Vista (honestly now) on your home computers? 5. What is the dominent operating system being used at Microsoft? 6 If it is Vista, how are the employees putting up with the abuse? I could go on and on, but I am sure you got the drift 6.
Reply to this comment View reply
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Yahoo tries to conceal lawsuit documents
Social graphs just wanna be free, but will they?
HP to launch fall line of teen-designed products
Conde Nast buys Ars Technica
Google to host 'Factory Tour' Monday morning
Most Popular Stories
Images: Microsoft telescope puts universe on your desktop
Photos: Cracking open the Atari 2600
This VC forecast scares the pants off of me
End of Intel, AMD duopoly near? Via readies Isaiah chip
Photos: Microsoft previews 2008 Xbox games
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You can do more when your phone runs Windows®
Windows Mobile

See it all at StartDoingMore.com Start Doing More

Start doing more
Get More Done with Windows Mobile

There's so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. StartDoingMore.com>

Familiar Microsoft Software and Services

With a Windows Mobile phone, your easy-to-use Microsoft software go wherever you go.

Choose the perfect phone for you

Side, flip, qwerty, touchscreen? See More>

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Microsoft (-1.51%) -0.46 29.99
Yahoo (-0.32%) -0.09 27.66
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.05%) -5.86 12,986.80
S&P 500 (0.13%) 1.78 1,425.35
NASDAQ (-0.19%) -4.88 2,528.85
CNET TECH (0.05%) 0.88 1,783.62
  Symbol Lookup
Detroit auto show
Detroit auto show

Detroit auto show
advertisement
Click Here
On GameFAQs: Grand Theft Auto IV (PS3) cheats & more!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CNET Networks sites: